1 / 10

Impact Fee Roundtable: Improvement-Driven Approaches and Methodologies in Arlington

Join experts in a session discussing improvement-driven fees with national impact, featuring conceptual frameworks, road fee examples, taxonomy alternatives, and vital plan requirements. Explore plan-based and standard-based methodologies, essential characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. Discover state law requirements and typical features, assessing when plan-based approaches are warranted.

nanda
Télécharger la présentation

Impact Fee Roundtable: Improvement-Driven Approaches and Methodologies in Arlington

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improvement-Driven Fees National Impact Fee Roundtable Arlington, VA October 5, 2006

  2. Session Outline • Clancy Mullen (15 minutes) • Conceptual framework • Randy Young (15 minutes) • Road impact fee example • Joe Colgan (15 minutes) • Alternative taxonomy • Panel Discussion (15 minutes) • Q&A (15 minutes)

  3. Overview • Alternative Methodologies • Plan-Based • Standard-Based • Essential Characteristics • Plan Requirements in State Laws • Advantages and Disadvantages

  4. Alternative Methodologies • Plan-Based (Improvements-Driven) • Standard-Based (Demand-Driven, Consumption-Based, Buy-in, Incremental Expansion)

  5. Essential Characteristics of Plan-Based Methodologies • Geographic LOS standard • All roads function at LOS D or better • Drainage adequate for 100-year storm • A park within one mile of every house • Minimum 5-minute fire response time • A 10-year to 20-year master plan • Growth projections for planning period • Improvements needed to serve growth at adopted/desired standard • Fee = Total Cost divided by Growth

  6. Essential Characteristics of Standard-Based Methodologies • System-wide LOS standard • Park acres/1,000 population • Road system VMC/VMT ratio • Fire station sq. ft./dwelling unit • Gallons/day per single-family equivalent • Permanent school stations per student • Existing facilities cost per demand unit • Total cost / capacity = unit cost • Fee = unit cost x units needed

  7. Comparative Typical Features

  8. State Law Requirements • 27 states have enabling acts • 30% no requirements (FL, AZ, CO, WA..) • 20% require only a list (AR, OR, UT, WI..) • 50% require growth projections • Typical requirements • Growth projections • List of needed projects and costs • Only attributable share used in fee calc. • TX: max fee = growth costs/growth

  9. Advantages/Disadvantages

  10. When Plan-Based is Warranted • Complex, geographic-based LOS • Master plans available • Community approaching build-out

More Related