1 / 44

Stem cell transplantation: indications, preparation, follow up, results

Stem cell transplantation: indications, preparation, follow up, results. Dr Kriván Gergely Szent László Kórház. E. Donnall Thomas (1920-2012). Transplant activity worldwide 1980-2009. 35,000. Autologous Allogeneic. 30,000. 25,000. 20,000. Transplants. 15,000. 10,000. 5,000. 0.

nell
Télécharger la présentation

Stem cell transplantation: indications, preparation, follow up, results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stem cell transplantation: indications, preparation, follow up, results Dr Kriván Gergely Szent László Kórház

  2. E. Donnall Thomas (1920-2012)

  3. Transplant activity worldwide 1980-2009 35,000 Autologous Allogeneic 30,000 25,000 20,000 Transplants 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 '84 '80 '81 '82 '83 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09

  4. Rationale for stem cell transplant donor allogeneic Patient cured drug engraftment irradiation freezing autologous

  5. No. of transplants 01.01.1992.-06.03.2014. (n=481)

  6. Distribution of transplants according todisease categories01.01.1992.- 06.03.2014. N=481

  7. Sex ratioMedian age at time of transplant: 8,4 years

  8. About autologous transplantations

  9. Results- NBL n=54

  10. NBL - OS according to disease status Follow up (years)

  11. About allogeneic transplantations

  12. HLA antigens on cell surface - codominant expression

  13. Donor type • HLA identical family donor • HLA identical unrelated donor • HLA non identical (eg. haploidentical family member) • HLA non identical unrelated donor

  14. Submissions for HSCT in Hungary in children

  15. Unrelated donors for hungarian patients, according to the donor nationality (1990-2009) N: 242

  16. Allogeneic transplants according to donor origin n = 171 n =84

  17. Survival of allogeneic transplants according to sibling or unrelated donors01. 01. 1992. – 30.11.2011. n=198unrelated n=92, sibling n=106 n= p= n= n=96 p= n=96 Sibling 61,3% Overall:56,6% Testvér 61,3% n=66 MUD 51,1% Idegen % p=0,082 p=0,082 n=66 p=0,21

  18. Survival according to donor type 01. 01. 1992. -31. 12. 2002. 01. 01. 2003. - 30. 11. 2011. P=0,003 p=0,002

  19. Stem cell source • Bone marrow • Peripheral blood • Cord blood

  20. Peripheral stem cell Txp advantages and disadvantages Advanteges: • Rapid engraftment  shorter aplasia • Less toxicity • Earlier discharge from hospital • Less costs • More cells could be harvested with repeated apheresis  graft manipulation (CD34+ selection, T cell removal) • More convenient for donors; ambulatory harvesting; only possibility in case of high donor/recipient bw ratio Disadvantages: • Higher chronic graft versus host ratio

  21. Advantages and disadvantages of CBUs Advantages: • Easy and safe collection; quick delivery • Contains more premature progenitor cells, superior proliferative capacity • Less alloreactive lymphocytes (↓ aGvH and cGvH)) • Less probability to transfer infections (eg. CMV) • Less toxicity • No need for full HLA match (results with 1 antigen difference and full HLA matching are identical), greater probability for suitable donor Disadvantages : • Limited stem cell content • Delayed engraftment and immunreconstitution, more infections • DLI (donor lymphocyta infusion) not available • Possible transmission of genetic diseases

  22. Distribution of Txp. according to stem cell source n=400

  23. Changes in graft sources n=289 n=111

  24. Survival of cord blood transplants(02. 10. 2001. -30. 11. 2011.) n=26 OS:69,2% n=14 Diagnosis: X-adrenoleukodystrophy 2/26, ALL 3/26; AML 3/26; CML 2/26; Lesch-Nyhan sy. 1/26 MDS 2/26 NHL 1/26; SAA 1/26 , SCID 3/26 Wiscott-Aldrich sy. 1/26 WHIM sy. 1/26. Blackfan-Diamond sy. 1/26, Thalassaemia-beta 1/26, Congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia 1/26, Hurler-syndrome 1/26, Juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia 1/26, Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis 1/26,

  25. Stages of transplantation • Conditioning • Immediate posttransplant period aplasia (0-30. days) • Early posttransplant period (30-100. days) • Late posttransplant period (100-365. days)

  26. Conditioning regimen • Mega chemo-radiotherapy • Goal: • Eradication of malignant clones • Immunosuppression (rejection ) • „Space” for the donor hematopoesis in the bone marrow stroma

  27. 1. phase: before engraftment 2. phase: after engraftment 3. phase: late chronic Graft versus host disease: acute Neutropenia, Barrier damage (mucositis, central catheter) Decreased humoral and cellular immunity; NK cells appear first, but restricted T cell repertoire Decreased humoral and cellular immunity; B- and CD4 T cell count increases with a widening repertoire Bacteria Gram negative bacteria Rare Gram positive bacteria Encapsulated bacteria Gastrointestinal streptococci Viruses Herpes simplex CMV Varicella zoster Respiratory and enteral viruses Common Other viruses: pl. HHV EBV PTLD Fungi Aspergillus species Aspergillus species Candida species Pneumocystis Day 0. Day 15 - 45. Day 100. Beyond day 365.

  28. Infection-control Protective environment Isolation technics: Single room sterile box HEPA-filter High pressure air flow: 0,5 bar laminar air flow Surveillance

  29. Immunologic recovery after Txp Transplantation 140 120 Normal range 100 80 60 Neutrophils, monocytes, NK 40 B and CD8 T cells CD4 T cells 20 Plasma- and dendritic cells Time elapsed since Txp 0 Weeks Months Years

  30. Immunological reconstitution • NK (CD16+, CD 56+) cells: < 1 month • At beginning: ↑CD8+, ↓CD4/CD8 • B cell mitogen responsiveness: 2-3 months • Antigen specific B cell responsiveness : > 3 months • Normal IgM production: 4-6 months • Normal IgG production: 9 months • T cell depleted graft: > 12 months • Normal B cell (CD19+) count: 12 months • IgA, IgG2 and IgG4: > 1 y → sinopulmonary infections, encapsulated bacteria • Principal marker: CD4+ (helper) T cell count

  31. Prerequisites of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) • Graft must contain immunocompetent cells • Donor – host alloantigens are different • Host cells are severely immunodeficient

  32. Acute graft versus host disease Underlying disease Conditioning Concomittant infection Epithel- and endothel damage Citokin release (TNF, IL-1, IFN, GM-CSF, IL-6) MHC II, Adhesion molecule expression: Donor T cell activation Target cell apoptosis

  33. Acute GvHd and survival (SAA) N=27 pts. No aGvHD: 93% Acute GvHD: 37% p=0,015

  34. Acute liver GvH

  35. Chronic GvHD • In early phase: changes resemble to lichen planus  poikiloderma • Localized form: epidermal atrophy, focal fibrosis, morphea-like changes, without significant inflammation • Generalized form: inflammed changes  extended fibrosis, scleroderma

  36. Changes in survival within decades I. decade: 01.01.1992.- 31.12.2002. (n=104) OS:45,2% II. decade: 01.01.2003.-28.02.2012. (n=253) OS:66,8% OS: 66,8% 65,5% p=0,025 46,7% OS: 45,2%

  37. Survival according to disease groups01.01.1992.- 28.02.2012. n=354

More Related