1 / 26

Semileptonic B Decays at BABAR

Semileptonic B Decays at BABAR. Vladimir Golubev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia (for the BaBar Collaboration). Beauty 2005 Assisi (Perugia), June 20 – 24, 2005. Semileptonic B Decays – Why are they Interesting. +. Semileptonic decays

neal
Télécharger la présentation

Semileptonic B Decays at BABAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semileptonic B Decays at BABAR Vladimir Golubev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia (for the BaBar Collaboration) Beauty 2005 Assisi (Perugia), June 20–24, 2005

  2. Semileptonic B Decays – Why are they Interesting + • Semileptonic decays • theoretically simple at parton level • rate depends on CKM elements |Vcb| and|Vub|, the quark masses mb and mc • the leptonic current factors out cleanly, thus one can probe strong interactions in B mesons • sensitive to QCD corrections, OPE • A precise determination of |Vcb| and |Vub| with reliable errors important for • understanding B decay rates • testing of the unitarity of the CKM matrix and predictions of CP violation in B mesons Beauty2005, Assisi

  3. Semileptonic B decay studies at BABAR 2-nd B tagging: untagged, lepton tag, hadronic tag Beauty2005, Assisi

  4. Inclusive BXcln decays: HQE Expansions • Heavy Quark Expansions, tool to correct for QCD effects • Expansion in terms of 1/mb and as(mb) • Separate short-andlong-distanceeffects at m~ 1 GeV • Perturbative corrections calculable from mbmcas(mb) • Non-perturbativeparameters cannot be calculated • We choose calculation by Gambino & Uraltsev hep-ph/0401063 & 0403166 • Kinetic mass scheme to • Eℓ moments • mX moments • 8 parameters to be fitted • Measure 8 moments, each as a function of minimum lepton energy El kinetic chromomagnetic spin-orbit Darwin Beauty2005, Assisi

  5. Measurement of Electron Energy Moments BABAR Albert et al. Phys.Rev. D 69, 111104 (2004) 47 + 9 /fb • Inclusive e± spectrum in 3x106 electron-tagged (1.4<p*<2.3GeV/c) BB events • Corrected for detector effects • Corrected for non-prompt electrons – lepton charge correlation and MC • Corrected for B0 – B0 mixing • Moments for Ecut = 0.6 … 1.5 GeV • Corrected for the final state radiation • Translated to B rest frame • Subtracted B  Xuℓn decays 156,000 e± Partial BF Lepton Energy Moments Beauty2005, Assisi

  6. high mass charm states Mx2[GeV2/c4] Measurement of Hadron Mass Moments Aubert et al. Phys.Rev. D 69, 111103 (2004) BABAR 7114 Events Events/0.5 GeV2 • BB events tagged by a fully reconstructed hadronic B decays • e± or m± with El > Ecut(0.9…1.6 GeV/c) • Lepton charge – B flavor correlation • Improve mx measurement by kinematic fit to whole event, resolution ~350 MeV • To eliminate dependence of moments on uncertain BF and unknown masses of high mass charm mesons we calibrate mx measurement • Calibrate mx based on MC simulation • Linear relation between mxmeas and mXtrue • Validate calibration with excl. B D(*) ln • Moments corrected for detector effects and bkg D, D* mX2 (GeV2) mxmeas (Gev) Hadron mass moments Beauty2005, Assisi mXtrue (GeV)

  7. HQE Fits to Hadron Mass and Lepton Energy Moments Aubert et al. Phys.Rev.Lett. 93, 011803 (2004) ● = used, ○ = unusedin the nominal fit BABAR MX moments M1x M2x M4x M3x M0l M3l M1l M2l Red line: HQE fitYellow band: theory errors c2/ndf = 20/15 Eℓmoments Beauty2005, Assisi

  8. HQE Fit Results(kinetic mass scheme, scale m=1GeV) BABAR • Separate fits to hadron and lepton moments give consistent results • mG2 and rLS3 are consistent with B-B* mass splitting and HQ sum rules • Considerable improvement in precision for |Vcb| (±2%)and Bcln (1.6%) and quark masses, as well as HQE parameters Beauty2005, Assisi

