1 / 63

Who should take action?

MESS and CLUTTER: SORTING IT OUT John Snowdon Old age psychiatrist jsnowdon@mail.usyd.edu.au. Who should take action?.

nigel-berry
Télécharger la présentation

Who should take action?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MESS and CLUTTER: SORTING IT OUT John Snowdon Old age psychiatristjsnowdon@mail.usyd.edu.au

  2. Who should take action? • Man aged 60 years, sent on schedule which stated: “Grossly disshevelled, unkempt. Living in profound squalor. Deterioration in hoarding behaviour in recent months. Poor hygiene. He stated that he only has one meal a day and has not changed his clothes for several years. He … slept outside to “protect his privacy”. Denied self-harm or harm to others (yelling at night as well)” • Community team notes: “Referred by neighbour who was concerned about X’s mental state. Has apparently been sleeping under an umbrella outside his house (on front porch). Collects rubbish and fills back yard with it. Has no running water or power. Stays out until 3 a.m., sleeps until midday. According to neighbour, X shouts to himself in the early mornings. Assessed outside front door as client refused to let us in Poor insight. Says he “chooses” to live like that. Does not see a problem”. • In hospital 13 days. CT brain scan normal. Blood tests OK.

  3. Psychological report • “Significant impairment on tasks of immediate memory for verbally presented information. On tests of executive functioning X fell within the impaired classification overall… Difficulty focussing his attention, in recalling novel information and with tasks requiring more abstract, higher level processing. He demonstrated poor judgement and impairment in self-direction and self-regulation. This pattern of results may be indicative of a frontal lobe condition.”

  4. Who should take action? • 9 years later, referral to community mental health team from the client’s nephew. The family hadn’t seen X for 30 years, but his uncle wanted to see him before he (uncle) dies. When they arrived at the property they found it to be “in squalor” and X was unkempt. • “The neighbours state they have made numerous complaints to council about the rats but nothing has been done. X is sleeping on the front verandah amongst the squalor and accumulated items”. • Hasn’t been in the house for 5 months. Dishevelled, unkempt. Aware he needs to clean up. Orientated. Has money in the bank. Showered. Given new clothes to take home …

  5. Meanings of words Collecting Accumulating (eventually amassment) Hoarding Pathological animal collecting (“hoarding”) Environmental neglect (? self-neglect) Severe domestic squalor

  6. Organised and systematic collecting Compulsive acquisition with little attempt to resist (items may be of value, collected systematically but to excess) Hoarding: acquisition of, and failure to discard possessions of limited use or value Accumulation of rubbish Neglect personal care and home cleanliness Neglect basic health needs (including medication) Neglect social needs Fail to eat/drink enough Poor care of finances Fail to protect self from financial or sexual abuse Aspects of collectionism, self-neglect and severe domestic squalor

  7. A 2007 review revealed 2 bodies of literature • Literature on squalor. By 2007 there had been 74 case-reports and 15 reports of case-series in health sciences journals. • Literature on hoarding. Various reports, some mentioning squalor, but no research on the prevalence of severe uncleanliness in cases of hoarding. Snowdon, Shah, Halliday (2007) InternatPsychogeriatrics, 19, 37-51.

  8. Literature review Macmillan and Shaw (1966). Psychiatric. Senile breakdown in standards of personal and environmental cleanliness Clark et al (1975). Geriatricians. Diogenes syndrome. 30 inpatients, 66-92 Halliday et al (2000). Special cleaning team. Squalor. 91 community residents. 70% had mental disorder. None with OCD.

  9. Severe domestic squalor • Squalor: what’s the word mean, and do we want to use it? • What is severe domestic squalor? • Should we be doing something when we encounter people who live in squalor? • Why do some people live in squalor?

  10. Severe domestic squalor • Cooney and Hamid (1995) referred to “a reclusive elderly person living alone in a dilapidated filthy house. The home is cluttered with rubbish and infested with vermin. Excrement and decomposing food are strewn around the floors and the stench emanating is unbearable to all but the occupant, who is blissfully unconcerned by the situation.”

  11. Severe domestic squalor • Some clinicians suggested there was a syndrome: • Environmental uncleanliness (and often associated personal uncleanliness) and, to a varying extent, • Lack of concern about their living conditions • Social withdrawal • Hostile attitudes • Stubborn refusal of help

  12. Severe domestic squalor • We suggest that ‘severe domestic squalor’ is a description of an environment, not of a person . Ratings should not be of the person who lives in that environment, so the person’s characteristics should be noted separately and respectfully . It’s not a syndrome and certainly isn’t a diagnosis!

