1 / 17

Stephen A. Vigeant, CCM and Carl A. Mazzola, CCM Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure

An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study. Stephen A. Vigeant, CCM and Carl A. Mazzola, CCM Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure. PAMS Mini-Conference, Columbia, SC; April 3, 2009. Outline. Introduction

nikkos
Télécharger la présentation

Stephen A. Vigeant, CCM and Carl A. Mazzola, CCM Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study Stephen A. Vigeant, CCM and Carl A. Mazzola, CCM Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure PAMS Mini-Conference, Columbia, SC; April 3, 2009

  2. Outline • Introduction • Study Objective • Technical Approach • Sensible heat and moisture flux source terms • Atmospheric transport and diffusion • Results • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • Situation: Overseas nuclear power station meteorological monitoring program with 2 instrumented towers (58-meter; 10-meter) • Cooling system: Includes two 12 m x 12 m cooling ponds with elevated water temperatures • Ponds: Located 62 meters from 10-meter tower instrumentation • Issue: Nuclear regulatory agency concerned about possible effects of cooling ponds on 10-meter tower measurements

  4. Study Objective • Develop analytical technique to estimate potential impact of cooling ponds on 10-meter tower temperature and RH measurements • Source Terms: Estimate sensible heat and moisture fluxes from cooling ponds • Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion: Determine impacts of fluxes on 10-meter tower measurements using appropriate model • Use 1-year of onsite data to estimate source term and atmospheric transport and diffusion • Calculate temperature and moisture impacts to 10-meter tower instrumentation

  5. Technical Approach:Sensible Heat and Moisture Fluxes • Bulk aerodynamic formulae of Friehe and Schmitt (1976) selected to estimate sensible heat and moisture fluxes from cooling ponds • Fluxes primarily driven by • Water and air temperature differences • Wind speed above ponds

  6. Sensible Heat and Moisture Fluxes Wind Sensible Heat & Moisture Fluxes Ta Discharge Pond Ts

  7. Technical Approach:Sensible Heat and Moisture Fluxes Sensible Heat Flux Hs = rCpCHU(Ts – Ta) where: Hs = sensible heat flux (cal m-2 sec-1) r = air density (g m-3) Cp = heat capacity of air (cal g-1 °K-1) CH = sensible heat transfer coefficient (dimensionless) U = mean wind speed (m sec-1) at reference height (10 meters) Ts = mean water temperature (°K) Ta = mean air temperature at reference height (10 meters) (°K)

  8. Technical Approach:Sensible Heat and Moisture Fluxes Moisture Flux E = CeU(Qs – Qa) where: E = moisture flux (g m-2 sec-1) Ce = moisture transfer coefficient (dimensionless) U = mean wind speed (m sec-1) at reference height (10 meters) Qs = mean water vapor density (g/m3) near the water surface (assume saturation) Qa = mean water vapor density (g/m3) at reference height (10 meters)

  9. Technical Approach:Sensible Heat and Moisture Fluxes Water vapor densities (Qs and Qa) Qs and Qa = r[(RH x Ws) / (1 + RH x Ws)] where: r = air density (g m-3) Ws = saturation mixing ratio (dimensionless) RH = relative humidity (dimensionless) Qs (based on water temperature) Qa (based on air temperature)

  10. Technical Approach:Sensible Heat and Moisture Flux Source Terms • Calculate hourly sensible heat and moisture fluxes using one year of onsite measurements • Base sensible heat transfer coefficients (CH) on seasonal values obtained from site-specific study • Base moisture transfer coefficient (Ce) on Friehe & Schmitt • Use seasonal intake water temperature measurements • Assume pond temperature is 7°C higher • Assume flux homogeneity over entire pond surface • Multiply calculated fluxes (cal m-2 sec-1; g m-2 sec-1) by pond surface area • Obtain sensible heat and moisture “source terms” (cal sec-1; g sec-1)

  11. Technical Approach:Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion • Determine transport and diffusion of sensible heat and moisture “source terms” • Calculate normalized concentrations (C/Qs) at 10-meter tower located 62 meters from cooling ponds • Use NRC ARCON96 code due to close proximity of source and “receptor” • Horizontal and vertical diffusion coefficients adjusted for plume meander and aerodynamic building wake • Empirical adjustments based on many wind tunnel and atmospheric tracer studies • NUREG/CR-6331 Revision 1 • Use hourly onsite data from 10-m tower: ARCON96 input

  12. Technical Approach:Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion ARCON96 Code Description • Straight-line Eulerian Gaussian plume • Ground-level, vent, and elevated releases • Incorporates low wind speed plume meander • Incorporates aerodynamic building wake effects • Valid at source-receptor distances as close as 10 meters • Recommended by NRC for use in control room habitability analyses in Regulatory Guide 1.194

  13. Technical Approach:Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion ARCON96 Code Input Options • Area source (virtual point) option used for cooling ponds • Sector averaging constant (4.3) • Wind direction sector width (90 degrees azimuth) • Surface roughness length (0.2 m) • One year of hourly onsite meteorological data

  14. Technical Approach:Sensible Heat and Moisture Concentrations • Multiply sensible heat (cal sec-1) and moisture (g sec-1) fluxes by calculated ARCON96 C/Q values (sec m-3) • Obtain hourly values of sensible heat (XH) (cal m-3) and moisture concentration (Xw) (g m-3) at 10-m tower instruments XH = Hs (C/Q) Sensible Heat Concentration XW = E (C/Q) Water Vapor Concentration

  15. Technical Approach:Pond Sensible Heat and Moisture Impact Calculations Calculate increase in temperature (DTa) at 10-meter tower DTa = XH/Cpr Calculate increase in RH (DRH) at 10-meter tower DRH = 100 x [XW (g m-3) / rW (g m-3)]

  16. Results • Temperature Impact • Largest hourly temperature impact: + 0.2°C • Increase between 0.10°C - 0.19°C (0.3% of time) • Increase between 0.01°C - 0.09°C (24% of time) • Increase of < 0.01°C (14% of time) • No impact when wind direction outside of 90-degree azimuth ARCON96 window (62% of time) • RH Impact • Largest hourly RH impact: + 0.7% • ANSI/ANS-3.11 (2005) and NRC Regulatory Guide 1.23 Revision 1 accuracy requirements • Air temperature ± 0.5 °C • RH ± 4%

  17. Conclusions • Temperature and moisture increases due to presence of discharge ponds at 10-meter tower not significant • Slight increases • Much smaller than ANSI/ANS-3.11 accuracy standard for each parameter • Have no meaningful effect on meteorological data used to evaluate environmental impacts of nuclear power plant • No effect of discharge pond on wind speed and wind direction is expected

More Related