0 likes | 8 Vues
In workers' compensation cases, judges employ a range of methods and factors to evaluate the credibility of witnesses. This assessment can vary among judges, with some relying heavily on their perception of a witness's demeanor and body language to determine their truthfulness. <br><br>To learn more about it, read our latest article on PAWorkInjury.Info blog: https://paworkinjury.info/workers-compensation-judges-decide-cases/
E N D
HOW WORKERS' COMPENSATION JUDGE EVALUATES THE CREDIBILITY OF A WITNESS?
Different judges may employ different approaches to evaluate credibility. Judges assess the credibility of a witness in workers' compensation cases using various methods and factors including:
DEMEANOR OR BODY LANGUAGE OF THE WITNESS: Some judges rely on their perception of the witness's demeanor and body language to determine if they are telling the truth.
INCONSISTENCIES IN STATEMENTS: Inconsistencies in a witness's statements, either within their own testimony or compared to other evidence, can impact credibility.
LIES AND FALSE INFORMATION: If a witness is found to have deliberately lied about something significant, a judge may discredit their entire testimony.
THE OVERALL TRUTHFULNESS OF THE STATEMENT: Judges may accept or reject a witness's testimony in whole or in part based on their assessment of truthfulness in specific aspects of the testimony.
Want to know more? Contact Cardamone!