  13. The term ‘severe domestic squalor’ is applied when a person’s home is so unclean, messy and unhygienic that people of similar culture and background would consider extensive clearing and cleaning to be essential. Accumulations of dirt, grime and waste material extend throughout living areas of the dwelling, along with presence or evidence of insects and other vermin. Rotting food, excrement &/or odours are likely to cause feelings of revulsion among visitors. • As well as accumulation of waste, there may have been purposeful collection and/or retention of items to such a degree that it interferes with occupants’ ability to adequately clean up the dwelling.

  14. Why do some people live in squalor? • Maybe they have a mental or physical disorder that makes them incapable of (e.g. weak or had CVA), or unmotivated (maybe newly so, due to frontal lobe damage) to keep their domestic environment clean. • Maybe their vision or sense of smell is impaired. • Maybe their personality is such that they don’t care about uncleanliness & don’t notice filth. (Quntin Crisp ?) • Maybe they’ve never been organised or learnt to clean. • Maybe they come from a culture that sees no need for clean surroundings. • Maybe there are impediments to cleaning – e.g. it’s out of reach or cleaning is obstructed by collected, hoarded or accumulated items. • They might have Hoarding Disorder: very attached to, and difficulty discarding, items – maybe even dirty ones.

  15. Diagnoses in 2 studies • Halliday et al (2000): n=81 age range 18-94 Organic mental disorder……22% Substance abuse……………….10% Schiz/delusional disorder….21% Affective disorder……………….5% Anxiety/phobic disorder ….…6% Developmental disabiliy…….11% No diagnosed mental disorder…………………………25% • Snowdon & Halliday (2011): n=120, age 65 years or more Dementia…………………..35% Subst abuse/ARBD …….24% Schiz/paranoid dis……. 15% Depression…………………..3% Personality disorder……. 9% (obsessional 4%) Physical illness……………..8% No DSM or physical disorder ….……5%

  16. Severe domestic squalor Descriptions of cases can be grouped according to ‘severity’ (e.g. rated on the ECCS), or into • those where accumulation of useless items and articles have obstructed proper care of a person’s living conditions. ‘Dry squalor’. • those where filth and refuse have accumulated because of failure to get rid of them. May be filthy without a lot of clutter. May be ‘wet squalor’. • Both (1) and (2)

  17. Pets • There were pet animals in 42 (25%) of these metropolitan homes: Many cats in one house, 11 birds in another 4 or 5 animals in 3 others 3 or fewer in 37 None in 131.

  18. Many “animal hoarders” live in extremely squalid conditions. • 78% “heavily littered with trash and garbage”, and in 45% there was “profuse urine and feces in the living room”. (Patronek and Nathanson, 2009)

  19. Collecting (as opposed to hoarding) is selective object accumulation.Pleasurable: Psychological benefit

  20. Our common understanding is that hoarding = storing for future use, or to look at, perhaps Squirrel away? Bower-bird mentality?In recent years, excessive item or material amassment has been widely referred to as hoarding, even when it’s not done purposely and the stuff lacks use or value.

  21. Do you hoard a lot? • During your lifetime, have you ever accumulated so many things that your home was very cluttered (to the extent that you could not use some rooms for their intended purpose) and you found it very difficult to discard or give away these items? Screening question in a 2008-10 London Community Health Study

  22. Why do some people hoard? Complex interplay of factors: • Genetic • Personality • Organisational, beliefs, culture, attitudes • Neurobiological disturbance (e.g. brain disorder) • Perceived value of items: practical, sentimental, intrinsic • Erroneous beliefs • Attachment issues etc. We need psychologists!

  23. Compulsive Hoarding • Some researchers suggested that OCD is the most common reason for people to excessively hoard possessions and then to live in unclean conditions (Saxena et al, 2002; Steketee & Frost, 2003). • However, recent evidence points to compulsive hoarding being a genetically and neurobiologically discrete entity (Saxena, 2007; Pertusa et al, 2008). • It’s been suggested that compulsive hoarding is really an impulse-control deficit rather than a compulsion (Maier, 2004), and anyway, some collect ritualistically rather than compulsively or on impulse. Others don’t collect; they just don’t throw away. Ritualistic collection and unmotivated accumulation of rubbish should not be referred to as hoarding.

