1 / 11

Session 2

Session 2. Managing the global commons : The logic of international cooperation and the problem of the free-rider. What is private, what is public?. First distinction by Jean-Baptiste SAY: free goods vs economics goods Private goods are rival and excludable in consumption

nigel
Télécharger la présentation

Session 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Session 2 Managing the global commons: The logic of international cooperation and the problem of the free-rider

  2. What is private, what is public? • First distinction by Jean-Baptiste SAY: free goods vs economics goods • Private goods are rival and excludable in consumption • > suitable for market transaction • Club goods are excludable but non-rivalrous • Public goods are non-rival and non-excludable in consumption • > unsuitable for market transaction? Market failures? => Does that mean that the provision of private goods is regulated by the market, and the provision of public goods by the state?

  3. Global public goods • Public goods ‘whose benefits cut across several countries and generations’ (Kaul) • Traditional GPGs, governed by international agreements • New GPGs, requiring concerted policy-making • Concern about publicness of benefits • Concerns about publicness of decision-making

  4. Critiques of the definition • Pure public goods are almost impossible to find • Whether a good is private or public is a matter of public policy. Are some goods intrinsically private or public? • Public utility may vary • States are not the only providers of public goods • Suggestions to shift the definition towards: • Inclusiveness: active category, socially constructed • Public provision, participatory decision-making • Fairness and justice, public benefits

  5. The logic of collective action Why do states cooperate?

  6. Assumptions • States are self-interested • Their interests are often conflicting • There’s no central authority • Cooperation, at the end of the day, is about mutual adjustments to national policies so that a common, desirable outcome can be reached. • Model: Prisoner’s dilemma

  7. Conditions for cooperation • Basic conditions: • Reliable information • Reciprocity • Mutual interest • Need for monitoring: role of international organisations as facilitators

  8. The tragedy of the commons • Open-accessgazing land over-exploitedbecause of self interest and lack of constraints. • The field as a metaphor for commongoods: in the absence of regulation and/or property, commongoods are overexploited.

  9. The prisoner’s dilemma • Self-interestisprimary driver • No interestincentive to cooperate on a one-shot basis • Equilibriumcanbereachedonly if the gameisrepeated (and preferencesrevealed : role of international institutions)

  10. The problem of the free rider • Inherent problem of cooperation • How should each member contribute to the provision of the good? • How much can each member benefit from the good? > Issue of compliance

  11. How to define collective preferences from individual preferences? • Collective preferences are not fixed • They’re not always rationnal • They’re not easy to identify and can be contested > The aggregation of individual preferences can lead to a detrimental collective outcome.

More Related