1 / 10

APGrid PMA: Stauts

APGrid PMA: Stauts. Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio.tanaka@aist.go.jp) Grid Technology Research Center, AIST, Japan. India. ApGrid: Asia Pacific Partnership for Grid Computing. Open community for Grid researchers in Asia Pacific ApGrid can be

nau
Télécharger la présentation

APGrid PMA: Stauts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APGrid PMA: Stauts Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio.tanaka@aist.go.jp) Grid Technology Research Center, AIST, Japan

  2. India ApGrid: Asia Pacific Partnership for Grid Computing • Open community for Grid researchers in Asia Pacific • ApGrid can be • A meeting point for all Grid researchers in Asia-Pacific • A communication channel to the GGF, and other grid communities • A pool for finding international project partners

  3. Pacific Rim Application and Grid Middleware Assembly • NSF-funded project lead by UCSD/SDSC. • 1st workshop was held in March 2002. • Establish sustained collaborations and advance the use of the Grid technologies for applications. • Expected outcomes: • Advance scientific applications • Increase productive and effective use of the grid by researchers and scientists in the Pacific Rim • Increase interoperability of grid middleware in Pacific Rim and throughout the world Tightly collaborating with ApGrid. Having workshops 2~3 times a year.

  4. 言語と文字 Testbed in Asia Pacific – unique features – • Truly (naturally) multi national/political/institutional VO beyond boundaries • Not an application-dedicated testbed – general platform • Diversity of languages, culture, policy, interests, … • Grid BYO – Grass roots approach • Each institution contributes his resources for sharing • Not a single source funded for the development • Physical resources • Most contributed resources are small-scale clusters • Networking is there, however the bandwidth is not enough • We can • have experiences on running international VO • verify the feasibility of this approach for the testbed development

  5. Grids in Asia Pacific • Architecture, technology • Based on GT2 • Allow multiple CAs • Build MDS Tree • Grid middleware/tools from Asia Pacific • Ninf-G (GridRPC programming) • Nimrod-G (parametric modeling system) • SCMSWeb (resource monitoring) • Grid Data Farm (Grid File System), etc. • Status • 22 organizations (10 countries) • 23 clusters (1688 CPUs)

  6. globus globus globus globus globus globus globus globus globus CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA Grass-roots Approach (strategy) ApGrid GIIS • Assumption • Each institution has installed GT2 • Necessary steps • Gather and exchange trusted CA info. and trust with each other • Configure MDS to build an ApGrid MDS tree • For application use • Install additional software in project-basis

  7. Status and problems • Most participating organizations have less interests in Security • Many participants are application people • Not enough human resources working on security • Satisfy in using Globus Simple CA without providing CP/CPS • This would be acceptable inside AP for experimental use. • potential/ongoing collaboration with US and EUe.g.: • AIST/Japan – TeraGrid • KISTI/Korea – PPDG and iVDGL • ASCC/Taiwan – LCG • … • Need to launch production level CAs

  8. APGrid PMA: Asia Pacific Grid PMA • General Policy Management Authority in Asia Pacific • Launched on June 1st, 2004 • Defines minimum CA requirements • APGrid PMA approved that we accept two levels of CA: • Experimental-level CA • Alternative of the Globus CA • Can be trusted within A-P communities • Production-level CA • Strict management is necessary • Expected to be trusted by international communities • KISTI GRID CA and AIST GRID CA has been approved as a production level CA • ASGC CA are under reviewing their CP/CPS (expected to be approved shortly) • Australia has a plan to launch a new production-level CA

  9. Questions (examples) • Can TeraGrid trust AIST GRID CA? • How is the procedure for reviewing? • Do AIST GRID CA need to be reviewed by individual organizations (NCSA, PSC, SDSC, …)? • If KISTI GRID CA wish to be trusted by TeraGrid, is separate review necessary? • Can DOEGrid PMA be responsible? • Can APGrid PMA help? • Can ApGrid/PRAGMA trust TeraGrid CA? • How is the procedure for reviewing? • Do ApGrid/PRAGMA need to review all CAs (NCSA, PSC, SDSC, etc.)? • Can APGrid PMA be responsible? • Can DOEGrid PMA help? • KEK/Japan may launch a new CA. • Do the CA need to be reviewed by EUGrid PMA? • Can APGrid PMA help? • How do we keep consistency of CP/CPS? • Recently, Academia Sinica revised the CP/CPS

  10. More Information • APGrid PMA • http://www.apgridpma.org/ • ApGrid • http://www.apgrid.org/ • PRAGMA • http://www.pragma-grid.net/ • NAREGI • http://www.naregi.org/ • GTRC/AIST • http://www.gtrc.aist.go.jp/ • My email address • yoshio.tanaka@aist.go.jp

More Related