1 / 33

Front

Front. X-ray Studies of Galaxies and Galaxy Systems Jesper Rasmussen Ph.D. Defence Astronomical Observatory, Univ. of Copenhagen 17th March 2004. Outline. Background: X-rays from galaxy systems XMM-Newton observations of two galaxy groups X-ray haloes of simulated disk galaxies

nhi
Télécharger la présentation

Front

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Front X-ray Studies of Galaxies and Galaxy Systems Jesper Rasmussen Ph.D. Defence Astronomical Observatory, Univ. of Copenhagen 17th March 2004

  2. Outline • Background: X-rays from galaxy systems • XMM-Newton observations of two galaxy groups • X-ray haloes of simulated disk galaxies • Chandra observations of a dwarf starburst galaxy • Summary

  3. Collaborators, papers Main collaborators: Kristian Pedersen, Sune Toft (AO, Copenhagen) Jesper Sommer-Larsen, Martin Götz (TAC, Copenhagen) Trevor Ponman (Univ. of Birmingham, UK) Papers (1) Groups: Rasmussen & Ponman (2004), MNRAS, in press (2+3) Disk galaxies: Rasmussen, Sommer-Larsen, Toft, Pedersen (2004), MNRAS, 349, 255 + Toft et al., 2002, MNRAS, 335, 799 (4) XMM simulations: Rasmussen, Pedersen, Götz (2004), astro-ph/0202022 (5) Dwarf starburst: Rasmussen, Stevens, Ponman (2004), in preparation

  4. X-rays from galaxy systems X-ray emission: Thermal emission from hot (~107 K) gas.  Formation of structure: Gas infall in dark matter halo, compression and (shock) heating of gas. Evolution of structure: Processes affecting hot gas properties (galaxy winds, nuclear outflows, cooling, …) Galaxies: Violent processes in the interstellar medium, interactions with environment… Cosmology: Detection of distant systems; gas (baryon) content  constraints on Ωm

  5. Outline • XMM-Newton observations of two galaxy groups • X-ray haloes of simulated disk galaxies • Chandra observations of a dwarf starburst galaxy

  6. X-rays from two galaxy groups • Goal: Study large-radius properties of groups for the first time. 1 • Two groups, atz = 0.18andz = 0.256, selected from ROSAT pointed observations. 2 • XMM-Newton 22 ks exposure (single pointing)  15 arcmin  Smoothed 0.4-2.5 keV image (all 3 XMM/EPIC cameras).

  7. Groups: X-ray + optical Dig. Sky Survey 1 2 WARPS, R-band WARPS, I-band

  8. Groups: Results Surface brightness fit using -model: 1 2 β= 0.49 rc = 75 kpc (h=0.75) Extent = 570 kpc β= 0.62 rc=170 kpc Extent = 650 kpc Fitting of thermal plasma models to spectra: T-1 kT = 1.7 +/- 0.1 keV Z = 0.3 +/-0.1 Zsun kT = 2.4 +/- 0.4 keV Z = 0.3 +/- 0.2 Zsun

  9. { 1. M = (5.1+/- 0.5) x 1013 Msun, rdet/r200 = 0.74 2. M = (1.0+/- 0.2) x 1014 MSun, rdet/r200 = 0.66  Groups: Implications Gas mass fraction Entropy, S = T/Ne2/3 2 ~0.14 & ~0.17 (h=0.75) 1

  10. Groups: Summary • X-rays detected to ~ 0.7 r200 in two X-ray bright groups. • Gas mass fraction rises with radius, global value similar to clusters •  • Groups could contain many more baryons than is often supposed (could help solve the ”missing baryon” problem) • Entropy distribution: • (1) confirms: groups are not ”downscaled clusters” • (2) rules out simple formation scenarios that assume pre-heating and smooth accretion of gas.

  11. Outline • XMM-Newton observations of two galaxy groups • X-ray haloes of simulated disk galaxies • Chandra observations of a dwarf starburst galaxy

  12. Disk galaxy halos (1) z = 0 (Toft et al. 2002) agreement with observations. (2) Here predict evolution with redshiftfor MW-like galaxies. Idea: Use cosmological simulations to compute X-ray properties of hot halos of disk galaxies. Cosmological simulations: Sommer-Larsen et al (2003). Include star formation, feedback, radiative cooling, UV radiation.

