1 / 28

AGS Middle School 2013 - 2014 Teacher Evaluation

This document outlines the legislative changes in teacher evaluation and student growth assessment for the 2013-2014 school year. It provides details on the performance evaluation criteria, classroom observation requirements, teacher evaluation rubric, student growth measurements, and goal development. The overall teacher evaluation rating system is also explained.

mpolansky
Télécharger la présentation

AGS Middle School 2013 - 2014 Teacher Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AGS Middle School2013 - 2014Teacher Evaluation Wednesday, November 20, 2013

  2. Legislative ChangesAct 451 of 1976 – 380.1249 (Revised School Code) • 75% - Performance Evaluation (to comprise 60% in 2014 - 2015) • 25% - Student Growth & Assessment (to comprise 40% in 2014 - 2015)

  3. Legislative ChangesAct 451 of 1976 – 380.1249 (Revised School Code) • Classroom Observation must include: • Review of Lesson Plan • Identification of Content Standard • Review of Student Engagement • FAPS • Lesson plans are Unit Plans with identified Learning Targets and Agenda • Three classroom observations • Minimum length of ten minutes each

  4. FAPS Pie: 75% 5D+ and 25% Growth

  5. FAPS Teacher Evaluation Tool 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric • One of four models identified by Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) • Developed by the University of Washington College of Education

  6. 5 Dimensions+ of Quality Instruction (75%) • Purpose • Student Engagement • Curriculum & Pedagogy • Assessment for Student Learning • Class Environment & Culture • Professional Collaboration & Communication

  7. Student Growth (25%) • Student Growth measured by national, state, or local assessment • Two required growth measurements: • MEAP Scores (Math, Writing, Reading, Science, Soc. St. –up or down) • Shrinkage of achievement gap between top 30% and lowest 30% of your students • One growth measurement will be selected by the teacher • Fenton Dashboard includes options for measuring growth

  8. Goals for 2013-14 • Teachers must develop three goals • Use same form as last year • At least one goal must support building School Improvement plan and Student Achievement • Goals submitted to administrators

  9. Overall Teacher Evaluation • 5D+ Rubric (75%) 111 points possible • Student Growth (25%) 36 points possible • Completed Goals 1 point possible Total: 148 points possible Overall Teacher Evaluation Rating: Highly Effective 111 – 148 points Effective 74 – 110 points Minimally Effective 27 – 73 points Ineffective 0 – 26 points

  10. 5 Dimensions+ Rubric • 6 Dimensions • 37 indicators of teacher performance • 4 performance levels • Unsatisfactory 0 points • Basic 1 point • Proficient 2 points • Distinguished 3 points • 111 total possible points to be earned (37 indicators X 3 pts each) equaling 75% of overall teacher evaluation

  11. Student Growth • 3 Measures of Student Growth • 12 points possible to be earned for each measure • 36 total possible points to be earned, equaling 25% of overall teacher evaluation • 1 point possible for turning in your goals

  12. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • Teachers responsible for students improved MEAP scores in content areas they most likely impact. • Depending on your teaching assignment, earn evaluation points based on MEAP improvement from Fall 2012 to Fall 2013. • SE teachers will be included in the core department in which they teach.

  13. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • English Teachers: Neg Flat Pos MEAP Writing 0 3 6 MEAP Reading 0 3 6

  14. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) Writing • Improving MEAP Scores • English Teachers: For Example… Points Earned MEAP Reading

  15. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • Math Teachers: Neg Flat Pos Grade Level Math 0 6 12

  16. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • Math Teachers: For Example… Points Earned Math

  17. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • Science Teachers: Neg Flat Pos 8th Grade Science 0 6 12

  18. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • Science Teachers: For Example… Points Earned 8th Grade Science

  19. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • Social Studies Teachers: Neg Flat Pos 9thGrade Soc.St. MEAP 0 6 12

  20. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Scores • Social Studies Teachers: For Example… Points Earned 9th Grade Soc.St. MEAP

  21. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Reading Scores • World Language, PE, Visual Arts & Music Teachers: Neg Flat/Maintained Pos MEAP Reading 6th 0 2 4 Reading 7th 0 2 4 Reading 8th 0 2 4

  22. Required Growth Measure #1 (One third of 25%) • Improving MEAP Reading • World Language, PE, & Unified Arts Teachers: For Example… MEAP Reading

  23. Required Growth Measure #2 (One third of 25%) • Improving Achievement of Bottom 30% • Determine which of your students is in bottom 30%, based on data you collected from pre/post testing, unit grades or the other multiple data points you used. • Growth of each student in your bottom 30% measured concurrently at end of third marking period and final % earned on data you collected

  24. Required Growth Measure #2 (One third of 25%) • Improving Achievement of Bottom 30% • All Teachers: Points Earned 0 – 64% of bottom 30% of students show growth 0 65 – 74% of bottom 30% of students show growth 4 75 – 84% of bottom 30% of students show growth 8 85 – 100% of bottom 30% of students show growth 12

  25. Optional Growth Measure (One third of 25%) • Credit/Class Passed Earned by Students / Semester 2013-14 Semester 1 for all students taught (not including SRT) All Teachers: Points Earned 0 – 64% of students pass course 0 65 – 74% of students pass course 4 75 – 84% of students pass course 8 85 – 100% of students pass course 12

  26. Optional Growth Measure (One third of 25%) • AIMS Web Scores, Department Common Assessments, Standardized Assessments (Star Reader, etc..) Student Performance Project Based Rubrics (IB) for all Students All Teachers: Points Earned 0 – 64% of students show growth 0 65 – 74% of students show growth 4 75 – 84% of students show growth 8 85 – 100% of students show growth 12

  27. Next Steps… • Continue to assess yourself on each of the 5D+ performance indicators • Use rubrics during peer observations, schedule, attend your peer observations • Be working with your Bottom 30% to show growth and evidence

  28. Next Steps (cont)… Assess yourself in best case and worst case scenarios Figure out organization of data and artifacts i.e. binder, etc… Address questions, concerns, suggestions with administrator at your convenience

More Related