1 / 46

The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making

The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. Scott Plous Wesleyan University, 1993. Overview. Compendium that aggregates decades of research on judgment and decision making Primarily from Psychology, but pulls in a few other fields Our approach today:

Télécharger la présentation

The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making Scott Plous Wesleyan University, 1993

  2. Overview • Compendium that aggregates decades of research on judgment and decision making • Primarily from Psychology, but pulls in a few other fields • Our approach today: • Complete the Reader survey as a class • Walk through each chapter • Describe the concepts • Discuss examples from reader survey • Discuss application to MIS research

  3. Section I Perception, Memory, and Context

  4. Ch1: Selective Perception • There is no such thing as immaculate perception. What you see depends upon what you thought before you looked.-Myron Tribus • There is no such thing as context-free decision making. All judgments and decisions rest on the way we see and interpret the world.-Scott Plous

  5. Ch2: Cognitive Dissonance • We are motivated to reduce or avoid psychological inconsistencies • Self-perception theory • Dissonance has more to do with how people infer their beliefs from watching themselves behave • The brain wants the world to make sense and will create explanations such that it does • i.e. if I perform a task for a small amount of money, I must derive enjoyment from the task, but if I was highly compensated, I was motivated by the money. • Can be pre-decisional or post-decisional

  6. Ch2: Cognitive Dissonance Relevance to MIS • System design • User behavior • Deception detection • Induces physiological changes

  7. Ch3: Memory and Hindsight Biases • What is memory? • Not copies of experiences on deposit in a data bank • Reconstructive, dependent upon contextual factors • Hindsight bias • Tendency to view what has already happened as inevitable and obvious without recognizing that retrospective knowledge is influencing one’s judgment • Strategies to avoid • Stop to consider reasons why the results may have turned out differently

  8. Ch3: Memory and Hindsight Biases – survey examples • Memory is reconstructive and highly dependent upon contextual factors: • (34a) "The ants ate the jelly which was on the table." • Did this sentence appeared before or not? Confidence rating: ___ • (34b) "The ants in the kitchen ate the sweet jelly which was on the table." • Did this sentence appeared before or not? Confidence rating: ___ • (34c) "The ants ate the sweet jelly." • Did this sentence appeared before or not? Confidence rating: ___

  9. Ch3: Memory and Hindsight Biases Relevance to MIS • System design • System adoption • Acceptance of technology

  10. Ch4: Context Dependence • Contrast effects • Our perceptions can be different based upon the context in which they occur • Hot, cold, warm water • Primacy effect • Characteristics appearing early influence impressions more than ones appearing later • Envious, stubborn, critical, impulsive, industrious, and intelligent vs. • Intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical, stubborn, and envious • Recency effect • Able to remember more recent information more readily than older information • Halo effect • Tendency to treat a set of characteristics in a similar manner – all high, all low– even when they should not necessarily be related

  11. Ch4: Context Dependence Relevance to MIS • System design • How interfaces are perceived (contrast/halo) • Efficiency – what do you look at first and how does that impact context/decisions • Recency – what does the system expect the user to remember (use/training)

  12. Section II How questions affect answers

  13. Ch5: Plasticity • Plasticity: Malleability of responses based on situation • Order effects • The order in which questions are asked can influence the perceived context and as a result influence responses • Pseudo-opinions • When people are familiar with an issue, context and order produce marginal changes of opinion • When people have little familiarity, they are more easily influenced • If they know nothing, sometimes they will still offer a “pseudo-opinion” • Can drastically influence political affairs • Inconsistency • Discrepancy between two related attitudes or between an attitude and a corresponding behavior • Can illustrate cognitive dissonance and also that situational factors can introduce complications – abstract attitudes can bear little relation to specific actions

  14. Ch5: Plasticity Relevance to MIS • System design • Order effects in UI • Adoption • Pseudo-opinions and inconsistency can impact project success

  15. Ch6: The Effects of Question Wording and Framing • It’s not what you ask • It’s how you ask

  16. Ch6: The Effects of Question Wording and Framing (cont.) • Word choice, safe vs. safer • Forced choice (e.g., faster vs. slower) vs. middle category(e.g., faster vs. same as now vs. slower) • Open (fill in the blank) vs. closed (a, b, c, and or d, etc.) • Norbert Schwarz et al. noted “Response scales are not simply ‘measurement devices’ that respondents use to report their behaviors. Rather . . . respondents may use the range of behaviors[emphasis added] described in the response alternatives as a frame of reference in estimating and evaluating their own behavior [emphasis added]” (as cited in Plous 1993, p. 67).

  17. Ch6: The Effects of Question Wording and Framing (cont.) • Social desirability – some answers may be more socially desirable than others • Allowing vs. forbidding • Types of speech • Peep shows, X-rated movies • “Framing” • Tversky and Kahneman stated a decision frame [emphasis added] is “the decision maker's conception of the acts, outcomes, and contingencies associated with a particular choice” (as cited in Plous 1993, p. 69). • Very, very important in information security, gain security or lose freedom

  18. Ch6: The Effects of Question Wording and Framing (cont.) • Deductive logic • “Extra” taxes for childless families, not tax deductions for families with children • Psychological accounting • Psychological accounting requires some notion of reference points/accounts. • We just saw an MIS Speaker Series on Mental Accounting (without reference). • Before relying on results from survey research [emphasis added] and other studies of judgment and decision making [emphasis added], it is important to consider how people's answers would have changed as a function of factors such as:

  19. Ch6: The Effects of Question Wording and Framing (cont.) • The order in which the questions were presented • The context in which the questions appeared • Whether the question format was open or closed • Whether the questions were filtered • Whether the questions contained catch phrases • The range of suggested response alternatives • The order in which response alternatives were presented • Whether middle categories were provided • Whether problems were framed in terms of gains or losses * More to come

  20. Ch6: The Effects of Question Wording and Framing Relevance to MIS • Measures • Survey or not, you have to ask questions • System design • UI Question wording and framing

  21. Section IV Heuristics and Biases

  22. Ch10: The Representativeness Heuristic • The Law of Small Numbers • The Hot Hand • Neglecting Base Rates • Nonregressive Prediction • Clinical Versus Actuarial Prediction

  23. Ch10: The Representativeness Heuristic Relevance to MIS • System design • What information do we present? • How to mitigate heuristic based bias with UI design • Decision making • Understanding decision-making heuristics key to interpreting user behavior • Summarization and dashboarding • Are we providing the correct context (base rates, etc.)

