1 / 15

GLIF Infrastructure

GLIF Infrastructure. SC2004 Panel Discussion. Peter Clarke UK National e-Science Centre. Questions Why are Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States involved in GLIF?

mura
Télécharger la présentation

GLIF Infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GLIF Infrastructure SC2004 Panel Discussion Peter Clarke UK National e-Science Centre

  2. Questions • Why are Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States involved in GLIF? • What can be accomplished on lambdas that cannot be accomplished on "best-effort" networks? • Where does your infrastructure connect? • What's missing? When will we implement a totally functional LambdaGrid? • What do you see as the future of networking?

  3. Questions • Why are Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States involved in GLIF? • Community Lobby • National Competitiveness in Research • Acceptance that one size manifestly doesn’t fit all • Capability for Research • You cant do it alone (by definition its an end-2-end thing) • Trust

  4. Capability : Steering & Migration of Computationally intensive simulations Cubic micellar phase, low surfactant density gradient. Initial condition: Random water/ surfactant mixture. Self-assembly starts. Lamellar phase: surfactant bilayers between water layers. Rewind and restart from checkpoint.

  5. Source: Reality Grid Project www.realitygrid.org UK HPC machines connected to TeraGrid for SC2003 Now a persistent connection

  6. Capability: Breast Screening Programmes Current system is “minimal” technologically (taken from e-DiaMoND Project)

  7. Future should be digitised and processed images (taken from e-DiaMoND Project) Remote Radiographers ? NETWORK 2nd opinion Remote Patient information • Requires ~ Gbit/s flows for remote access • Will not be possible without scheduled guaranteed net-services

  8. What can be accomplished on lambdas that cannot be accomplished on "best-effort" networks? • An R&D network is not a production network – you can do “out of the box” things • Certainty of having what you need when you need it (but not scalable today of course) – means research computing can be planned • Ability to use non standard transport • Fixed latency => “backplane” connections between compute centres => virtual machine rooms • Provide virtual networks a la UCLP, and push management to the users

  9. CDF – ConnectionUCL-FNAL

  10. Where does your infrastructure connect ?

  11. Source: Kees Neggers, SURFnet NewYork MANLAN Stockholm NorthernLight 10 Gbit/s IEEAF 10 Gbit/s 10 Gbit/s 2.5 Gbit/s 2.5 Gbit/s 10 Gbit/s SURFnet 10 Gbit/s CA*net4 Amsterdam NetherLight Chicago StarLight Tokyo WIDE IEEAF 10 Gbit/s 10 Gbit/s NSF 10 Gbit/s 10 Gbit/s 10 Gbit/s 2.5 Gbit/s SURFnet 10 Gbit/s Tokyo APAN 2.5 Gbit/s 10 Gbit/s London UKLight Geneva CERN Prague CzechLight

  12. As a result of the initiative, UKERNA have pushed through a complementary initiative to provide a nationwide domestic R&D network in parallel with SupetJANET UHI Network AbMAN Clydenet FaTMAN EaStMAN T T C&NL MAN NNW C T Glasgow Edinburgh NorMAN S YHMAN T Warrington Leeds T EMMAN MidMAN T EastNet Reading T London Kentish MAN TVN Portsmouth T Bristol LMN Northern Ireland S S South Wales MAN London UKLight S T SWERN LeNSE

  13. What's missing? When will we implement a totally functional LambdaGrid? • When NRENS all adopt hybrid networking as the normal business model • Requirement: irrefutable proof of benefit • Political: national competitiveness, one price for all issues.. • Financial: proof of cost effectiveness • Policy: • When we have a common and “standards” based control plane infrastructure – not individual solutions : now is the time to get together on this one(IMHO) • I have no idea about the last mile issue

  14. What do you see as the future of networking Wrong guy to ask – I think from point of view of future of computationally intensive research where I would say: • We must get to point where network is not seen by researchers as a big barrier which keeps sites disjoint • Must ensure it is understood that research capability is currently inhibited by “traditional” network provision • Must ensure it is understood that one size doesn’t fit all is a good idea (there is no way research could be carried out if we all took commercial IP connections)

  15. Router Router Routed IP Network “layer-2” split out of wavelength [e.g. Ethernet] … a possible Network of the Future…. • Provides • Normal best effort IP network where appropriate • Extended “virtual LANs” where appropriate • Switched lightpaths where appropriate

More Related