1 / 38

GeoExchange Economic Considerations

GeoExchange Economic Considerations. Presented by : Warren (Trey) Austin, PE, CEM, CGD, LEED-AP Geo-Energy Services, LLC. Agenda. Basic Design Influences in Cost Residential Financial Factors Commercial Financial Factors. Operational Considerations.

nigel
Télécharger la présentation

GeoExchange Economic Considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GeoExchange Economic Considerations Presented by: Warren (Trey) Austin, PE, CEM, CGD, LEED-AP Geo-Energy Services, LLC

  2. Agenda • Basic Design Influences in Cost • Residential Financial Factors • Commercial Financial Factors

  3. Operational Considerations • Efficiencies of COP and EER are dependent of EWT from Loop Field • EWT typically range from 30°F to 100°F • Typical Operation Pressures are 25 psig to 60 psig • P/T ports are critical for diagnosis & troubleshooting • Use qualified/certified professionals for design and/or installation

  4. Profile Definition • Both Peak (Btu/hr) and Cumulative (Btu) are required to size commercial systems • Residential systems can be sized with peak load calculation and bin data • Must use hourly simulation program • TRACE 700 • eQUEST • HAP • Right Suite

  5. Building Design Consideration • Understanding the daily, monthly, and annual loading profile • Hotel (5-10pm) – 80% occp 5 days • Residence (5-10pm)- 80% occp 7 day • Office (7:30-6:00)- 5 days • Resulting Energy Load to GHEX (5000sqft) • 7550’ • 8100’ • 9200’

  6. Ground Loop Temperature Profile Tfluid = 9600’ Tideal = 32,960’ COPfluid @ 45°F EWT = 3.3 COPideal @ 60°F EWT = 4 EERfluid @ 95°F EWT = 14.1 EERideal @ 70°F EWT = 19.6

  7. Borefield Input Information • Perform Thermal Conductivity Test to obtain: • Primary: • Local Ground Temperature • Formation Thermal Conductivity • Secondary: • Formation Thermal Diffusivity • Not Necessary on all projects; generally: • Systems >20,000 ft2 or >30 tons • Can save 15-25% on installation cost

  8. Site Feasibility • Do vertical structures interfere with layout? • Can the GHEX be phased? • Future expansion needs? • What happens if local ground thermal characteristics are not known?

  9. Economic Feasibility • Simple Payback versus Life Cycle Payback • What are the differences? • Simple is net installation cost divided by the first year utility cost savings • Life Cycle accounts for several factors over a specific period of time, typically 20 years resulting is more accurate and realistic results

  10. Economic Feasibility • Life Cycle Cost Analysis is best way to account for all variables. What are they? • Installation Costs • Maintenance Costs • Utility Rates • Escalation Factors • Cost of Capital • Depreciation

  11. Economic Feasibility • GHEX installation cost is often 90-100% of installation cost differential • If TC Test is completed, use information to obtain preliminary installation cost of GHEX • Eliminate Rule of Thumb when possible

  12. Integration with Renewables • Integration with other renewable technologies, mostly: • Solar Photovoltaic/Geothermal/Wind/Biomass • Solar Thermal • Enhancing and merging technologies to maximize performance and reduce combined economic impacts

  13. Residential Economics • Rebates/Tax Credits • Depend on local utilities • Special Schedules/Tariffs • Direct Financing Options • 30% Federal Tax Credit on “System” cost • Must be Energy Star Rated list @ • www.engergystar.gov

  14. Project Considerations • Be aware of Electrical Requirements • GSHP projects typically need more service • Go from standard 200 amp to 325 amp or 400 amp service • Critical to coordinate with GC or EC • Is 3 phase available, it may reduce needed amp service? • Is PV integrated into system?

  15. Project Considerations • Know the Equipment Functionality • Water-to-Water • Water-to-Air • Single or 2 Stage • Combination Units • W-to-W and W-to-A • W-to-A w/dedicated DHW • Multi-Circuit

  16. Residential Economic Feasibility • Post-ARRA of 2009 LCCA • Installation cost ranges $12.00 to $22.00 / ft2 • Ducted systems vs. Radiant systems can significantly impact installation cost • Accessories such as a zone control system, air filtration, etc. can also affect total cost • Operating costs $0.25 to $0.85 /ft2-yr • Paybacks Average: 2-5 years • Can be immediate to 2 years • Some systems are 6-10 years

  17. Commercial Economics • Prefer Life Cycle Analysis over Simple Payback • Look for 3rd Party Financing Partners for Tax Credits of Non-profit entities • Utilities, ESCOs, Investment firms, or some Geothermal Companies direct • Natural Gas Prices currently make a difficult choice on straight energy savings vs. payback – consider other factors • Can still be competitive for New Construction

  18. Economic Feasibility • Installation cost ranges $18.00 to $24.00 / ft2 • Operating costs $0.45 to $0.85 /ft2-yr • Paybacks Average: 7-11 years • Can be immediate to 4 years • Some systems were 12+ years • Rebates/Tax Credits • Depend on local utilities- special utility rates • 10% Commercial …..plus…….

  19. Economic Feasibility • Rebates/Tax Credits • 5-yr Modified Accelerated Cost-Recovery System (MACRS) • Bonus Depreciation • 50% for 2013 (Renewed) • Stipulations and criterion must be met • www.dsireusa.org/incentives/?State=US&ee=1&re=1 • Click on Corporate Incentives

  20. Example of Bonus Depreciation and 5-yr MACRS

  21. Case Study 1:Retrofit Feasibility Study • Existing Facility • 50,000 ft2 • Built 1970s • Current HVAC – Hodgepodge • Oil Fired Boilers • Rooftfop DX • Mini Splits

  22. Case Study 1: Monthly Energy Consumption

  23. Case Study 1: Monthly Energy Cost* * Worst performing building within building owner’s portfolio

  24. Case Study 1: Summary • First Cost Difference: $650,000 • Life Cycle Cost Savings: $735,000 (20yr) • Simple Payback: 3.9 yrs • Life Cycle Payback: 5.2 (10% Cost of Cap.) • IRR: 25.3% • Eco Impact:

  25. Case Study 2 • PSD Facility Services Building

  26. Footprint Total Number of Boreholes 8,900 ft2 18 Installed Capacity Depth 25 Tons 300’ Number of Units Total Feet of Boreholes 12 Heat Pump Units 5,400’ Case Study 1 • PSD Facility Services Building

  27. Case Study 2

  28. Case Study 2

  29. Case Study 2

  30. Case Study 2 • PSD Facility Services Building

  31. Questions?

More Related