1 / 35

ISA Expo 2006 SP100 Overview

ISA Expo 2006 SP100 Overview. October 17, 2006 Houston, TX. Presented by: Dick Caro Dick@CMC.us CMC Associates, Acton, MA http://CMC.us. Paul Sereiko President. KAPM Strategic Management http://www.kapmgroup.com. So Much Wireless… Why a new standard?.

morwenna
Télécharger la présentation

ISA Expo 2006 SP100 Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISA Expo 2006SP100 Overview October 17, 2006 Houston, TX Presented by: Dick Caro Dick@CMC.us CMC Associates, Acton, MA http://CMC.us Paul Sereiko President KAPM Strategic Management http://www.kapmgroup.com

  2. So Much Wireless… Why a new standard?

  3. Challenges of Industrial Wireless • RF communication links vary in time/space • Reflection • Absorption • Moving equipment • Environmental conditions • Machines turning on/off • RF Interference • Known interferers in the ISM bands • Unknown interferers  Industrial sites have all of these challenges in spades!!

  4. Spatial Effect of Multipath

  5. Frequency Dependent Fading and Interference From: Werb et al., “Improved Quality of Service in IEEE 802.15.4 Networks”, Intl. Wkshp. On Wireless and Industrial Automation, San Francisco, March 7, 2005.

  6. Time Based Variations

  7. Here’s another Example

  8. Challenges of Industrial Applications • Consequences of failure are serious • Must be reliable • Must be secure • Unpredictable placement and spacing • Not a regular grid like a building • May be dense or sparse (or both in the same facility) • Must operate for the life of the instrument • 10’s of years, not 10’s of months • Reliable over the long haul, not just the first year • Low power to allow for battery-powered devices  And many more….

  9. Why a new standard? • Industrial markets and applications have very strict reliability and security requirements • Current standards do not meet these requirements • Standard must encompass all technology layers to enable seamless interoperability with legacy systems

  10. SP100 Scope • The ISA-SP100 Committee will establish standards, recommended practices, technical reports, and related information that will define procedures for implementing wireless systems in the automation and control environment with a focus on the field level (Level 0) • Guidance is directed towards those responsible for the complete life cycle including the designing, implementing, on-going maintenance, scalability or managing manufacturing and control systems, and shall apply to users, system integrators, practitioners, and control systems manufacturers and vendors - Excerpt from SP100 Charter Authorization Documents

  11. SP100 Membership (as of 3/06) 3e Technologies International Adalet Wireless Adaptive Instruments Advanced Industrial Networks Apprion ARC Advisory Group Argonne National Laboratory Aujas Systems Automation Electronics Automation World Bayer Boeing BP America Cambridge Silicon Radio Chevron CMC Associates Compressor Controls Crossbow Technology Dust Networks Eaton ELPRO Technologies Emerson Process Management Endress+Hauser EPRI Charlotte ESAII-UPC ESensors Exxon/Mobil Frontline Test Equipment GE Global Research General Monitors Honeywell IoSelect Invensys Kinney Consulting Lyondell Equistar Chemicals Oak Ridge National Labs Omnex Controls MaCT USA Michigan Technological University Motorola NIST NuFlo Measurement Systems Occidental Petroleum Qatar Oceana Sensor OPTI Canada Parsons Brinckerhoff Phoenix Contact Proto-Power ProSoft Technology Putnam Media Rice Lake Weighing Systems Rockwell Automation Global Rosemount Safety Control Solutions Saudi Aramco Schneider Electric Sensicast Systems Shell Global Solutions Shindengen America SMAR International Smart Sensor Systems StatSignal Systems Syncrude Canada UniTorq Actuators University of Alabama Wunderlich-Malec Engineering Yokogawa Electric Zone Automation Currently over 200 members

  12. SP100 Organization Structure as of July 06

  13. How work gets done • Each work group conducts regular teleconferences and face-to-face meetings as needed. • Groups are made up of OEMs, suppliers and end users. • The full SP100 committee meets 4 times a year for 3-4 days. • Electronic tools such as the SP100 website, an FTP site and a Microsoft Sharepoint server are used to coordinate work and deliverables. • All documents released by the committee are vetted through a balloting process.