  9. |Vub| from total B Xuln decay rate • Total b  u ℓ  decay rate from OPE: • |Vub| from inclusive BF(B  Xu l n) (theory error 5%): • Experimentally challenging due to charmed semileptonic background: Beauty2005, Assisi

  10. Charmed semileptonic background can be controlled in limited regions of phase space Non-perturbative Shape Functions are used to extract |Vub| from partial branching fractions. The SF parameters are extracted from b  sg photon spectrum New approach to |Vub| extraction: |Vub| from partial B Xuln decay rates • Differential decay rate parametrization from BLNP Bosch, Lange, Neubert, and Paz, Nucl. Phys. B 699, 335 (2004); Lange, Neubert, and Paz, hep-ph/0504071 • New source of information on SF parameters – moments of the b  c ℓ n lepton spectrum Neubert, Phys.Lett. B 612, 13 (2005) Beauty2005, Assisi

  11. Different types of partial decay rate measurements: - electron endpoint - Ee and q2 regions with neutrino reconstruction - Mx and q2 regions |Vub| from partial B Xuln decay rates hep-ex/0408075 hep-ex/0506036 hep-ex/0408068 q2(Gev/c)2vs. Ee(GeV) q2(Gev/c)2vs. Mx(GeV) q2=(pl+pn)2 Kinematic regions of BXcln decays Beauty2005, Assisi

  12. |Vub| from B Xuln endpoint spectrum On-peak data Off-peak data (On-peak)-(Off-peak) data Histogram – B XclnMC (On-peak)-(Off-peak) data Histogram – B XulnMC Differential B Xue nbranching fraction as a function of electron momentum, corrected for detector effects and final-state radiation (On-peak)−(Off-peak) data Histogram – B  XulnMC Signal extraction: subtraction of BB and continuum background Beauty2005, Assisi

  13. Endpoint spectrum analysis: |Vub| extraction • Determination of DBr for pe>pmin • Extrapolation to total charmless semileptonic decay Br using shape function parameters from B  Xsg spectrum and calculations of DeFazio-Neubert(*) and Kagan-Neubert(**) • Extraction of |Vub| using the OPE relation. • BABAR preliminary results, based on BELLE shape function parameters and DFN approach (hep-ex/0408075): DBr(pe>2.0GeV/c)=(0.5310.032stat0.049syst)×10-3 Br=(2.16 0.24exp 0.27SF)×10-3 |Vub|=(4.40 0.24exp 0.28SF 0.21OPE+mb)×10−3 • Analysis based on BLNP calculation is being completed (*) F.De Fazio and M.Neubert, JHEP 9906, 017 (1999) (**) A.L.Kagan and M.Neubert, Eur.Phys.J. C 7, 5 (1999) Beauty2005, Assisi

  14. Event selection: High energy electron Ee>2GeV Missing momentum used for neutrino parameters estimation Cuts on missing momentum magnitude and direction, and event shape Suppression of b®cenbyshmax=m2D: (slightly modified for B -meson motion in the U(4S) rest frame) q2 − Ee analysis with neutrino reconstruction Acceptance ~ 14%, signal/bkg.~0.6 Beauty2005, Assisi

  15. BABAR preliminary q2 − Ee analysis results Test of neutrino energy resolution using pure control sample of B®D(*)en events Signal extraction for Ee>2.0 GeV and sh<3.5 GeV2, BB background normalization for sh>4.25 GeV2, DBr(Ee>2.0GeV, sh<3.5GeV2)=(3.54±0.33±0.34) ´10-4 (*) B.O.Lange, M.Neubert and G.Paz, hep-ph/0504071 Beauty2005, Assisi

  16. Signal downfeed bcln + other Mx−q2 analysis • Select events with a fully reconstructed B  D(*)X decay (Breco) • Study charmless semileptonic decay of B recoiling against Breco - require lepton with p*lep > 1 GeV • 2D fit to measure partial BF in [Mx<1.7 GeV, q2>8 GeV2] hep-ex/0408068 Mx < 1.7 GeV 1.7 < Mx < 2.2 GeV 2.2 < Mx < 2.8 GeV 82 fb-1 Beauty2005, Assisi