  24. Ch11: The Availability Heuristic • Availability Goes A Wry • The Limits of Imagination • Denial • Nuclear war • Vividness • The Legal Significance of Guacamole • A Disclaimer

  25. Ch11: The Availability Heuristic Relevance to MIS • System design • What comparisons are people making when they interact with the system? • Experiments and Measures

  26. Ch12: Probability and Risk • Confusion of The Inverse • It'll Never Happen To Me • Compound Events • Conservatism • The Perception of Risk • Do Accidents Make Us Safer? • Recommendations

  27. Ch12: Probability and Risk Relevance to MIS • IT deployment and valuation • User actions • Experiments and Measures

  28. Ch13: Anchoring and Adjustment • Thinking About The Unthinkable • How Real is Real Estate? • Further Examples of Anchoring

  29. Ch13: Anchoring and Adjustment Relevance to MIS • System design • User interface • What information is presented as anchor? • IT Deployment and economics • Experiments and Measures

  30. Ch14: The Perception of Randomness • An Unlikely Development • Luck And Superstition • Recognizing Randomness • Seeing Patterns In Randomness • Can People Behave Randomly? • Learning To Act Randomly

  31. Ch14: The Perception of Randomness Relevance to MIS • ADMIT & CAT • People can be trained to behave randomly • UI for data analysis and pattern recognition

  32. Ch15: Correlation, Causation, and Control • Does God Answer Prayers? • Illusory Correlation • Invisible Correlations • Getting By • Causalation • Heads I Win, Tails It's Chance • The Kind Of Help That Doesn't Help

  33. Ch15: Correlation, Causation, and Control Relevance to MIS • Experiments and Measures • Data analysis • Researcher • User • Prescriptive systems and behavior change • Perception of control

  34. Ch16: Attribution Theory • Analysis of Variance Framework • The Person - Consensus • The Entity – Stimulus • The Time – Circumstance • A Lack Of Consensus • Salience • The Fundamental Attribution Error • My Situation Is Your Disposition • there is a pervasive tendency for actors to attribute their actions to situational requirements, whereas observers tend to attribute the same actions to stable personal dispositions. • Trading Places

  35. Ch16: Attribution Theory – cont. • Clinical Implications • For observers, the actor is most salient; for the actor, situational demands are salient • Other Attributional Biases • "self-serving" bias • "egocentric" biases • "positivity effect" is a tendency to attribute positive behaviors to dispositional factors and negative behaviors to situational factors • "negativity effect" disliked others the "ultimate attribution error“ • the tendency to ascribe less variability to others than to oneself • Debiasing • Pay Close Attention to Consensus: If most people behave similarly when confronted by the same situation, a dispositional explanation is probably unwarranted. Instead, observers should look to situational factors for an explanation of behavior. • Ask How You Would Have Behaved In The Same Circumstance

  36. Ch16: Attribution Theory Relevance to MIS • Experiments and Measures • Data analysis • User behavior and prescriptive systems

  37. Section V The Social Side of Judgment and Decision Making

  38. Ch17: Social Influences • Social Facilitation • Social Loafing • Scene 1: "Let That Girl Alone!“ • Scene 2: Tunnel Vision • Scene 3: Picking Up The Pieces • Bystander Intervention • Social Comparison Theory • Taking Cues From Those Who Are Similar • Social Analgesia • Conformity • Minority Influence • Groupthink

  39. Ch17: Social Influences Relevance to MIS • Individual behavior when a group is present • Motivation • Experiments and Measures • Social desirability • Society and culture

  40. Ch18: Group Judgments and Decisions • Group Errors and Biases • Group Polarization • Horse Sense • Are Several Heads Better Than One? • The Benefits Of Dictatorship

  41. Ch18: Group Judgments and Decisions Relevance to MIS • Group behavior and interactions • System design • Group Support Systems • Online interaction • Social networking • Experimental design

  42. Section VI Common Traps

  43. Ch19: Overconfidence • The Case Of Joseph Kidd • Extreme Confidence • When Overconfidence Becomes A Capital Offense • Calibration • The Correlation Between Confidence And Accuracy • How Can Overconfidence Be Reduced? • Stop to consider reasons why your judgment might be wrong.

  44. Ch20: Self-Fulfilling Prophecies • Guess Again • Self-Perpetuating Social Beliefs • The Pygmalion Effect • In The Minds Of Men • Self-Fulfilling Racial Stereotypes

  45. Ch21: Behavioral Traps • A Taxonomy Of Traps • Time delay traps • Ignorance traps • Investment traps • Deterioration traps • Collective traps • Prisoner's Dilemma • How Much Would You Pay For A Dollar? • Knee Deep In The Big Muddy • The Great Escape

  46. Conclusions • Psychological biases are an intrinsic part of the way humans make judgments and decisions • It is important to take these biases into consideration when conducting MIS research • System Design • Experiment Design • Biases impact not just subjects, but researchers themselves

More Related