1 / 27

Association of Energy Engineers

AB 32 Overview. Association of Energy Engineers. Charles M. Shulock, Assistant Executive Officer California Air Resources Board March 13, 2008. AB 32 Basics. Signed by the Governor in September 2006 Sets in statute Governor’s 2020 target ARB to monitor/regulate GHG sources

nealdawson
Télécharger la présentation

Association of Energy Engineers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AB 32 Overview Association of Energy Engineers Charles M. Shulock, Assistant Executive Officer California Air Resources Board March 13, 2008

  2. AB 32 Basics • Signed by the Governor in September 2006 • Sets in statute Governor’s 2020 target • ARB to monitor/regulate GHG sources • Market approaches allowed, but not required • Air Resources Board lead, but: • Cal/EPA and Climate Action Team continue statewide climate policy coordination • Other agency authority preserved • Role of CPUC and CEC explicitly recognized • ARB must consult on all energy related matters

  3. California Climate Change Emissions 3

  4. GHG Reductions Required • By 2020 California must reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels • Collectively this means reducing: • Today’s levels by 15% • Projected levels by 28% • Emission intensity by 33%

  5. ~173 MMT CO2e Reduction 1990 Emission Baseline 80% Reduction ~341 MMT CO2e Magnitude of the Challenge

  6. CO2 Intensity Comparisons(Fossil Fuel Combustion Only) 25.00 United States 20.00 Netherlands Australia Canada 15.00 Belgium Tons of CO2 per person California Denmark Germany 10.00 Austria Japan New S. Korea Zealand Italy Switzerland France 5.00 Mexico 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Intensity (tons of CO2 per 2000 US Dollar)

  7. AB 32 Timeline 2012 2011 2010 2008 2009 2020 2007 Identification/ implementation of further emission reduction strategies GHG reduction measures operative Publish list of early actions Mandatory reporting & 1990 Baseline Publish scoping plan Reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels Adopt enforceable early action regulations GHG reduction measures adopted

  8. Accomplished in 2007 • Approval of potential early action items • Low carbon fuel standard, auto refrigerants, landfill gas, truck efficiency, port electrification, semiconductor perflurocarbons, can propellants, tire inflation, sulfur hexafluoride • To be considered by early 2009 • Would reduce 16 MMT -- CAT has other potential actions

  9. Accomplished in 2007 • Set 1990 GHG inventory at 427 MMT • Requires 173 MMT Reduction by 2020 • Adopted mandatory reporting requirement for major GHG emitters • Begin tracking in 2008, begin reporting in 2009 • Adopted forestry protocol • Adopted port electrification

  10. Passenger Car Regulations Air Board Adopted Regulations in September 2004 Would provide largest single GHG reduction • Currently under court challenge from auto industry • US EPA rejected ARB’s waiver request • California now suing US EPA • Also studying other ways to get reductions from autos “There’s no legal basis for Washington to stand in our way”-- Governor Schwarzenegger 10

  11. Scoping Plan • Describes how California will reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 • Provide a vision for a low carbon future - 2020 and 2050 • Establish California’s leadership in climate change, while considering other GHG programs • Maximize benefits to California

  12. Scoping Plan Development

  13. Scoping Plan Measures • AB 32 requires ARB to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions • Possible measures include: • Direct regulations • Alternative compliance mechanisms • Market-based compliance mechanisms • Monetary and non-monetary incentives

  14. Scenarios for April 17 Workshop • All scenarios assume implementation of core measures: • Tailpipe GHG standards • Low carbon fuel standard • Energy efficiency beyond current programs • 20% RPS • Discrete early actions • Vehicle Miles Traveled reductions

  15. Scenarios for April 17 Workshop • Additional direct regulations • Three cap and trade scenarios • All large stationary industrial and commercial sources, including electricity generators • The above sectors, with regional or national trading • The above sectors plus transportation fuels, with trading regionally or nationally • A carbon fee applied to fuels throughout the California economy, at the distribution level

  16. Joint Development of Electricity Sector Recommendations • CPUC and CEC jointly developing recommendations for AB 32 implementation for entire electricity sector (IOU, muni, other) • Proposed decision released; will be voted on by CPUC and CEC in late March • ARB will integrate recommendations into broader economy-wide approach

  17. Joint Development of Electricity Sector Recommendations • Recommendations in Proposed Decision: • Regulate deliverer of electricity to CA markets • Make electric sector one of several in a larger cap-and-trade program • Some allowances should be auctioned • Allowance revenue should be used at least in part for the benefit of electricity consumers, such as to augment investments in efficiency and renewables or to provide customer bill relief

  18. Major Issues • Role of markets in overall program • Many existing regulations have compliance flexibility • Design issues • Scope and point of regulation • Allowance allocation • Use of offsets--should there be restriction (quantitative, geographic) • Environmental justice considerations

  19. Offsets • Offsets could play role in cap and trade or as alternative compliance for direct regulations • Issues to address include: • Validity/enforceability of the offsets • Which sources can be offsets • When can offsets be used • Geographic and/or quantitative limits

  20. Voluntary Early Actions • Voluntary early actions are win/win • Board adopted policy on February 28 to encourage voluntary action • Work with California Climate Action Registry to allow documentation of voluntary actions • Work with interested parties to review proposed quantification methodologies • Work with air districts to promote expedited development of quantification methods

  21. Environmental Justice Advisory Committee • To advise ARB on scoping plan and other matters pertinent to EJ & community groups • Members nominated by environmental justice and community groups • Major issues raised to date: • Reporting requirements • Potential impacts of Low Carbon Fuel Standard • Potential impacts of cap and trade program

  22. Economic and Technology Advancement Advisory Committee • To advise ARB on technology research and development opportunities • Representation from stakeholder groups, academia, technology experts • Presented report to Board on February 28

  23. ETAAC Recommendations • Five major strategies: • Accelerate GHG emission reductions • Balance a portfolio of economic andtechnology policies • Create innovative public funding tocomplement private investment • Foster international and domestic partnerships • Leadership across state agencies

  24. ETAAC Recommendations • Five major opportunities: • Accelerate efficiency measures • Remove carbon from energy sources • Rethink transportation to lower demand and carbon emissions • Reduce GHG emissions from industry, agriculture, forestry and water • Capture cleantech employment, economic, health, and environmental justice co-benefits

  25. Market Advisory Committee • Committee appointed by CalEPA • Final report released June 29, 2007 • Presented to ARB at July 2007 Board meeting • ARB will review Committee input and consider as part of public process • ARB responsible for program adoption

  26. Western Regional Climate Action Initiative • Set overall regional goal consistent with state by state goals • Develop design for regional market-based multi-sector mechanism (design due August 2008) • Participate in multi-state registry • Timing consistent with AB 32 needs

  27. Contacts and More Information • ARB Climate Change Web Site • http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/cc.htm • Stay informed - sign up for list serve • California Climate Change Portal • http://www.climatechange.ca.gov • Climate Page Point of Contact: Rich Varenchik rvarench@arb.ca.gov (626) 575-6730

More Related