  13. LX <1/T> Simulations Disk galaxy halos: Lxvs z Accretion rate of cold (T< 3 x 104 K) gas onto disk :

  14. Chandra Deep Field North: 1 Ms(covers Hubble Deep Field-N) Disk galaxy halos: High-z constraints Hornschemeier et al. 2002: ________ CDF-N spectroscopic sample - - - - - CDF-N photometric sample

  15. > 10 halos per deg2(to z = 0.3 in 1 Ms) Halos: Detection prospects XEUS 10% of MW-like galaxies to z=0.3 Surface brightness vs vertical disk distance |z|

  16. Halos: Summary • Halo Lx increases 5-10 times from z = 0 to z = 1. Reflects the evolution of accretion rate of cold gas onto the galactic disk. • Evolution in agreement with deep X-ray data. • Detection of halos of Milky Way-like galaxies at cosmological distances must await the next generation of X-ray instrumentation.

  17. Outline • XMM-Newton observations of two galaxy groups • X-ray haloes of simulated disk galaxies • Chandra observations of a dwarf starburst galaxy

  18. NGC1800: An embedded starburst • Goal: Study interactions between galactic wind and ambient gas – is wind confined? • NGC1800: Dwarf starburst galaxy, D ~ 7 Mpc. • Galaxy group: 6 members, σ = 260 km/s. • Chandra/ACIS 45 ks exposure D25(25 mag/arcsec2) NGC1800, B-band, 6 x 6 arcmin

  19. NGC1800 observations - or ”how X-ray data can also appear” 0.3-2 keV raw image

  20. NGC1800 – diffuse X-rays X-ray/optical overlay 0.3-5 keV, adaptively smoothed D25 Dspec ~ 2kpc Results from thermal model fit: kT = 0.25 +0.05/-0.03 keV (1σ) Z = 0.05 +0.22/-0.04 Zsun (1σ) Extent ≈ 2 kpc Lx = 1.3 +/- 0.3 x 1038 erg/s

  21. NGC1800 group LX - σ relation (ROSAT)+ σ - T relation  Expectation:kT ~ 0.7 keV LX ~ 1.5 x 1042 erg/s ~ 1500 counts/CCD But ”no” detection (~100 counts/CCD)  LX < 1041 erg/s

  22. VLA HI map (Hunter et al. 1994) NH: 0.511 x 1020 cm-2 1'≈ 2 kpc Blow-out criterion: > 1 (Mac Low & McCray 1988 – blast wave dynamics in stratified atmosphere) NGC1800: Wind blow-out?

  23. Conical geometry: Sr-1.3 α  1.2. But M82 & NGC253: α  0.9 & 1.3 …so no clear evidence of wind confinement. NGC1800: Wind  IGM Galactic starburst wind confined by the IntraGroup Medium (IGM)? (PIGM< Pwind )  Freely expanding wind: ner-α, α = 2(Chevalier & Clegg 1985)

  24. X-rays from dwarf starbursts X-ray activity vs ”mass” X-ray activity vs star formation activity Gas temperature vs ”mass”

  25. NGC1800: Summary • NGC1800: Most distant dwarf starburst with detection of diffuse X-ray emission. • X-ray gas can probably leave the galaxy - but no clear evidence for wind-IGM interaction (and no detection of hot gas in the group). • X-ray emission from dwarf starbursts governed by starburst activity rather than mass of host galaxy.

  26. Groups • X-rays detected to ~ 0.7 r200. Gas mass fraction rises with radius, global value similar to clusters. Entropy distribution rules out certain formation scenarios. Disk galaxy halos • Halo Lx increases 5-10 times from z = 0 to z = 1. Evolution in agreement with deep X-ray data. Dwarf starburst • Most distant dwarf with diffuse X-rays. No clear evidence for wind-IGM interaction. X-rays from dwarf starbursts governed by starburst activity. XMM sim’s • Versatile tool for a variety of applications. Small clusters detectable to z > 1 in 10 ks. Summary: Results

  27. Circular velocity Vc: ”generalized” Schechter function:  > 10 halos per deg2(to z = 0.3 in 1 Ms) Halos: Detection prospects XEUS 10% of MW-like galaxies to z=0.3 + Surface brightness vs vertical disk distance |z|

  28. Summary: Comparison of sources Bolometric LX , Ωm = 1, ΩΛ = 0, h = 0.5

  29. Outline • XMM-Newton observations of two galaxy groups • X-ray haloes of simulated disk galaxies • Chandra observations of a dwarf starburst galaxy • Simulating XMM-Newton observations

  30. XMM simulations: Setup Motivation: Distant clusters in XMM ”blank-sky” pointings?(but many other possible applications) Source field setup: Clusters from Press-Schechter and N-body sim’s, point sources, backgrounds. Method: Input to SciSim (ray-tracing software), construct data sets from output.

  31. XMM simulations: Example (test) 20 ks exposure of T ~ 5 keV cluster at z = 0.6

  32. XMM simulations: Blank-sky Wavelet detections, > 6σ Input source field, 30 x 30 arcmin 0.5-2 keV output image (all EPIC)

More Related