1 / 10

Successful IT Implementations

Successful IT Implementations. 34% of projects completed on time , on budget , and with all specified features and functions. Expectations on Project. Time Spent & Time Saved Cost and Revenue Increase Functionality (existing & future needs) Intangibles

nero
Télécharger la présentation

Successful IT Implementations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Successful IT Implementations 34% of projects completed on time, on budget, and with all specifiedfeatures and functions

  2. Expectations on Project • Time Spent & Time Saved • Cost and Revenue Increase • Functionality (existing & future needs) • Intangibles • Learning (Staff & Management Skills) • Infrastructure (Standards, tools & shared info) • Adaptability (Problem Solving & Resources) • Org. Changes (Image, structures & comm.)

  3. eBPLS Implementations • 31 sites: Success Rate? Value Achieved? • How could it be improved? • What about other 69 municipalities?

  4. eRPTS • Guidelines for implementation (PAU) • Building upon eBPLS • Data loading challenge • Quality of system? • CESO involvement? • Project Management

  5. Recommendations • Assign Project Sponsor (Sr. LGU Mgr) • Assign Project Manager & Team with roles • Monitor Progress (simple but written) • Provide Ongoing Support (Internal & External) • Promote Alignment with LGU Goals/Needs • Evaluate Mid-term & Final for learning • Recognize Team [informal & formal] Is an approved Terms of Reference (SOW) useful?

  6. Summary “Success of a project will depend critically upon the effort, care and skill you apply in its initial planning.” What about • Project Manager knowledge & skills? • Project Sponsor scrutiny & support? • Quality/Value of system being implemented? • Culture, Expectations, & Attitude of staff?

  7. Terms of Reference (TOR)aka Statement of Work (SOW) • Scope, Goals & Objectives of Project • Schedule & Key Milestones • Cost (Money & Staff Time) • Project Organization & Staff Assigned • Monitoring & Evaluation • Issues & Mitigation Approach • Change Procedures (are these needed?)

  8. Progress Reportfor MMM-dd to MMM-dd (2 weeks?) • Accomplishments in this period • Plans for next period • Key Issues & Approach to resolve (max 3) (prepared by Project Manager for Sponsor referring to Project Plan)

  9. Project Risks • Misunderstanding on Scope & Objectives • No Committed Project Sponsor • Project Manager Lacks Skills • New Technology Lacking Support • Excessive Reliance on Tools • Data Quality not Addressed • Too Big a Step Forced on Users • Security Issues Ignored • No Monitoring nor Follow-up for Learning

  10. Some Success Factors • Top management involvement • Linking to previous successes • Perceived low risk of implementation • Low cost of implementation • Focuses on a critical factor necessary for the organization's success • Lots of involvement of staff, cross-departmental • Hoopla, catchy name, fun, visibility, etc.

More Related