External Evaluation HIV/AIDS Workplace Policies and Programmes GTZ / ILO Partnership 2003 - 2007

1. External EvaluationHIV/AIDS Workplace Policies and ProgrammesGTZ / ILO Partnership 2003 - 2007 Strategic Perspective and Impact

2. Beneficiary opinion ILO/GTZ-20070910

3. Report Validation Data analysis Country visits: Moldova & Ukraine Data collection: multiple processes Design of Survey to Assess Performance Collection and Review of Accounting Data Discussions with Project staff Desk Review Methodology ILO/GTZ-20070910

4. Project Document Evaluation objectives Typical LFA Field Project • Validity of design • Assessment of Performance Strategic Impact • Governance & Legislation • Public/Private Partnerships • Institutionalisation at Workplace • Access to international funding ILO/GTZ-20070910

5. Process ILO/GTZ-20070910

6. Rest of the World Central/Eastern Europe Moldova Global Ukraine Advocacy & Research Country Programme Support Process Response to strategy ILO/GTZ-20070910

7. Impact and achievements Training • 2003: 100 tripartite leaders • 2004: 250 tripartite leaders • 2005: 7 sub-regional and national events – 400 tripartite leaders • 2006: 12 sub-regional and national events – 300 tripartite leaders • 2006: 7 national events – 90 tripartite leaders Advocacy • 2003: 3 international events – 300 high-level officials • 2004: 7 international events – 300 high-level stakeholders • 2005: 3 international events – 400 high-level stakeholders • 2006: 5 international events – 300 high-level stakeholders • 2007: 1 international event – 300 high-level stakeholders Research and Knowledge-sharing • Contribution to translations, print and reprint of ILO Code into 11 languages and Application Manual into 4 new languages. • 5 publications on impact of HIV/AIDS in the Workplace • Major impact of publications: China, Russia, Indonesia, Brazil, Mozambique, Tanzania and Swaziland. [Ukraine & Moldova] ILO/GTZ-20070910

8. Strategic conclusions • Not all countries respond equally to strategy advocacy • Advocacy requires substantial risk funding • LFA approach does not necessarily work for advocacy projects • LFA approach offers advantages that are underused in research and country projects ILO/GTZ-20070910

9. Conclusions on Project Implementation • The Project is well-established within ILO • Models were developed according to Project Strategy • Awareness was increased amongst decision-makers • HIV/AIDS can occupy a significant position at WP • Genuine tripartite collaboration can be achieved in the WP • Project Staff were well selected and are motivated • Future sustainability remains a challenge • Current size of staff is insufficient • Strategy development and support to country projects require different approaches ILO/GTZ-20070910

10. Recommendations to achieve impact • Maintain and achieve labour legislation reform • Ensure continuous training of trainers • Sustain and expand leaders’ awareness • Correct wrong assumptions about the role of ILO • Increase KS through increased use of new technology and media • Create sustainable structures outside the ILO • Organise high-level conferences at country level to develop structures & systems & involve stakeholders • Identify and promote replicable best practice • Systematise project management within ILO-HIV/AIDS ILO/GTZ-20070910

11. Best practice to capture • Interpipe Corporation – Ukraine • Education Sector – Ukraine • Children and HIV/AIDS in Ukraine (Olena Franchuk Foundation) • Union Fenosa Group – Moldova (a tripartite success) • Moldova’s International centre for promoting women in business • ILO/GTZ Impact on Labour Legislation (a comparative experience Moldova & Uraine) • Conditions for HIV/AIDS WP strategy development ILO/GTZ-20070910