1 / 33

You Cannot ReSIST

You Cannot ReSIST. Hugh Glaser Electronics & Computer Science University of Southampton DSSE, 28th February 2007. With. Ian Millard Afraz Jaffri Benedicto Rodriguez ReSIST Partners esp. Brian Randell. ReSIST. EU Network of Excellence (www.resist-noe.org) Resilient Systems

neola
Télécharger la présentation

You Cannot ReSIST

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. You Cannot ReSIST Hugh Glaser Electronics & Computer Science University of Southampton DSSE, 28th February 2007

  2. With • Ian Millard • Afraz Jaffri • Benedicto Rodriguez • ReSIST Partners • esp. Brian Randell

  3. ReSIST • EU Network of Excellence • (www.resist-noe.org) • Resilient Systems • 15 partners across Europe • Resilience Knowledge Base • Resilience-Explicit Computing • Dissemination

  4. Semantic Web ChallengeWinner 2003 • CS AKTive Space • Gather data • UK People, projects, publications • Research funding • Top Universities • Geographical presentation • AKT Project (www.aktors.org)

  5. The Challenges • Organisational Intelligence • Who is doing what where? • What impact are they having? • Integrating resources – • Research Councils, HEFCE, HESA, RAE, EU, Institutional DBs and web sites, ePrints, citation services… • Information is heterogeneous and distributed • Not under own control • Not in a common format… • Presenting to users

  6. http://triplestore.aktors.org/demo/AKTiveSpace/

  7. Conceptual Architecture AKT Reference 3store datasources gatherers and mediators ontology knowledge repository(triplestore) applications

  8. So what is RDF...? • Resource Description Framework • W3C recommendation, comes predominantly from Semantic Web research efforts • A modelling language designed to represent facts about resources in the World Wide Web • Can be used to model any abstract domain, things do not have to be accessible on the web to be described in it

  9. RDF: Basic components • RDF graphs are formed by triples subject predicate object

  10. Open - SPARQL PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> PREFIX akt: <http://www.aktors.org/ontology/portal#> PREFIX akts: <http://www.aktors.org/ontology/support#> PREFIX wiki: <http://resist.ecs.soton.ac.uk/wiki/> PREFIX course: http://www.resist-noe.org/ontology/courseware# SELECT * WHERE { ?paper akt:has-title ?title . ?paper akt:has-author ?person . ?paper <http://www.aktors.org/ontology/extension#has-abstract> ?abstract } LIMIT 10

  11. At the Centre

  12. Important Components3store and CRS • Open source semantic store • Scalable • ReSIST - 50 million facts • Garlik - 1,000,000,000s • Uses lack of predefined schema • Cluster • Distributed queries next • Across external stores

  13. Triplestore Evaluation

  14. Consistent Reference Service (CRS) • Where is the Semantic Web here? • Technologies used • Who is “Jongho Nang”? • Which paper is “MPEG 비디오스트림에대한 MC-DCT 영역에서의자막처리방법”?

  15. Problems • Finding co-referents • NLP, Statistical, Structural • Making the knowledge available • Exposing a DB? • (Semantic) Web services • Home page (FOAF file)? • Identify co-referents • Against different policies - fit for purpose • Are false positives acceptable? • Distributed and federated (compare OAI-PMH) • Not a Naming Authority

  16. Query by URI: • http://dblp.uni-trier.de/People#35ff57fb • Response from CRS: <ns1:Bundle rdf:about= "http://www.aktors.org/ontology/coref#bundle-a458455fb66f997bf4a67488dbbdbdae"> <ns1:duplicate rdf:resource="http://citeseer.ecs.soton.ac.uk/#P147667"/> <ns1:duplicate rdf:resource="http://dblp.uni-trier.de/People#35ff57fb"/> <ns1:insertedOn>20061126</ns1:insertedOn> <ns1:hasCanon rdf:resource="http://citeseer.ecs.soton.ac.uk/#P147667"/> </ns1:Bundle> • Need to compute fixed point across CRSes • But “canon” can be used • Maintained according to need • Automatic • By Hand

  17. Real Semantic Web • The RKB Explorer • Accessing live RDF • Current ECS? • Query over multiple SPARQL endpoints • Triplestore per major resource • External triplestores • Universities • Funding agencies (CORDIS, NSF, etc) • CRS • Different sources because of different curation • Different types: convenience, good engineering • Different policies: application needs, trust • At last the Ontology is of some use.

  18. Future for ReSIST • Extend the use of Semantics • Resilient-Explicit Computing • Model expert knowledge • Model processes • Model components • Support Engineer/Scientist • Move effectively between • System design • Knowledge Base • People • To choose cost, characteristics, etc • Support Run-Time Deployment • Dynamic Reconfiguration

  19. Virtual Learning Environment Reprints Peer-Reviewed Journal & Conference Papers Technical Reports LocalWeb Preprints & Metadata Institutional Archive Publisher Holdings Certified Experimental Results & Analyses Data, Metadata & Ontologies In the Wild Undergraduate Students Digital Library Graduate Students E-Scientists E-Scientists E-Scientists Grid Entire E-Science CycleEncompassing experimentation, analysis, publication, research, learning E-Experimentation

More Related