1 / 12

THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS

THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS. Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21). THREE possible forms a relationship can take None of the variables influences the other (Symmetrical Relationship) Both variables influence each other (Reciprocal Relationship)

neola
Télécharger la présentation

THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE MEANING OF RELATIONSHIPS Chapter 1, Morris Rosenberg, “The Logic of Survey Analysis.” (Pp.3-21)

  2. THREE possible forms a relationship can take • None of the variables influences the other (Symmetrical Relationship) • Both variables influence each other (Reciprocal Relationship) • Only one of the variables influences the other (Asymmetrical Relationship) Sample Slides

  3. I. Symmetrical Relationships • - This means that neither variable “causes” the other, neither variable can be considered “prior” in time to the other. • Five types of symmetrical relationships • Alternative indicators of the same concept (e.g. signs of anxiety, palmer perspiration and heart pounding).- Factor analysis. • Effects of a common cause (e.g. Storks and babies, or restitutive punishment and individualism)- often referred to as ‘spurious’ relationships. Sample Slides

  4. 3. Functional interdependence as elements of a unit (e.g. the presence of lungs correlates with the presence of the heart, it is not that one “causes” the other but both are indispensible in the functioning of the unit, the organism)- structural analysis • Parts of a “complex” (e.g. rich people are often members of country clubs, drive particular brands of cars, stay at particular types of hotels when on trips, attend the opera etc- there is no functional interdependence between these different parts but the lifestyle “complex” ensures that these are often found together).- descriptive analysis • Accidental or Fortuitous: (e.g. the association between the emergence of the space age and rock and roll music). • **Elaboration is generally not a useful second step after the discovery of the symmetrical nature of relationships. Sample Slides

  5. II. Reciprocal Relationships (both influence each other) • Main Problem: Which variable is the cause and which is the effect. • Alternating Asymmetry: one acts on the other, the other acts on the first- mutually reinforcing the relationship, servo-mechanism, feedback , e.g. thermostat and temperature; Republican message and Republican convictions. • The ‘chicken and egg’ are both responsible for each other, which came first, the “primal cause” is not commented upon in reciprocal relationships. • Causation analysis, elaboration of relationships relates to Asymmetrical Relationships Sample Slides

  6. III. Asymmetrical Relationships -age and movies: inverse relationship - an external influence produces a change in something -Scientists are interested in i) causation ii) understanding iii) prediction, iv) control - The variable that is not subject to change has causal priority- it comes before the other variable in the relationship. -Fixed variables, also known as “status variables”: sex, race, birth order, national origin. - Relatively but not absolutely fixed variables, social class, religion, rural/urban residence SCIENCE IMPLIES EXPLANATION THROUGH ‘INVARIABLE LAWS’ -Dominant direction of influence of variables, e.g. mental health and religion. Sample Slide

  7. TYPES OF ASYMMETRICAL RELATIONSHIPS • Stimulus-Response: e.g. war and civilian morale, those exposed to the stimulus and those not exposed must be similar on all other factors. This makes the ‘selection’ of the sample of great importance in inferring stimulus-response relationship. • Disposition-Response: liberal- liberal action, the tendency, given circumstances, to respond in specific ways (e.g. attitudinal research, attitude is taken as independent variable and action as dependent variable, e.g. prejudice and discrimination). Beware of redundancy, where a larger concept embraces a smaller one Sample Slides

  8. TYPES OF ASYMMETRICAL RELATIONSHIPS • 3. Property-Disposition: e.g. sugar’s properties, shape, size, weight etc and solubility. Central type of relationship in social research, the property of an individual and a disposition to act: race and alienation, region of country and voting, class and voting etc. Since properties are resistant to change they are often taken as independent variables. • 4. Necessary precondition for a given effect: technological advancement and nuclear weaponry, technological advancement does not cause nuclear weapons but “makes it possible.” Free labor necessary precondition for development for capitalism. Sample Slides

  9. TYPES OF ASYMMETRICAL RELATIONSHIPS • 5. Immanent relationship: property inherent in nature of setup to produce a relationship between two variables, e.g. Bureaucracy and red tape, the dependent variable arises out of the independent variable, bureaucracy leads to adherence to rules, which leads to red tape. • 6. Means-ends (purposive relationships), e.g. standardization of procedure and lower costs, nest building and survival of the young. • Do the ends determine the means or do the means determine the ends, in whose mind does the purpose reside, if it resides in the mind of the actor then the end determined the means, if the end resides in the mind of the investigator then the means (cause) determines the end (effect) Sample Slides

  10. TASKS AT HAND • Assign meaning to the relationship, what kind is it? Asymmetrical, reciprocal or symmetrical • If asymmetrical, which is the independent and which is the dependent variable. • If symmetrical, what type is it, indicators of common concept, common cause (spurious), functional relationship and elements in a social complex • If reciprocal, it tells us about the “dynamic nature” of social relationships, e.g. the cycle of poverty. • If asymmetrical, we need to determine, whether it is stimulus- response; disposition-behavior; property-disposition (or behavior); necessary precondition- consequence, variables immanent in structures and means-ends analysis. Sample Slides

  11. Exam question • Which is the most common type of sociological analysis of asymmetrical relationships? • -means-ends • -property-disposition • -disposition-behavior • -structure-variables • -necessary precondition • -stimulus-response Sample Slides

  12. Answer • Which is the most common type of sociological analysis of asymmetrical relationships? • -means-ends • -property-disposition • -disposition-behavior • -structure-variables • -necessary precondition • -stimulus-response • Property as independent variable and disposition or behavior as dependent variable. Sample Slides

More Related