1 / 25

Advanced Parallel Compensator Design for Challenging Continuous and Relay Control Systems

This presentation explores the development and application of Parallel Compensators in continuous and relay control systems, particularly focusing on difficult plants. Key topics include: 1) Introduction to Parallel Compensators; 2) Approximate Description of Closed Loop Systems; 3) Selection of Replacement Plants for Stability; 4) Control Saturation Considerations; 5) Implementation of Relay Control; 6) Conclusion on Design Effectiveness. The insights are grounded in foundational theories and real-world examples, showcasing the advantages of this approach in ensuring robust system performance.

neveah
Télécharger la présentation

Advanced Parallel Compensator Design for Challenging Continuous and Relay Control Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Parallel Compensator for Continuous and Relay Control Systems with Difficult Plants Ryszard Gessing Silesian University of Technology Gliwice, Poland

  2. Outlineof Presentation: • Introduction • Parallel Compensator • Approximate Description of the CL System • Choice of the Replacement Plant • Accounting of the Control Saturation • Relay Implementation • Final Conlusions

  3. Introduction • Smith predictor (compensator), 1958 • Deng, Iwai and Mizumoto 1999 for minimum phase plants • Gessing ACC 2004 for nonminimum phase plants

  4. Outline of Presentation: • Introduction • Parallel Compensator • Approximate Description of the CL System • Choice of the Replacement Plant • Accounting of the Control Saturation • Relay Implementation • Final Conlusions

  5. Plant: is stable Parallel Compensator: Replacement Plant:

  6. = const It should be: In steady state:

  7. Outline of Presentation: • Introduction • Parallel Compensator • Approximate Description of the CL System • Choice of the Replacement Plant • Accounting of the Control Saturation • Relay Implementation • Final Conlusions

  8. Regulator: (for a large k) Closed loop System:

  9. Outline of Presentation: • Introduction • Parallel Compensator • Approximate Description of the CL System • Choice of the Replacement Plant • Accounting of the Control Saturation • Relay Implementation • Final Conlusions

  10. Replacement plant: is chosen so that: n – degree ofM(s), T is chosen so that then the CL system is stable for very large k

  11. CL system description: Characteristic equation: or which has (n-1)-multiple root:

  12. Example 1 Plant: For the replacement plant is: and parallel compensator: Assume k=1000 which gives

  13. For r=1(t-1) we obtain: Settling time for t ~1, u ~1000 for t ~1.15, u ~-140 Acceptable responses for

  14. Outline of Presentation: • Introduction • Parallel Compensator • Approximate Description of the CL System • Choice of the Replacement Plant • Accounting of the Control Saturation • Relay Implementation • Final Conlusions

  15. Example 2 Data as in Example 1 For insignificant increase of settling time For settling time ~ 5

  16. Comparison with regulator PID Settling time ~ 12.2 about 4-times longer.

  17. Outline of Presentation: • Introduction • Parallel Compensator • Approximate Description of the CL System • Choice of the Replacement Plant • Accounting of the Control Saturation • Relay Implementation • Final Conlusions

  18. During fast switchings we have:

  19. Equivalent systems Relay system Continuous system switched amplitude then both the systems are equivalent, i.e. for the same reference values r(t) we obtain the same outputsy(t) in both the systems.

  20. Example 3 The plant and parallel comensator the same as in previous examples. Relay system: h=0.01, H=10 solid line Continuous system: k=1000, dotted line For h=0.005 both the outputs are nondistinguishable.

  21. Relay system h=0.005, H=20 Continuous system The outputs y for both the systems are nondinguishable.

  22. Comparison Sliding mode control Parallel compensator Ass; minimum phase plant without this assuption Characteristic equation:

  23. Outline of Presentation: • Introduction • Parallel Compensator • Approximate Description of the CL System • Choice of the Replacement Plant • Accounting of the Control Saturation • Relay Implementation • Final Conlusions

  24. Easy for desinging • Some freedom in choosing the replacement plant and shaping dynamics • Shortening of transients • It has some robustness with respect to change of the plant parameters. • Implementation of sliding mode control without necessity of applying of higher order derivatives • Equivalence of continuous and relay systems • Plant must be stable • Regulator has a high order

More Related