  14. How work products are organized • Categorized by ‘usage class’ • Categorized by layer in the OSI stack model • Categorized by document type

  15. SP100 Usage Classes Importance ofmessage timeliness increases

  16. OSI Technology Layers Layer 7 = Application Layer 6 = Presentation Layer 5 = Session Layer 4 = Transport Layer 3 = Network Layer 2 = Link Layer 1 = Physical Layers follow accepted conventions. Documents spanning multiple layers are numbered at the highest layer. EX: SP100.5.2 could be prescribe a single standard spanning the physical and link layer of class 5 applications

  17. SP100 Work Product Structure A Matrix Approach User Application - class X axis Technology Layers SP100.11 SP100.14 Y-Axis Document Reference Scheme: SP100.x.y

  18. Each “Cell” Will Contain Prescriptive Documents “Must Do” Descriptive Documents “Should Do” Informational Documents Educational

  19. SP100 Schedule CY 2007 CY 2008 CY 2006 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Use Case Generation Call For Proposals Proposals Submitted Selection of Baseline Technology Specification Written Edits and Comments Submission to ISA Products Available

  20. SP100 Standard Development Is A User Focused Process • Users participate in the committee • Numerous user surveys have been and are being commissioned • The “Use Case Process” is one of our valuable tools for soliciting user information

  21. Use Case Structure • Site Description: Where wireless is to be deployed • Oil refinery • Food processing plant • Paper mill • Train car • Etc… • Application: What a wireless solution accomplishes • Tank level monitoring • Perimeter security monitoring • Etc… • Tasks: How individual tasks are accomplished and required type and quality of service • Periodic reporting of monitored values • Alerting and alarming • Device installation and commissioning • Device diagnostics and maintenance • Etc…

  22. Current Use Case Completion StatusUser Supplied (Sept ’06) Sunoco Oil Refinery Gas Transmission Monitoring of alyk valve in refinery for maintenance-Chevron Monitoring of well heads in offshore structure-Chevron GM-Barcode and RFID reading.xls GM-Bit-level switches.xls GM-Bit-level switches & pressure sensors on robotics.xls GM-Hand held portable electric torque wrench Water-Waste Water SCADA System DuPont Memphis well water monitor SP100UseCaseGuide_RTM.xls Fertilizer Plant monitor and control catalyst converter bed temperature Large Remote Multiple Well Site Industry Mix Oil – 11 Chemical – 3 Natural Gas – 2 Electric Power – 3 Wastewater – 2 Automotive – 4 Misc – 4 Total = 28

  23. Use Cases Scheduled for Completion • Shell Martinez Refinery • Pacific Gas & Electric • PSI Control Systems Inc • Florida Power & Light • Amgen • Altech USA • Omaha Public Power District • Cook Pharmica LLC • Immunicon • Bristol-Myers Squibb • Amtek Meters & Controls • Amgen • Southern Company • Arizona Public Service Co • Automated Control Concepts • Barry D. Payne & Associates • BJ Baldwin Elecric, Inc • Bechtel • BE & K • Bell Helicopter Co • EPRI Total = 43

  24. Use Case Completion StatusVendor Supplied

  25. Use Case Template Excel spreadsheet with three tabs, one for each component

  26. How to Submit a Use Case • Get us your name, number and email today and we will pair you with an SP100 representative. • Your representative will forward the use case template to you and setup a one hour phone call to complete the case. • Subsequent use cases take less time as you will be familiar with the template and questions. • If your company/organization would like to submit multiple use cases you may want to train yourself or a colleague on the use case process.

  27. Where does your use case go? • Use cases will be submitted in raw form to the SP100.11 technical groups for inclusion in evaluation criteria and requirements generation. • ALL information in the use case is openly available to SP100 members • Periodic summaries and reports are compiled and distributed to members

  28. What Have We Learned from the Currently Completed Use Cases?

  29. Conclusions: Sites are Large Size = Small city

  30. Site Deployments are Generally Small Relative to Facility Size (5%) Occasional full site coverage is desired

  31. Data Change Rates – Cluster around Milliseconds, Seconds and Multiple Minutes

  32. And if you want to learn more …. • PLEASE JOIN THE COMMITTEE AND VOLUNTEER SOME TIME! THANK YOU VERY MUCH!

More Related