1 / 26

Calcaneus Fractures

Calcaneus Fractures. presented by Sepein Chiang, DO. Introduction. Displaced, intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge Limited by radiographic examination CT has revolutionized the understanding & treatment of calcaneus fractures.

myles-scott
Télécharger la présentation

Calcaneus Fractures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Calcaneus Fractures presented by Sepein Chiang, DO

  2. Introduction • Displaced, intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge • Limited by radiographic examination • CT has revolutionized the understanding & treatment of calcaneus fractures

  3. Historical Treatments • Originally, focus was on restoration of overall shape & correction of Bohler’s angle via a medial approach. • This lead to poor reduction of the joint surface. • Stephenson: added a lateral approach for joint reduction • Sanders: medial approach is rarely needed

  4. Anatomy • Anterior half of the superior articular surface contains 3 facets which articulate with the talus

  5. Mechanism of Injury • Fall from heights • MVA

  6. Clinical Evaluation • Neurovascular status • Soft tissue swelling • Compartment syndrome • Opposite calcaneus (10%) • Bilateral lower extremity (25%) • Vertebral fractures (10%)

  7. Radiographic Evaluation • AP • Calcaneocuboid extension • Lateral wall bulge

  8. Radiographic Evaluation • LAT • Loss of height of the posterior facet • “Double density” • Bohler’s angle: 20-40° • Gissane’s angle: 120-140°

  9. Radiographic Evaluation • Harris axial heel view • Foot in maximum dorsiflexion • Beam angled 45° cephalad • Shows subtalar joint surface, loss of height, increase in width and varus/valgus angulation

  10. Radiographic Evaluation • Broden’s views • Supine, foot in neutral flexion, internally rotated 30-40° • X-ray centered over lateral malleolus, taken at 40,30,20,10° cephalad • Shows posterior facet (10°) • Useful intra-operatively to assess reduction

  11. Broden’s Views

  12. CT Scan • Scan both feet, 3 mm cuts • Coronal: perpendicular to posterior facet • Supine, hip & knees flexed, plantar surface resting on table • Shows articular surface of posterior facet, sustentaculum tali • Transverse: perpendicular to coronal view • Extend hip & knees • Shows calcaneocuboid joint, anteroinferior aspect of the posterior facet, sustentaculum tali, lateral wall • 3D spiral CT allows rotation, sections, removal of bones

  13. Sanders’ Classification • 1986, based on Soeur & Remy classification • Based on number & location of articular fragments on coronal view • Posterior facet divided into 3 equal, potential pieces (lateral, central, medial) & sustentaculum tali

  14. Sanders’ Type I • All nondisplaced fractures, regardless of number of pieces • Usually non-operative, unless severely displaced

  15. Sanders’ Type II • Two-part fracture of the posterior facet • Subtypes IIA, IIB, IIC • Similar to a split fracture of the tibial plateau

  16. Sanders’ Type III • Three-part fractures with a centrally depressed fragment • Subtypes IIIAB, IIIAC, IIIBC • Similar to a split, depressed fracture of the tibial plateau or die-punch distal radius fracture

  17. Sanders’ Type IV • Four-part, highly comminuted • Extremely difficult to reduce the articular surface • Irreversible damage to the “intact” articular cartilage

  18. Treatment Options • Tailor to the “personality of the fracture” • Non-operative • ORIF • Primary or delayed arthrodesis • Subtalar • Triple: talonavicular, talocalcaneal, calcaneocuboid

  19. Non-operative Treatment • Extra-articular, open fractures with life threatening injuries, soft tissue compromises, severe PVD or DM, severely comminuted in osteopenic bone • Tongue type fractures with little articular comminution can be reduced percutaneously with a Steinmann pin and placed in a cast

  20. Operative Treatment • Ideally within 3 weeks • Wait for swelling to decrease • Restore articular surface of posterior facet & calcaneocuboid joint • Take the heel out of varus • Restore the length of the heel • Reduce lateral wall blowout

  21. Surgical Technique • Kocher lateral incision • “No touch” technique • Careful of sural nerve & peroneal tendons

  22. Surgical Technique • Reduce posterior facet & hold with K-wires or lag screws • Reduce calcaneocuboid joint & lateral wall • Reduce heel out to length and out of varus • 3.5 recon plate, H plate, Sanders’ Y plate • Bone grafting: controversial

  23. Primary Arthrodesis • Subtalar fusion or triple arthrodesis • Type IV- extremely difficult to reduce the articular surface • Irreversible damage to the “intact” articular cartilage

  24. Post-op Management • Bulky Jones dressing • POD 2: remove drain • POD 3: removable SLC • Early supervised subtalar ROM exercises • NWB 8-12 weeks • FWB by 3 months

  25. Complications • Wound dehiscense • Osteomyelitis • Subtalar arthritis • Peroneal tendonitis • Sural nerve injury or entrapment from scarring

  26. Conclusion • Learning curve: 35 to 50 cases, or 2 years before results can become predictable for Type II and III fractures • Type IV are so severe that even the most experienced surgeons will have difficulty • An anatomic articular reduction is necessary for a good outcome, but cannot guarantee it, due to cartilage necrosis from the original injury

More Related