  17. Mx−q2 analysis: the results BABAR preliminary (CKM 2005) • Mx spectrum unfolding and fitting: • Mx−q22-dimentional fit: (*) F.De Fazio and M.Neubert, JHEP 9906, 017 (1999) (**) Bauer, Ligeti and Luke, hep-ph/0111387 Beauty2005, Assisi

  18. BABAR preliminary Inclusive B Xuln decay summary Beauty2005, Assisi

  19. ISGW2 Ball’04 FNAL’04 HPQCD’04 |Vub| from exclusive B Xuln decays Strong nonperturbative effects included in form factors Calculations • Light-Cone Sum Rules: Ball,Zwicky (hep-ph/0406232) • Unquenched Lattice QCD: HPQCD (hep-lat/0408019) and FNAL (hep-lat/0409116) • ISGW2: quark model q2 = (plep + pn )2 Beauty2005, Assisi

  20. Different experimental approaches to measure BF: Exclusive decays, experimental techniques PURITY EFFICIENCY Untagged analysis Neutrino reconstruction B  ℓ , B  ℓ  Semileptonic Tags Recoil of B  D(*) ℓ n B  ℓ  Recoil of B  D(*)X 9 channels (p,r,,,’,a0) Hadronic Tags Beauty2005, Assisi

  21. Use BD(*)ln decays of opposite B to “tag” event Use events with BD(*)ln decays on both sides to check tagging efficiency Measure DB(B0p-l+n) in bins of q2 BF for B+p0l+n l D(*) v tag B signal B v p l Exclusive B pln decays, tagged analysis Discriminating Variables • B0 p-l+n: angle between the B momentum and the plane defined by the D(*)l and pl momenta: cos2fB • B+ p0l+n: angle between B and p0l system: cos B-pl Beauty2005, Assisi

  22. B plntagged analysis: the results BABAR preliminary (CKM 2005) B0p-l+n on-peak datasignal MCBrlv MCb ¨ ulv MCB0B0 MCB+B− MCoff-peak data 232 million BB pairs B+p0l+n Branching Fraction Results in 3 bins of q2 88 million BB pairs Beauty2005, Assisi

  23. Exclusive B p(r)ln decays, untagged analysis • Reconstruct neutrino from full event + ensure good reconstruction quality • Signal yield extracted from common fit to DE and mES in 5 q2bins for p+ln, and 3 bins for r-lnandr0lneach q2 resolution neutrino momentum scaled so DE=0  improved q2 resolution Beauty2005, Assisi

  24. Data Signal MC Comb. Sig. Crossfeed bcln qq Untagged B p(r)ln, signal extraction BABAR preliminary Bp-l+n Brln Branching Fraction Results 83 million BB pairs Beauty2005, Assisi

  25. BABAR preliminary (CKM 2005) Form factor fits and |Vub| extraction pln rln Untagged • The pln untagged sample begins to distinguish among FF calculations: ISGW II is disfavored: Prob(c2) = 3% • Other FF calculations tested are compatible with data Extraction of |Vub| Beauty2005, Assisi

  26. Summary • HQE fits to moments hadronic mass and lepton energy moments: Based on 80 fb-1, ~30% of the current BABAR data, we have made significant advances in the analysis of semileptonic B decays. Br(B Xcln)= (10.61 ±0.16exp ±0.06 HQE)% High precision measurement of mb and mc, and exp. determination of HQE parameters. • Inclusive B Xuln decays, three different approaches: The most precise determination of |Vub| Measurement of partial semileptonic branching fractions for different kinematic regions • Exclusive B p(r)ln decay modes in tagged and untagged samples: Determination of |Vub| Begin to test decay form factor calculations The analyses will be repeated for larger data samples and more precise shape function parameters derived from from B Xsg photon spectrum Beauty2005, Assisi

More Related