1 / 7

Environmental knowledge controversies: generative events for science and politics?

Environmental knowledge controversies: generative events for science and politics?. Professor Sarah Whatmore, University of Oxford. Environmental knowledge controversies - definition.

myron
Télécharger la présentation

Environmental knowledge controversies: generative events for science and politics?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environmental knowledge controversies: generative events for science and politics? Professor Sarah Whatmore, University of Oxford

  2. Environmental knowledge controversies - definition Those events in which the knowledge claims and technologies of environmental science, and the regulatory and policy practices of government agencies that they inform, become subject to public interrogation and dispute. Such events take many forms but arise when the rationales and reassurances of environmental science-policy fail to convince those affected by what is at issue - whose direct experience and/or knowledge of it contradicts prevailing expertise, or to allay their concerns.

  3. National floodplain maps: tests show c. 75 to 85% agreement with actual inundation As Pickering floods on the 25th June, the BBC wants pictures Why is flooding controversial? • The speeding up and ‘democratisation ‘ of communication (on-line news, freedom of information) • Floodplain maps with substantial error • Use of flood technologies in day-to-day decision-making (e.g. insurance) • The local unfolding of national policy decisions; the ‘points’ scheme for flood defence investment

  4. Conditional propositions/firm facts Is there something about the demands placed on environmental science in the service of ‘evidence-based’ public policy that is inclined to harden scientific knowledge claims, with all their provisional candour as conditional propositions, into technical statements, with all the reassuring certitude of known facts? Can this be understood in terms of a tension between the ways in which knowledge claims become reliable through the experimental ethos of scientific claims-making and the managerial ethos of public policy claims-making?

  5. Generative events for science and politics? Our work suggests that knowledge controversies can act as force-fields in which expertise is redistributed through the emergence of:- • new knowledge claims, resulting from different kinds and communities of knowledge being brought to bear on the production and distribution of flood risk expertise; and

  6. Generative events for science and politics? (ii) new knowledge polities,in which events like flooding gather publics around them with political attachments and capabilities that did not exist previously.

  7. Participating Institutions Funding Body http://knowledge-controversies.ouce.ox.ac.uk/

More Related