100 likes | 113 Vues
This article explores the use of flank crater distribution to determine the average tectonic stress orientation, focusing on radial dikes. It discusses monogenetic and polygenetic volcanoes, as well as the tectonic settings and trends of radial dikes. The article introduces knowledge to be used in the future, highlighting the potential of flank craters in revealing stress orientation.
E N D
Volcanoes as Possible Indicators of Tectonic Stress Orientation – Principal and Proposal D. Dziekan
Purpose • Concerned with radial dikes • Indicated by flank crater distribution • Use distribution for average tectonic stress orientation
Monogenetic Volcanoes • One eruption • From vent or fissure, essentially dikes • Produces maars, scoria cones, lava domes, or shield volcanoes • Underground conduit formed anew with each eruption • Fissure shaped conduit, not pipe shaped
Polygenetic Volcanoes • Repeated eruptions • All from same vent or vents • Form large volcanic edifices • Form pipe shaped conduit for magma
Flank Volcanoes • Manifestation of underground dikes • Possible to depict regional stress • Conduits most likely fissure shaped • Most are monogenetic volcanoes
Tectonic Setting • Data collected from several sources • Japan • Andes • Aleutians • Central America
Tectonic Setting • Extensional setting • Maximum compressional stress vertical • Parallel
Tectonic Setting • Contractional Setting • Maximum compressional stress horizontal • Typically high angle
Trend of Radial Dikes • Other possible means to reveal trend • Bending of radial fissures • Elongation of main volcanic edifices • Many parallel normal faults within edifices
Conclusion • Focused on principals • Introduced knowledge to be used in the future • Article contained a lot of ‘could’ and ‘possibly’ • Use flank craters to determine dike trends • Dike trends suggest stress orientation