1 / 23

Didem Takinacı, Müfit Zeki Karagülle Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty,

Comparison of 2 Different Spa Therapy Regimens in the M anagement of Chronic Low Back Pain; Single Blind Randomize Controlled Trial. Didem Takinacı, Müfit Zeki Karagülle Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology. Objective.

nathan
Télécharger la présentation

Didem Takinacı, Müfit Zeki Karagülle Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of 2 Different Spa Therapy Regimens in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain; Single Blind Randomize Controlled Trial Didem Takinacı, Müfit Zeki Karagülle Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology

  2. Objective • We aimed to determine the effectiveness of spa therapy in short and long term on functions and pain, in chronic low back pain • To compare two different spa therapy program in chronic low back pain.

  3. Study design • Randomized • Controlled • Single blind • Follow up 6 months

  4. Study Diagram Patient with chronic back pain Assesment in musculosceletal polyclinic in our department 50 Patients randomized into two groups 44 patient completed 3. month measurements n=20 Spa therapy(pool-bath tub) n=24 Spa+exercise therapy 2 weeks duration Pool-bath tub Gönen Spa Hotel 2 Weeks duration Pool-bath tub- exercises Gönen Spa Hotel outcome measurements Before therapy- end of therapy and 3. month outcome measurements at the same times İn our department 19 patient completed 3. month 1 patient didn’t come to 3rd.month measurement 24 patient completed 3. month

  5. Balneotherapy group (n:20) Stay at Gönen Spa Hotel Balneotherapy + exercise therapy group (n:24) Stay at Gönen Spa Hotel Study Groups

  6. Patients

  7. Balneotherapy Group Thermomineral water (Na, SO4, HCO3, Cl, Fl) Once a day- in thermal pool 36-37ºC 20 minutes duration Once a day- in bath tub 38ºC 20 minutes duration

  8. Balneotherapy+Exercise Group Once a day- in thermal pool 36-37ºC 20 minutes duration Once a day- in bath tub 38ºC 20 minutes duration Once a day Williams exercises 15 minutes duration

  9. Williams’ Flexion Exercises Pelvic Tilt:lie on back with knees bent and feet flat. Flatten small of back against floor. Single and Double Knee to Chest: lie on back with knees bent, slowly pull knees or knee toward the chest. Partial sit-up: do pelvic tilt and slowly curl head an shoulders off the floor. Hip flexor stretch: place one foot in front of the other with knee flexed. Flex forward through the trunk until the opposite knee contracts the auxiliary fold. Hamstring Stretch: sitting with legs and toes forward, slowly lower trunk forward and over the legs. Squat: stand with feet parallel maintaining trunk stabilization, lower the body by flexing the knees.

  10. Uncontrolled Factors • Resting • Regular daily rhythm • Close contact with health professionals • Change of environment

  11. Outcome measures • Pain(VAS) • Patient’s global assessment (VAS) • Doctor’s global assessment (VAS) • Health assessment questionnaire - HAQ • WOMAC OA index • WADDELL • Finger-floor distance • Schober index

  12. Outcome measures • Before spa therapy • After spa therapy (within a week) • Long term • 3. month • 6. month

  13. Pain-VAS • Significant reduction was seen in Pain VAS scores in both groups. P=0,000 P=0,000 P=0,000 P=0,001

  14. Patient’s global assesment (VAS) • Significant reduction was seen in both groups. P=0,000 P=0,001 P=0,000 P=0,001

  15. Doctor’s global assesment (VAS) • Significant reduction was seen in both groups. P=0,000 P=0,000 P=0,000 P=0,000

  16. HAQ • Significant reduction was seen in both groups. P=0,014 P=0,001 P=0,006 P=0,015

  17. WOMAC-total • Significant reduction was seen in both groups. P=0,002 P=0,000 P=0,001 P=0,007

  18. Function WADDELL • Improvement (not significant) in balneotherapy+exercise group at the end of spa therapy and significant improvement at 3. month. • Significant improvement in balneotherapy group at the end of spa therapy and at 3. month. P=0,128 P=0,02 P=0,000 P=0,000

  19. Finger-Floor Distance(cm) • Significantreduction was seen in both groups. P=0,006 P=0,007 P=0,022 P=0,026

  20. Schober (cm) • Improvement in both groups at the end of spa therapy and at 3. month, but significant only in balneotherapy + exercise group at 3. month. P=0,024 P=0,218 P=0,081 P=0,092

  21. Conclusion • In our trial, both 2 week-spa therapy regimens are effective in reducing pain and improving function and spinal mobility and flexibility. • The significant improvement in Schober Index seen at 3 month in balneotherapy + exercise group seems the only advantage of added exercise therapy.

  22. Conclusion • Spa therapy combining balneotherapy and exercise therapy seems having advantage in improving mobility and flexibility in patient with chronic low back pain. • However, it is needed further well designed randomized controlled trials with a higher number of patients in both groups with a sufficient power to show the superiority of combined spa therapy.

  23. Thank you !!

More Related