  24. Hoarding has been defined in the psychological literature as the acquisition of, and failure to discard, possessions of limited use or value. The person • actively acquires stuff , • purposely keeps it, and (if it’s abnormal/pathological) • living spaces become too cluttered for activities for which they were designed. • The person’s distressed and there’s significantly impaired ability to function.

  25. DSM-5 Hoarding Disorder • Persistent difficulty discarding items, regardless of actual value • …due to perceived need to save the items, and distress associated with discarding them, • …resulting in accumulation of possessions that clutter living areas, thus substantially interfering with function and activities. • This causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other importantareas of functioning. • Not attributable to a medical condition (brain injury, stroke, etc) • Not better explained by the symptoms of another mental disorder: cognitive deficits (dementia), low energy (major depression), delusions (schizophrenia), restricted interests (autism), obsessions (OCD). Specify if (a) with excessive acquisition, (b) with good/poor/no insight

  26. Normative collecting versus Hoarding Disorder Normative collecting • Selective. Cohesive theme. Narrower range of categories • Planned, organised collecting • Not usually excessive. • Orderly display of collection • Distress rare (e.g. due to cost) • Minimal social impairment; collecting adds to social life • No significant work impairment Hoarding Disorder • Non-selective. Lots of different categories • Lack of planning or focus • Commonly excessive. Free/Bought • Disorganised clutter • Distress is very common • Severe social impairment; often single, social withdrawal • Occupational impairment common

  27. Prevalence of Hoarding Disorder • 1.6% of 1698 a South East London population aged between 16 and 90 years fulfilled criteria for Hoarding Disorder. • Studies (mainly in the US) say that 2% to 6% of adults hoard excessively. But this would include people whose hoarding would be attributable to mental disorders such as dementia, OCD and schizophrenia.

  28. Hoarding and squalor • People who collect or hoard may do so in an organised way. YES WE CAN !! • But if they accumulate too much stuff, or if they don’t keep it in an organised way, it may be difficult to keep the storage area (e.g. the whole dwelling) clean: • It gets messy!

  29. Some people who hoard excessively don’t keep their dwellings clean • If their hoarding is disorganised and very excessive, they may not be able to reach and clean all areas, even if motivated to do so. • Some people who hoard excessively do so because they have impaired neuropsychological function that may result in disorganisation, difficulty in discarding, lack of awareness that areas or items are unclean and/or a lack of motivation to clean.

  30. Maier (2004) helped us distinguish compulsive hoarding from non-hoarding accumulation • OCD or brain change: collecting too much and then having difficulty discarding. Hoarding. • Impulse-control deficit (e.g. due to brain changes) rather than compulsion. Hoarding. • Ritualistic, grasping behaviour. Collectionism. Not hoarding. • Unmotivated to throw away. Accumulate rubbish. Not hoarding. Maier T (2004) ActaPsychiat Scand 110, 323-337.

  31. In various neuropsychiatric disorders (dementia, autism and schizophrenia (OK?) acquisition isn’tcompulsive and isn’t due to poor impulse control. It’s “just motor activity without clear intention or aim, hence stereotypic, ritualistic.” People collecting in this way may be indifferent to removal of the items. Maier liked the term ‘collectionism ’ for this behaviour.

  32. Collecting, hoarding, accumulating, disorganisation, mess, squalor: the OVERLAP • You can collect, hoard &/or accumulate clean stuff in an organised fashion. • You might hoard too much, so that even if it’s fairly well organised, it’s too difficult to keep clean. • You can accumulate rubbishy stuff (‘cos you haven’t got round to discarding it yet). • Disorganised hoarding may result in accumulating messily and living in SQUALOR. • You may accumulate rubbish/waste/garbage / filth by being too laid-back or disabled to throw it out. It’s not purposeful hoarding. Can lead to SQUALOR.

  33. Not all those who self-neglectand not all those who hoardlive in severe domestic squalor • Some people neglect (seem not to care about) cleanliness of themselves, their dependants or their homes and don’t get rid of rubbish (e.g. some with dementia, schizophrenia, alcoholism). Some are physically or cognitively unable to take action. • Excessive or inappropriate collecting (and especially failure to discard) may lead to difficulty in cleaning.

