1 / 19

KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT

STRATEGY INTERNATIONAL. KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT. Briefer: COL (HE AR) Panagiotis Chanos NATO/IMS/Plans & Policy Senior Staff Officer. KD DEFINITIONS. KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT

myrna
Télécharger la présentation

KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STRATEGY INTERNATIONAL KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT Briefer: COL (HE AR) Panagiotis Chanos NATO/IMS/Plans & Policy Senior Staff Officer

  2. KD DEFINITIONS • KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT • Process that collects, analyses and integrates isolated data into a usable body of information, and makes it available to be shared. • Based on the understanding of Systems. • SYSTEM • A group of inter-acting or inter-dependent elements. • Political, Military, Economical, Social, Infrastructure & Information Systems. • PMESII “System of Systems” (SoS). • KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT • Organizing and communicating Knowledge.

  3. PMESII DOMAINS P Political M Military KD PMESII I Information E Economical I Infrastructure S Social

  4. KNOWLEDGE vs INTELLIGENCE MILITARY INTELLIGENCE KNOWLEDGEDEVELOPMENT • Focused on adversaries (actual or potential). • Refers to the Area of Ops. • J2/G2 responsibility. • Examines the Military domain. • Sources are primarily military. • Analysts are from the military. • Product: IPB – Intelligence Preparation of the Battle Space. • Focused on adversaries, potential adversaries, neutral and friendly nations or entities, plus their environments. • Refers to the entire Operational Environment. • Cross-functional endeavor and responsibility. • Examines all PMESII domains. • Encompasses the deliberate use of non-military sources. • Analysts are SMEs from both inside and outside the military. • Product: CPOE – Comprehensive Preparation of the Operational Environment.

  5. KD MAIN CHARACTERISTICS • Holistic view. • Situational awareness. • Continuous, Adaptive, Networked. • From Global to Local. • Usable, Functional, Timely. • Common Pool of Information. • Contributors and Users. • Integrates results from other operational activities. • Level of Details differs at Different Levels.

  6. LEVEL OF DETAILS EXAMPLE of Level of Detail and Granularity Required at Different Levels Topic: Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)

  7. KD PROCEDURE EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS REPOSITORIES NATO DBs Open Sources ACQUISITION 3a SEARCH 4 “NEED TO KNOW” 8 Higher Echelon Neighbr HQs 1 3b COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS KD CENTER REQUEST 2 INTERNAL CUSTOMERS 3 Sub HQs ISR Units 3c TASK ANALYSIS 5 Partners Local NATO CUSTOMERS 3d ASSESSMENT & CPOE 7 LIAISE or HIRE Think Tanks Private Sector 3e CLASSIFIED NETWORKS PUBLIC 6 DISSEMINATION UNCLASSIFIED NETWORKS CLASSIFICATION / RELEASABILITY DECISION MAKERS

  8. PRODUCTS FOR DECISION MAKERS • NO Details. • NO Procedures. • NO Reports • NO Analytical Products. • NO Long Texts. ARE WE ADVERTISING? They do NOT have much time (be prepared to provide details) • YES Diagrams. • YES Pictures or Maps. • YES Notes. • YES Assessments. • YES “So What?”. BE CONCISE AND PRECISE! They need to make a TIMELY & RIGHT decision

  9. SO WHAT? EXAMPLE of Update on Weather IMPACT ON

  10. TREND Stable Improving Worsening No Assess SITUATION Favorable Marginal Unfavorable Neutral Unknown USE OF PICTURES & MAPS EXAMPLE of Update on PMESII Domains within the Operational Environment P M E S I I STELLARIA P Political P M Military M E Economic E KAMON S Social S TYTAN I Infrastructure I I Information I PETRACEROS P P M M E E LAKUTA S S I I I I

  11. USE OF DIAGRAMS EXAMPLE of Overall Situation within the Operational Environment COUNTRY DOMAIN TYT (TYTAN) KAM (KAMON) PET (PETR-ROS) STE (STELLARIA) LAK (LAKUTA) P (POLITICAL) M (MILITARY) E (ECONOMIC) S (SOCIAL) I (INFRASTRUCTURE) I (INFORMATION) FAVORABLE UNFAVORABLE UNKNOWN MARGINAL NEUTRAL SITUATION: TREND: WORSENING STABLE IMPROVING NOT ASSESSED

  12. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PEOPLE PROCESSES TOOLS + +

  13. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PEOPLE PROCESSES TOOLS + + • Educated • Trained • Experienced • Available • Motivated (?)

  14. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PEOPLE PROCESSES TOOLS + + • Access • Templates • Formatting • Naming • Classifying • Storage • Searching • Sharing • Filtering • Electronic Signature

  15. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PEOPLE PROCESSES TOOLS + + • Security (Firewalls) • Alert System • Inter-linked DBs • Analysis • Dissemination • Printers • Monitoring • Accessed • Opened • Forwarded • Printed who when where

  16. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PEOPLE PROCESSES TOOLS + + • Educated • Trained • Experienced • Available • Motivated (?) • Access • Templates • Formatting • Naming • Classifying • Storage • Searching • Sharing • Filtering • Electronic Signature • Security (Firewalls) • Alert System • Inter-linked DBs • Analysis • Dissemination • Printers • Monitoring • Accessed • Opened • Forwarded • Printed who when where

  17. Political Military Economic Social Information Infrastructure P M E S I I Systems Analysis S O S A Systems Analysis Systems Analysis Systems Analysis Systems Analysis Systems Analysis KD SUMMARY External View Complex Operational Environment Internal View Comprehensive Awareness & Understanding = Knowledge Development 1. Acquisition 2. Analysis 3. Access Intel Push Pull Non-Intel End Users

  18. COMPLEX BUT NOT COMPLICATED

  19. CONCLUSION QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?

More Related