1 / 23

Exploring Collective Behavior in Argentine Ants: Insights for Multi-Robot Systems

This study delves into the self-organizing exploratory patterns of the Argentine ant and evaluates their group food retrieval strategies, providing a model for multi-robot collective transport. Through observed behaviors, the research analyzes how individual ant actions are influenced by colony dynamics, particularly during exploration and while transporting food. Insights suggest that decentralized approaches used by ants are more adaptive and robust than traditional centralized robotic systems, offering valuable implications for designing cooperative robotic algorithms.

naif
Télécharger la présentation

Exploring Collective Behavior in Argentine Ants: Insights for Multi-Robot Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Emergent Behavior in Biological Swarms Stephen Motter

  2. The Papers • The Self-Organizing Exploratory Pattern of the Argentine Ant • Study of Group Food Retrieval by Ants as a Model for Multi-Robot Collective Transport 1

  3. Paper 1 The Self-Organizing Exploratory Pattern of the Argentine Ant • Authors: • J. L. Deneubourg • S. Aron • S. Goss • J. M. Pasteels • Appeared in the Journal of Insect Behavior, 1990 2

  4. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Problem Statement • How do ants explore? • Rather, how is a single ant’s exploration affected by the previous ants? Is it a function? Can we model it? • Homogenous/heterogeneous agents? 3

  5. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Insights • Ants explore with no fixed destination. • They do this at night (so no visual cues). • The Argentine ant lays her pheromone continuously (not just on return). 4

  6. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Approach • Observe the exploratory pattern. • Reduce to a binary choice (diamond bridge). • Generate a model from observed data. • Does a Monte-Carlo model fit? • General choice function: 5

  7. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Experiment (Open Arena) • This experiment has two parts. • Empty arena (no food or debris). • Automatically photographed every 60 seconds. • Sand periodically replaced. Note: This is an artist’s rendition of the experiment, as no image of the arena was provided by the authors. 6

  8. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Experiment (Diamond Bridge) • The second part is more controlled. • Ants crossing bridge counted every 3-minutes. • Ants prevented from doubling back. 7

  9. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Results (Open Arena) • Ants explore close to the nest first. • The front advances, but leaves a trail. • Number of explorers grows logistically. • Picking out returning explorers halts exploration development. • Ants will not ‘re-explore’ a well-explored area. 8

  10. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Results (Open Arena) 9

  11. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Results (Diamond Bridge) • Both branches chosen equally at first. • Positive feedback rapidly makes one path preferable. • Ants act reactively (as a function of # ant passages). 10

  12. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Results (Diamond Bridge) (Note: The axes on these graphs are not the same) 11

  13. Critique Paper 1 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Critique • The model fits, but a lot of simplifications are required. • Pheromone quantity estimated by number of ants passing (ignores evaporation, assumes each ant lays equal amount of pheromone). • The ‘separated ants’ appear more dispersed in experiments than model. 12

  14. Paper 2 Study of Group Food Retrieval by Ants as a Model for Multi-Robot Collective Transport • Authors: • S. Berman • Q. Lindsey • V. Kumar • M. S. Sakar • S. C. Pratt • Appeared in the Proceedings of the IEEE, 2011 13

  15. Critique Paper 2 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Problem Statement • What is the role of each ant in collective transport? Rules that govern their actions? • Can we apply this to robots who, like ants. have limited sensing, communication, and computation capabilities? 14

  16. Critique Paper 2 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Insights • Ants grab stuff in groups (better than robots do). • The ant approach is decentralized, scalable, a requires no a priori information. • Therefore, ants are more flexible and more robust than centralized approach. • Prey transport teams are superefficient. 15

  17. Critique Paper 2 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Approach • Observe ants in a controlled environment. • Develop a behavior model. • Run a simulation to see if the model matches. 16

  18. Critique Paper 2 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Experiment • Fabricate fake food (out of springs and fig paste) and measure the forces and deformations as ants carry it back to the nest (about 1 meter). • 27 Trials 17

  19. Critique Paper 2 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Results (Observation) • Quasi-static motion • More ants is better (faster) • Load speed saturation with increased group size 18

  20. Critique Paper 2 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Results (Simulation) • Hybrid system with probabilistic transitions between two task modes: • search for grasp point • transport • Start from uniformly randomly distributed positions and orientations 19

  21. Critique Paper 2 Problem Insights Approach Experiment Results Critique • Friction is a major factor which throws the deformation measures off. • They even observe “stick-slip” motion. 20

  22. Closing Thoughts • Both use ants as a model of homogenous agents and minimal communication. • Both attempt to apply lessons from ants to distributed robotics. • Both simulations use very simple models, while still being reasonably accurate. 21

  23. Questions? • The Self-Organizing Exploratory Pattern of the Argentine Ant • Study of Group Food Retrieval by Ants as a Model for Multi-Robot Collective Transport 22

More Related