40 likes | 154 Vues
This document outlines significant editorial and content changes to the benchmarking terminology related to resource reservation capable routers. The title has been updated for clarity, alongside numerous rephrased sections and added clarifications. Key adjustments include defining router load factors as observable and controllable levers, introducing a composite unit for traffic load factors, and redefining signaling message loss as signaling message deficit. Additionally, a new section discusses router load conditions and scalability limits, aiming for clearer and more intuitive definitions.
E N D
Gábor Fehér (feher.gabor@tmit.bme.hu) Krisztián Németh(Krisztian.Nemeth@tmit.bme.hu) András Korn (korn.andras@tmit.bme.hu) István Cselényi(Istvan.Cselenyi@teliasonera.com) Benchmarking Terminology for Resource Reservation Capable Routers Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi
Editorial changes • Change of title: was “… routers supporting resource reservation”, became “… resource reservation capable routers” • Lots of re-phrasings throughout • Some clarifications added (e.g. about the issues with multiple idempotent signaling messages arriving in a burst) Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi
Important changes • Router load factors clarified (so it’s clear they are just the observable and controllable levers we can use to stress the router) • Traffic load factors now have a composite unit of [pps; bytes] to better reflect that packets-per-second is just as important as raw Mbps • Signaling message loss redefined as signaling message deficit Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi
Important changes #2 • New section: 3.5 Router Load Conditions and Scalability Limit • Defines “Loss-Free Load Condition”, “Lossy Condition” • Raises issue of “in reasonable time” • Much clearer, more verbose and hopefully more intuitive definition of “Scalability Limit” Fehér – Németh – Korn - Cselényi