1 / 21

Determination of dose-response functions in CEEH

Determination of dose-response functions in CEEH. Jakob H. Bønløkke, MD, PhD CEEH and Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inst. of Public Health, Aarhus University, DK jb@mil.au.dk. Aarhus University in Århus. Use of D-R-functions.

nida
Télécharger la présentation

Determination of dose-response functions in CEEH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Determination of dose-response functions in CEEH • Jakob H. Bønløkke, MD, PhD • CEEH and Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Inst. of Public Health, Aarhus University, DK • jb@mil.au.dk

  2. Aarhus University in Århus

  3. Use of D-R-functions • Dose/Exposure/Concentration - response relationships are crucial if health risks are to be trusted - and evaluated • Increased responses with increased doses, e.g. number of asthma attacks with increased ozone concentrations • or mortality rates ...

  4. Adjusted Mortality-Rate Ratios and Pollution Levels in the Six Cities Texte Texte Dockery et al NEJM 1993

  5. Cohort studies • Six Cities Study a prospective cohort study of 8000+ Americans with 15 years of follow-up using annual means of pollutants • Important basis of many D-R-functions used in models since together with studies by Pope and colleagues on 500000+ Americans

  6. Current estimates in CEEH • Primarily based on cohort studies • Example: • Relative risk for all-cause mortality: 1.05 for a 10 microg/m3 increase of PM2.5 . • “chronic death”

  7. Time series studies • Estimates of short-term effects • Correspondingly the D-R-function could be increase in mortality the day after an episode of high levels of a pollutant • “acute deaths” • By nature included in the long-term functions! (however poorly)

  8. Where are people exposed? • D-R-functions estimated outdoors at home • People spent most time indoors • and get extreme exposures during transport • and at work • By nature this too is reflected in the long-term function (however poorly because of “noise”) • - insufficient evidence to make good separate estimates for separate locations

  9. Other issues • Harvesting? • Thresholds? • Combined effects of several pollutants

  10. Does harvesting take place: Is an increase in mortality followed bya decrease shortly after?

  11. Schwartz Am J Epidemiol 2000

  12. Is there a threshold belowwhich no effect of particles onhealth has been observed?

  13. Daniels NMMAPS Am J Epidemiol 2000

  14. CEEH pollutants • No indications of thresholds for any pollutant • Ozone is poorly documented at low levels so currently it is being used as if there was a threshold at 70 microg/m3

  15. Are associations with particlessensitive to adjustment forco-pollutants?

  16. Samet NMMAPS NEJM 2001

  17. D-R-function between particulate matter and mortality is robust to correction for other pollutants • Not the case for all functions • And there are separate effects of different pollutants • Problem in estimating D-R-functions is that several pollutants are highly correlated

  18. Not only mortality ... • Respiratory symptoms • Medication • Absence from work • Cancer • Heart attacks, strokes, • Loss of IQ, etc.

  19. A matter of dose ... • Dose determines the response (?) • Dose a function of • concentration • time • uptake in body (usually via lungs) • clearing from body • uptake in target organ

  20. Thank you for your attention

  21. Suggested estimates in CEEH • RR for all-cause mortality: 1.05 for a 10 microg/m3 increase of PM2.5 . • RR among survivors of myocardial infarcts: 1.30 for a 10 microg/m3 increase of PM10. (Zanobetti and Schwartz EHP 2007)

More Related