1 / 13

Common Issues Defense Strategy

Common Issues Defense Strategy. James G. Martingano MehaffyWeber Houston, TX. Introduction. Common Themes Single event Multiple parties Common Sources of Proof Common Problems Scope Inherent Delay/Duplication Discovery Finality. Main Types. Class Action statutory MDL statutory

nantai
Télécharger la présentation

Common Issues Defense Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Common IssuesDefense Strategy James G. Martingano MehaffyWeber Houston, TX

  2. Introduction • Common Themes • Single event • Multiple parties • Common Sources of Proof • Common Problems • Scope • Inherent Delay/Duplication • Discovery • Finality

  3. Main Types • Class Action • statutory • MDL • statutory • Mass Tort/Consolidated Cases • Generally common law

  4. Mass Tort vs. Class Action • Similarities • Jurisdiction (State or Federal) • Focus (case disposition) • Differences • Procedure (Federal vs. State) • Scope (limited vs. general)

  5. Federal Class Actions • Federal Rule 23 • 1938 • 3 types • True • Spurious • Hybrid • “Opt-In” • 1966 • Criteria • Numerosity • Commonality • Typicality • “Opt-Out”

  6. Class Actions • Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 • Tort Reform • Expanded Federal Jurisdiction • Limits on Coupon Settlements • Trends • Personal Injury • Consumer • Employment • State Court • Range of options • California – most complex

  7. A Brief History of MDL • Federal MDLs created in 1968 • 28 U.S.C. § 1407 • “common questions of fact” • “centralization is for the convenience of the parties and promotes just and efficient conduct of litigation

  8. Current Data on Federal MDLs • 310 MDLs in over 60 Federal Districts • 240 Judges overseeing one or more MDLs • 92,000 pending individual cases • Of which 48,000 are asbestos • 15% of the entire Federal Court docket

  9. MDL Highlights • Breast Implant • Established Scientific Panel to evaluate Daubert Motion • Global Settlement • Welding Rod • Bellwether Trials • Chinese Dry Wall • Consumer and Personal Injury • Jurisdiction • Vioxx • Settlement • Asbestos • Still pending • Largest caseload – 40,000+ • Toyota Litigation • personal injury and consumer claims

  10. Class Action Highlights • Wal Mart • Largest gender discrimination class action recently certified • Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, Northern District of California • AT&T • Overtime wage claims • Wlotkowski et al. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Eastern District of Michigan.

  11. Herb Zarov • Personal Injury Issues related to Consolidated Cases • Case Management Orders • Defenses • Strategy • Hypothetical Case Study

  12. Carla Christofferson • Punitive Damages in Class Actions • Exxon Valdez • Standing Issues • Tobacco II

  13. Carolyn Frantz • No-Injury Class Actions • Teflon • BPA

More Related