1 / 7

Gerrymandering Culminating Activity

Gerrymandering Culminating Activity. PIH Network 2019. Task: Determine how the Supreme Court should rule on Gerrymandering. Materials Provided

mosley
Télécharger la présentation

Gerrymandering Culminating Activity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gerrymandering Culminating Activity PIH Network 2019

  2. Task: Determine how the Supreme Court should rule on Gerrymandering. Materials Provided • Supreme Court precedent summaries laid out in the following cases: Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), Baker v. Carr (1962), Reynolds v. Simms (1964), Vieth v. Jubelirer, (2004), Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, (2015), Gill v. Whitford (2019) • Constitutional Amendments related to voting • Politician quotes about gerrymandering. Outline arguments for why the court would vote in favor of all three options and then make a choice for which one the court should take.

  3. Task: Determine how the Supreme Court should rule on Gerrymandering. Context: The Supreme Court is hearing cases this session in 2019 Your job is to take on the role of a Supreme Court Justice and determine how the court should handle the issue of gerrymandering. Analyze the recent evidence regarding Gerrymandering and make a ruling on how you feel the court should handle the issue of Gerrymandering. To help, use the Supreme Court precedent cases and the video clips regarding Benisek v. Lemone and Rucho v. Common Cause to support your claims. Additionally, you will be provided an organizer on the constitutional amendments related to voting and politician quotes on gerrymandering.

  4. Supreme Court Cases on the Docket • Benisek v. Lamone(Argued on March 26, 2019) • Involves Maryland • https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=244&v=dYyXjxCU-34 • Rucho v. Common Cause (Argued on March 26,2019) • https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=140&v=bdI7OVAIhpY • Involves North Carolina

  5. Both cases involve Partisan gerrymandering • 1st map is of Maryland's map Benisek v. Lemone case. • Drawn by Democrats • 2nd map is of North Carolina’s Rucho v. Common Cause • Drawn by Republicans Pay attention to the shapes of the districts, be critical of their sizes.

More Related