390 likes | 505 Vues
This exploration delves into the distribution of populations within urban areas, highlighting how social status influences habitation patterns. Three key models—the Concentric Zone Model, Sector Model, and Multiple Nuclei Model—provide frameworks for analyzing urban structure and the reasons behind where people choose to live in cities. By applying these models and utilizing census data, we can gain insights into demographic characteristics, including income, ethnicity, and housing status, revealing broader trends in urban development and settlement patterns both in North America and globally.
E N D
Ch. 13 Key Issue 2 Where Are People Distributed Within Urban Areas?
Models of Urban Structure • Not distributed randomly; cluster depending on social status • generalizations • Each model can be applied to determine why people live where they do in a city • Concentric zone • Sector • Multiple nuclei
Concentric Zone Model • E.W. Burgess • City grows in “rings” • CBD- non residential • Transition- industry/poorer housing • Working class homes- older homes • Better residences- newer homes, middle class • Commuters zone- suburbs for CBD workers
CZM • Invasion and Succession • New immigrants move to the oldest housing near the center of the city and pushed earlier groups outward (towards suburbs) • Cycle would repeat itself: poor immigrants to the center, wealthy can then move outwards
Sector Model • Homer Hoyt • City develops and expands out in sectors (wedges) • Certain areas are more attractive for activities • Industry along transportation lines
Multiple Nuclei Model • Harris and Ullman • City revolves around more than one center (node) • Activities either attract to or avoid certain nodes • University will attract different services than airport • Incompatible activities avoid clustering • High-class housing and industry
Applying the Models • Social area analysis • Using census data to map out what neighborhoods various types of people live • Combine the models to get the most accurate representation of why people live in certain areas of a city • People prefer to live near others with similar characteristics
Applying the Models • Concentric Zone (2 Families) • Same ethnicity and income • Home owner likely in outer ring • Renter likely in an inner ring
Darker rings outside represent the suburbs (homeowners) in the commuter’s zone
Applying the Models • Sector Model (2 families) • Both own homes • Higher income family will live in different sector than lower income family
Dark wedge extending from CBD represents high-income house holds
Applying the Models • Multiple Nuclei • Same racial or ethnic background likely to live near each other • Growth of automobile and suburbs creates “Urban realms”- independent regions tied to a “suburban downtown” • Daily activities of many people occur within a limited section of the larger city • Cities are made up of small "realms" which are self-sufficient urban areas with independent focal points (nodes).
Minorities occupying nodes- possibly in zones 3, 4 or 5 of the model
Applying the Models • Each model represents certain characteristics of a city better: • Homeowner vs renter (CZ) • Incomes (Sector) • Ethnicity (MN) • Combining them puts the entire picture together • We can now identify in which part of Dallas a 1) high income, 2) Asian-American 3) homeowner most likely lives
What about a: 1) home-owning 2) low-income 3) African American family?
Applying the Models Outside North America • America urban areas differ from others in the world • European cities • LDCs • Social groups (income, ethnicity) may not have same reasons for selecting a neighborhood within their cities • Such as: Likely to live with those of similar characteristics
Models in European Cities • Wealthy still live in inner rings, not jut suburbs • Sector model: wealthy extend out in a wedge from CBD • Live closer to palace (historically); or in restored older buildings (now) • Low income residents more likely on the outskirts of city • Historical vertical segregation in cities: wealthy on bottom floors, poor in basement or attic • Poor moved closer to factories with Industrial Revolution, away from wealthy
European Cities • Effects of low income displacement • Face longer commutes to cities from suburbs on public transportation • Inhabitants are displaced residents from the cities (persons of color, new immigrant from Africa and Asia) • Europe encourages high rise apartments in suburbs • Prevent suburban sprawl seen in US • Attract tourists to historic inner city
Models in LDCs • Poor in suburbs, wealth in inner city and extending wedge • Remnant of European colonial policies • Precolonial cities • Colonial cities • Postcolonial independence
Precolonial Cities • Mostly rural residents before colonization • Built around a religious core with some sort of marketplace (bazaar) • Wealthy and government surrounding bazaar; poor/immigrants on outskirts
Colonial Cities • Colonizers expanded existing cities to accommodate colonial activities (military, residences for Europeans) • Old towns may have been left to one side of city or demolished • Built following standardized plans • Spanish: Law of the Indies (1573) • Examples: • Mexico City (modified the old Aztec City) • Fes, Morocco (two distinct towns- before and after French colonization) • Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City), Vietnam (built on top of a totally destroyed Precolonial city)
Cities Since Independence • Migrating towards cities to find work • Squatter settlements • LDCs cannot handle population growth and high migration • Few services/bad infrastucture(schools, roads, sewers) • Griffin and Ford- Latin American City Model • Wealthy inhabit a sector (spine), service attractive to wealthy will cluster here • Transportation lines • Physical factors: high elevation, views, beaches