190 likes | 290 Vues
Content Analysis of the IMF Article IV Staff Reports for Euro Area Countries. Lena Golubovskaja, NUIM April 14, 2011. IEA ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Outline. I ntroduction T heoretical Developments D ata and Methodology A nalysis of the Data C oncluding Remarks. Problem. The IMF’s Judgement.
E N D
Content Analysis of the IMF Article IV Staff Reports for Euro Area Countries Lena Golubovskaja, NUIM April 14, 2011 IEA ANNUAL CONFERENCE
Outline • Introduction • Theoretical Developments • Data and Methodology • Analysis of the Data • Concluding Remarks
Problem The IMF’s Judgement • In the United States “core commercial and investment banks are in a sound financial position, and systemic risks appear low” (IMF, 2007:14) • “Favorable global economic prospects, particularly strong momentum in the Euro area and in emerging markets led by China and India, continue to serve as a strong foundation for global financial stability…” (GFSR)
EMU Fiscal Policies Was the miracle a ‘mirage’? • Some northern countries (Germany, Austria, the Netherlands) experienced competitiveness gains and accumulated huge external surpluses. • Some southern countries (Spain, Portugal, Greece) accumulated huge external deficits under imbalanced high growth strategies driven by strong negative real interest rates.
Case Study: Ireland • Large transitory tax receipts used to fund tax cuts and permanent spending commitments • Budget surpluses were insufficiently large • Excessive current spending growth • Narrowed tax base • Policy stance was inappropriately procyclical
Deterioration in Fiscal Positions: EU Members, 2007-09 IRE IRE LAT LAT UK UK ESP ESP Chart plots change in budget balance (x-axis) and in gross debt (y-axis), as % of GDP between 2007 and 2009. Source: Public Finances in EMU, EC 2009
Theoretical Developments Textual analysis using computer algorithms Economic implications of the external policy reports • The accuracy of information (Batchelor, 2001) • Pellechio and Cady (2005) • Corporate earnings releases (Rogers at al., 2009) • Accounting policy disclosures (Levine and Smith, 2006) • Multiple sources of financial text (Kothari, Li, and Short, 2008) • Asymmetric Effect of the Beige Book Language (Armesto et al., 2006)
Content Analysis ‘Anecdotical’ Evidence: Opinions of the IMF executive Board, Ireland • “The continued impressive performance of the Irish economy, which is based on sound economic policies, provides useful lessons for other countries” (2004) • “Impressive performance is due in significant measure to sound economic policies, including prudent fiscal policies… The housing market is likely headed for a soft landing, but there is a risk of a sharp decline.” (2005) • “A number of directors, however, saw less merit in fiscal tightening at the current juncture, pointing to the need for further increases in spending to achieve social goals” (2006) • “The directors commended Ireland’s continued impressive economic performance. this performance has been underpinned by outward-oriented policies, prudent fiscal policy, low taxes and labour market flexibility” (2007)
Concerns/Risk Factors Identified by IMF (IV), Ireland *Author calculations Limitations
Content Analysis DICTION 5.0 • Dictionary-based program that counts types of words most frequently encountered in contemporary American public discourse and is designed to capture the linguistic style. • Uses 10,000 search words assigned to 35 theoretically-based linguistic categories to characterize text on several dimensions. • Advantages: pre-existing search rules, efficient analysis of large number of text, partial correction for the context. • Disadvantage: assumes that higher frequency usages of a word or phrase mean the concept is more meaningful.
Content Analysis DICTION 5.0: thematic categories and sub-categories
Content Analysis DICTION 5.0: Hardship Dictionary • Bias, Corrupting, Crime, Crises, Deficit, Depress, Deteriorate, Difficulties, Distress, Disturbance, Folly, Problem, Recession, Risk, Shock, Weakness, Worry, Worse…
Data and Methodology Data • 16 euro area countries • Staff Reports,IV (2005-2007) • Executive Board Assessments , PIN (2005-2007) Sample construction • Only textual part of the documents
Validation of WARNING measure Case of U.S., Staff Reports (IV) Mean of 5.86 and standard deviation of 4.64 based on 122 runs of a variety of financial news stories.
WARNING, Staff Reports Insignificantly different results for Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Slovakia Average WARNING scores for the euro area: Staff Reports, 2005-2007
Did WARNING score change over time for EMU? Staff Reports, 1999-2009
WARNING, Staff Reports WARNING for Ireland is not statistically different from the euro area averages only for the years 2002, 2003, and 2006
Summary • Do not allow editing by member-country • The language of surveillance needs to be unambiguous • More weight on analysis, less on diplomacy: strengthen the role of staff/secretariat. • Standard-based approach for staff interactions.