  34. Clutter/accumulation in Central Sydney cases of moderate or severe domestic squalor • Of 115 cases of moderate/severe squalor, the degree of clutter/accumulation was deemed to be minimal or absent in 39 (34%) moderate in 37 (32%) major in 39 (34%) Filth but little object clutter may be wet squalor; item clutter & no faeces etc may = dry squalor!

  35. Accumulation/clutter in cases of moderate/severe squalor • There was MINIMAL or no clutter in about half of the cases where we diagnosed substance abuse or alcohol related disorder (and 31% of dementia and 15% of schizophrenia cases). • There was a MAJOR degree of clutter in most (76%) of the cases where we diagnosed personality disorder and no definite DSM-IV mental disorder.

  36. The term ‘severe domestic squalor’ is applied when a person’s home is so unclean, messy and unhygienic that people of similar culture and background would consider extensive clearing and cleaning to be essential. Accumulations of dirt, grime and waste material extend throughout living areas of the dwelling, along with presence or evidence of insects and other vermin. Rotting food, excrement &/or odours are likely to cause feelings of revulsion among visitors. • As well as accumulation of waste, there may have been purposeful collection and/or retention of items to such a degree that it interferes with occupants’ ability to adequately clean up the dwelling.

  37. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANLINESS AND CLUTTER SCALE (all items 0,1,2,3)

  38. BATHROOM & TOILET : 0 = Reasonably clean 1 = MILDLY DIRTY Floor, basin, toilet, walls, etc. Toilet may be unflushed. 2 = MODERATELY DIRTYFloor, basin, shower/bath, etc. Faeces and/or urine on outside of toilet bowl. 3 = VERY DIRTY. Rubbish &/or excrement on floor & in bath or shower &/or basin. Uncleaned for months or years. Toilet may be blocked and bowl full of excreta.

  39. A. ACCESSIBILITY (clutter):

  40. ECCS scores • A total ECCS score of >12 was found to indicate, in most cases, that the occupants were living in moderate or severe squalor. The median ECCS score in cases of SEVERE squalor (as judged by JS and GH) was 22 (inter-quartile range 16 to 24).

  41. A useful question regarding clutter? • Tolin et al (2007), in a handbook for those who compulsively acquire, save and/or hoard, asked “To what extent does the clutter in your home prevent you from using parts of your home for their intended purpose? For example, cooking, using furniture, washing dishes…....” Tolin DF, Frost RO, Steketee G (2007). Buried in Treasures. Help for Compulsive Acquiring, Saving and Hoarding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  42. Interventions • Reports suggest that agencies worldwide are generally uncoordinated and consequently inefficient when trying to intervene and help in cases of squalor. Insufficient attention, resources and research have been committed to improving our understanding and interventions.

  43. NSW Squalor Guidelines • Expression of interest and meetings between Mercy Arms & Central Sydney Area Health (similar previous interactions between South Eastern Sydney Area Health & Waverley Council) • Funding provided by Dept. of Ageing, Disability & Home Care (DADHC) • Project Officer appointed • Reference Group convened

  44. NSW squalor guidelines (process) • Reference Group Meetings (Dec 03-Sept 04) • Brainstorming • Discussion • Sample Cases • 30-item survey of participants/organizations • Legal review • Consultation with other relevant/interested persons • Preparation of Guidelines • Algorithms (illustration of roles & steps) • Benefits of a coordinated approach • Role of the key worker or case manager • Shortfalls • Recommendations

  45. Assessment and management of people living in squalor • Referral • Home visit • Take immediate action if required • Joint agency case conference • Possible interventions (e,f,g,h,i,j,k) • People who resist assessment or help: consider Mental Health Act, Local Government Act, Residential Tenancy Act, guardianship, etc. • Continuing follow-up and supervision to prevent recurrence

  46. Possible interventions • Individual work and case management (flexible and supportive). Care re OH&S issues • Cleaning • Medical and psychiatric services • Home services • Council services • Department of Housing • Residential care

  47. Occupational health and safety • Is the structure of the building safe and secure? • Are there damaged electric wires trailing …. ? • Are there sick or aggressive animals in the dwelling? • Are there fire hazards? • Has there been spillage: urine, faeces, grease, liquids? • Is there a health risk? (mould, ammonia, pathogens) • Is personal protective equipment required? • Are exits from the home blocked? • Etc.

More Related