Download
1 / 26
260 likes | 452 Vues
Costs and Benefit Analysis of tax exemptions for export promotion schemes Sukumar Mukhopadhyay ICRIER. Export Promotion Schemes namely,. Drawback Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) Export Promotion Capital Goods.
E N D
Costs and Benefit Analysis of tax exemptions for export promotion schemes Sukumar Mukhopadhyay ICRIER
Export Promotion Schemes namely, • Drawback • Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) • Export Promotion Capital Goods
To get an idea of the coverage of the schemes in relation to total exports we see the following graph:
COST OF EXPORT: Three elements to discuss: • Duty foregone (Not a cost really) • Misuse of the schemes • Subsidy
Cost of export is not duty forgone Duty forgone is necessary for zero rating to make export possible All over the world zero-rating is done India has to do it to make export competitive If export was not there, there would be no manufacture of the goods now being manufactured So there would be no duty collected also
These demands issued for alleged misuse are not confirmed demand. Confirmed demand means confirmed amount of misuse which comes to Rs.232 crores for three years(2003-2006) Since all misuses are not booked, the total misuse comes to Rs. 1160 crores. (on the basis of an assumption that 20% of cases are booked.)
Cost due to subsidy inherent in the DEPB Scheme • This has been found by a comparison of rates of DEPB and Drawback on an item by item basis. • A total of 87 items have been compared from the DEPB and Drawback schedules of 2006.(an example is given in the next slide) • Other items do not tally name by name as DEPB does not follow HSN.
The average of DEPB rates is calculated to be 3.55. The average of Drawback rates is calculated to be 1.55. The difference is 2, which is 56% of the average DEPB rate. Thus, 56% of the DEPB amount is paid as subsidy. For the purpose of this study, the same rate of 56% has been assumed for all the years as in the next slide.
Forecast of the cost of export for the next three years (the forecast is on the assumption that the customs duty comes down to 10% and capital goods duty to 7 ½%)
The projected cost of export for 2003-04 to 2009-10 is shown as:(figures in Rs.crores)
Assessment of the Schemes: • Exports have not risen after 1997, in the same rate after DEPB was introduced. • In the ten years from 1991-92 to 1995-96, the average rate of growth was 26.2%. • In the next five years after DEPB was introduced, from 1996-97 to 2001-02, the average rate of growth was 11.75%. • Thus, the notion that after DEPB, export boomed is wrong.
A comparison of the rates of growth of exports before and after the introduction of DEPB are shown as:
Benefits: • The benefits of the schemes are judged in the overall background of the proposition about export led growth. • Higher exports lead to growth by increasing production and income through technological advancement and expansion of market. • Increase in exports can be better effected through developing competition and improvement of infrastructure rather than by giving subsidy.
Some specific suggestions: • It is very much worthwhile to continue the three schemes with modifications as suggested below and by removing overlapping and multiplicity of them. • EPCG should remain. EPCG will soon meet with easy and gradual death with Customs duty for capital goods coming down to even 7.5%. Nobody would avail of it for a difference of 2.5%. • For neutralization of Central Excise Duty, Rules 18 and 19 should continue. • Drawback should remain. • DEPB should be abolished.
If DEPB continues it should Be only on the basis of HSN which is followed by Drawback schedule. Adopt Drawback rates. If the above suggestions are implemented, there will be no need for the other overlapping schemes like DEEC (Advance Authorization Scheme) or DFIA( Duty Free Import Authorization Scheme), which may be abolished.
There should be a new blanket exemption for allowing duty free imports for manufacture for export: • There should be a blanket exemption in Customs for goods imported for manufacture of goods to be exported. If the Ministry of Finance wants to ensure that only neutralization of duty takes place, and no subsidy is given, then this is one very good method to give a blanket exemption, which is easy to administer by the Ministry of Finance alone. • In Customs Tariff, we have already made provision for allowing duty free import for manufacture of goods for indigenous market on the fulfillment of condition 5. • “5. If the importer follows the procedure set out in the Customs( Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules,1996.” • These rules provide that the importer has to declare and give a bond to the Central Excise Officers in control of the factory where the manufacture takes place. The officers have to show proof that the goods have actually been manufactured.
For example, if bulk drugs falling under tariff item No.28,20,30 or 38 are imported and used in the manufacture of life saving drugs or medicines, they are exempted subject to the condition No.5 above. The manufacturer will be required to follow the same existing SION, fixed by the Commerce Ministry and satisfy the Central Excise Officers that the goods have been exported to the extent manufactured on the basis of this SION. The manufacturer has only to show the shipping bills after export to the factory officers, who would then discharge the bond. Thus by merely extending the existing system of end use exemption, the same purpose would be achieved which is now done by granting license. So the Advance Authorization and the DFRC can be abolished.
