1 / 16

Providing Justifications in Recommender Systems

Providing Justifications in Recommender Systems. Presenter : Keng -Yu Lin Author : Panagiotis Symeonidis , Alexandros Nanopoulos , and Yannis Manolopoulos IEEE. 2008. Outlines. Motivation Objectives Methodology Experiments Conclusions Comments. Motivation.

nansen
Télécharger la présentation

Providing Justifications in Recommender Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Providing Justifications in Recommender Systems Presenter : Keng-Yu Lin Author : PanagiotisSymeonidis, AlexandrosNanopoulos, and YannisManolopoulos IEEE. 2008

  2. Outlines • Motivation • Objectives • Methodology • Experiments • Conclusions • Comments

  3. Motivation Existing recommended systems miss the interaction between the user and his favorite features that can be used for justifying a recommendation. Existing recommended systems cannot detect partial matching of the user’s preferences. Existing recommended systems lack metrics to evaluate the quality of justifications.

  4. Objectives • This paper propose a novel approach to solve aforementioned problem.

  5. Methodology This paper propose to capture the interaction between users and their favorite features by constructing a feature profile.

  6. Methodology xMotif algorithm Creating groups of users

  7. Methodology Weighted user-feature matrix

  8. Methodology Mango iPhone Android U={u1,u2}, I={HTC,Transformer} Neighborhood formation

  9. Methodology Item I7 is recommended, because it contains feature f1, which is included in item I1 you have rated. sum W(I1)=1 W(I7)=2+1=3 fr(f1)=2 fr(f3)=1 Generating the recommendation and justification lists

  10. Methodology Coverage=((1+1+2+2) / (1+3+3+3))*100%=60% Coverage

  11. Experiments Precision and explain coverage of FWNB versus a for (a) MovieLensand (b) Reuters data sets.

  12. Experiments Comparison between SF, CFCB, and FWNB in terms of explain coverage versus N for (a) MovieLens and (b) Reuters data sets.

  13. Experiments Comparison between IB, CFCB, and FWNB in terms of precision versus recall for (a) MovieLens and (b) Reuters data sets.

  14. Experiments Result of user survey

  15. Conclusions This paper propose an approach to attain both accurate and justifiable recommendations.

  16. Comments • Advantage • Applications • Recommended systems

More Related