1 / 17

* e-Government and environment:

THE INFORMATION SOCIETY – FROM DECLARATION TO IMPLEMENTATION Organized by the UN Regional Commissions in connection with the WSIS Cluster of Events Palais des Nations, Geneva 21 May 2007. * e-Government and environment:

nathanthompson
Télécharger la présentation

* e-Government and environment:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE INFORMATION SOCIETY – FROM DECLARATION TO IMPLEMENTATIONOrganized by the UN Regional Commissions in connection with the WSIS Cluster of EventsPalais des Nations, Geneva21 May 2007 * e-Government and environment: e-participation in environmental decision-making under the Aarhus Convention Jeremy Wates, Secretary to the Aarhus Convention, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

  2. « Electronic information tools can enable us to work collectively for more inclusive political processes, allowing genuine participation of all citizens in all countries and broadening our joint quest for sustainable development. » Ms. Brigita Schmögnerová, former Executive Secretary of UNECE (2002-2005), ‘Information and Communication Technologies for Environmental Democracy’, UNECE side event to WSIS-1, Geneva, December 2003

  3. Environmental footprint of ICT:plusses and minuses The democracy dimension: ICT as a tool for creating more inclusive societies

  4. The quest for environmental sustainability… ICT has the potential to significantly reduce environmental impacts: Teleworking Virtual conferencing Paperless offices Efficiencies in distribution of products and services But how much is it really happening?

  5. … and the challenges Global population forecast to rise from 6.5bn to 9.4bn by 2050 Number of Internet users increasing at 10+% per year from 964m in 2005 to 1.78bn by 2010 increased energy and resource consumption, increased waste generation

  6. Energy consumption Electricity demand from servers doubled worldwide 2000-2005 Servers with cooling and auxiliary infrastructure alone account for 1.2% US electricity consumption Additional power demand from manufacture of memory chips, commercial and end users equipment

  7. e-waste Escalating sources of e-waste: computers, mobile phones, TVs, VCRs, sound systems, copiers, etc E-waste market set to grow at 8.8% per year 100,000 obsolete computers arriving in Lagos per month

  8. Greening the Information Society Efforts to bridge the digital divide should be coupled with increased efforts to address ICT’s environmental footprint Cradle-to-grave assessment of ICTs so as to minimise environmental impact from their production, use and disposal Uses of ICT to cut energy and resource use Preventing illicit transboundary movement of e-waste

  9. ICT as a tool for promoting more democratic, inclusive societies Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992): A broad international consensus on the need to promote access to information, public participation and access to justice in environmental matters Geneva Plan of Action (2003): « The objectives of the Plan of Action are to build an inclusive Information Society… » Tunis Commitment (2005): « a people-centred, inclusive and development oriented Information Society »

  10. Aarhus Convention 1998 Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters In the UNECE region, Principle 10 developed into a legally binding convention Negotiated 1996-98, adopted 1998, entered into force 2001, two meetings of the Parties 2002 and 2005 Environmental democracy treaty at the interface between human rights and environmental sustainability Seeks to strengthen the transparency and accountability of government Grants rights to the public and imposes obligations on public authorities

  11. An international legal framework driving public access Main legal framework promoting environmental democracy in Europe and Central Asia 41 Parties, including the EC Three pillars: information, participation and justice Information pillar: passive/reactive, in response to requests (art. 4) Proactive dissemination (art. 5) Electronic access promoted in both reactive and proactive provisions

  12. Changing forms of access Interplay between legislation and technology Technology determines the possibilities for public access (the ‘how’), policy determines if info is public (the ‘whether’) Paradigm shift from ‘linear transmission’ to ‘network’ model Info upon request  info in the ‘public domain’ ICT allows different quality of access (low-cost, any time, electronically searchable)

  13. Promoting electronic access Aarhus Parties required to ensure that environmental info progressively becomes available in electronic databases that are accessible to public through telecommunications networks (art. 5.3) Obligation further elaborated at MoP-2 in recommendations on more effective use of e-tools (Decision II/3) Implementation of Decision II/3 assessed through questionnaire survey Findings reveal positive trends in all subregions, e.g. widespread establishment of web portals on environmental info, but limited use of e-participation

  14. Pollution registers – a specific case of electronic access Aarhus requires all Parties to take steps towards establishing pollution registers (art. 5.9) Kiev Protocol on pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTR) adopted in 2003 Protocol requires its Parties to establish national electronic register, publicly accessible through Internet, of quantities of certain listed pollutants released or transferred from certain listed activities by enterprises, maintained through mandatory annual reporting by enterprises Goal: each member of the public should be able to find out about significant sources of pollution in his/her backyard

  15. Transparency versus security Post-9/11 concerns about security leading to slowdown and even reversal of access policy in some countries Collection of information by governments to combat terrorism (e.g. increased CCTV surveillance) combined with reduced access by individuals suggests another kind of ‘information society’ Transparency and participation can be tools to promote security (« Violence and social exclusion are two sides of the same coin » - Irene Khan, Secretary-General, Amnesty International)

  16. Aarhus Clearinghouse for Environmental Democracy Launched in July 2004 a global electronic portal bringing together info on laws and practices relevant to the public’s right to information, participation and justice More than 1000 entries (resources) http://www.unece.org/env/pp http://aarhusclearinghouse.unece.org

More Related