SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Ensuring Effective Peer Review Conduct for Accreditation**

nelia avatar
nelia
25 diapositives · 362 Views · Aug 25, 2014

This document outlines the essential practices and commitments necessary for conducting a successful peer review process within the National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project. It emphasizes the importance of a smooth and effective developmental engagement, establishing a robust evidence base, and adhering to agreed priorities through flexible yet timely team planning. Key sections focus on observer participation, formative judgments, the production of the engagement report, and the competencies required for effective reporting. It serves as a guide for reviewers to maintain professionalism, confidentiality, and constructive feedback throughout the review process.

#ensuring effective peer review conduct for accreditation** #ensuring effective peer review conduct for accreditation** ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Ensuring Effective Peer Review Conduct for Accreditation** - slide 1
01 / 25Ensuring Effective Peer Review Conduct for Accreditation**
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Ensuring Effective Peer Review Conduct for Accreditation**
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

  2. Second Session

  3. Conduct of the peer review * Commitment * Contribution to a smooth and effective process * The Developmental Engagement Report October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  4. Commitment for the review process TimeEffort Mission Activities* criteria * protocols Show courtesy Comments Judgment Confidentiality October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  5. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement * Establishing a sound evidence base * Agreeing Priorities * Team planning TRD * Keeping to schedule but also flexible October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  6. Building on the evidence base Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement * FAR * Initial commentaries * Identify gaps and requests * Observations and meetings * Formative judgments October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  7. Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement The reviewer tools Observing Questioning Listening October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  8. Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement Relation to the facilitator Meeting attendance Daily Academic staff Final oral feedback But, he will not attend - Students - Stakeholders - Final meeting of review team October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  9. Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement Relation to the facilitator Significance of meeting attendance • Clarification on matters addressed in or omitted Understanding of line of enquiries • Matters • context of the institution’s activities October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  10. Feedback on the initial commentaries * Use the handbook * FAR & any supple. information * Record apparent (+) & (-) and further enquiry (?) * Identify of gaps, apparent inconsistencies and requests * Sharing of information & request * Activities during site visit * Formative judgment each day October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  11. Formal judgements When ? Requirements ? Characteristics ? Pit falls ? October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  12. The Developmental Engagement Report Essential qualities of the report Structure (annex Q) Skills of effective reporting Production of the report October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  13. Essential Qualities of a report Report Should be Compliant Annex Q Evaluative Judgment C orrectlearoncise All the team Fair Balanced October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  14. The Structure of the Reportreference Part 4 paragraphs 55-56 and annex Q * Preface * Executive Summary * Main text comprising • Introduction • Evaluation • Conclusions * Conclude that the [institution] EITHER [is ready to receive an accreditation visit] OR [is not yet ready to receive an accreditation visit.] * The strength include. * Matters that should be addressed before an accreditation visit are: October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  15. The skills of effective reporting Notes Evidence Test & verify Team Discussions Annexes I & Q Use Formative judgment October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  16. Cont. The skills of effective reporting Evaluative frame work Comments & suggestions Over defensive Drafts Trivial details October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  17. Production of the report Reference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and annex Q Sharing formative judgments & draft paragraphs in the team Decision-making in the team Making judgments + & -- Conclusion either / or Prepare oral feedback script (annex J) October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  18. Cont. Production of the report Reference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and annex Q After the site visit Polishing written report Editing stage (ref. para. 56) Send draft 3 Institution Send draft 4 NQAAC Completion in 20w with milestones October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  19. How to conduct meetings? Situation Task Action Result October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  20. How to deal with the staff members? Self esteem Constructive Job related Arguments Provide evidence Credible judgment October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  21. Success of the review process depends on Review team NQAAC Facilitator Institution October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  22. Thank you October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  23. Discussion October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  24. Group Exercises At end of this session you will be able to: 1- Apply the structure of the report 2- Apply the written guidelines on judgements for the production of the Report contained in Part 4 and Annex Q 3- Draft a section of a report using early draft paragraphs 4- Make and write judgements that are supported by evidence 5- Identify matters that require further evidence before sound judgements can be made 6- Consider what has been learned about making and reporting judgments supported by evidence October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

  25. Using the site-visit schedulereference Part 4 paragraphs 45 to 51 and annex H Group Exercise Using the schedule of a site-visit, and the faculty annual report, identify from the prompts in annex I and the list of documentation in paragraph 49 the best source(s) of evidence for satisfying the points (questions or ?) you raised in your initial commentaries. From this, prepare a brief check list for the team’s first team meeting. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project