1 / 19

Stopping Criteria

Stopping Criteria. Is the residual check appropriate as the stopping condition? It is known that relative corrections of field variables and design variables are independent of a grid size. Thus, see if these grid independent properties are adequate as the stopping condition.

ninon
Télécharger la présentation

Stopping Criteria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stopping Criteria • Is the residual check appropriate as the stopping condition? • It is known that relative corrections of field variables and design variables are independent of a grid size. • Thus, see if these grid independent properties are adequate as the stopping condition.

  2. Save do(w, θ) at the current grid Repeat MG cycle λk times Update the design Save d1(w, θ) and compute r = ||d1-do|| No converged? Yes Case #1 • Correction of field variables (w, θ) between the design updates is the stopping condition. • A fixed number of MG cycle is run before the design. (λk is 3 in the example)

  3. converged? converged? Case #2 Save do(w, θ) at the current grid • This is an alternative of the case 1. Likewise, a correction of field variables is the stopping condition. • Only different is that we do not run a fixed number of MG cycle but use the residual checking. MG cycle No Yes Update the design Save d1(w, θ) and compute r = ||d1-do|| No Yes

  4. Save bo(b) at the current grid Repeat MG cycle λk times Update the design Save b1(b) and compute r = ||b1-bo|| No converged? Yes Case #3 • Correction of design variables (b) between the design updates is the stopping condition. • A fixed number of MG cycle is run before the design. (λk is 3 in the example)

  5. converged? converged? Case #4 Save bo(b) at the current grid • This is an alternative of the case 3. Likewise, a correction of design variables is the stopping condition. • Only different is that we do not run a fixed number of MG cycle but use the residual checking. MG cycle No Yes Update the design Save b1(b) and compute r = ||b1-bo|| No Yes

  6. Result (Epsilon = 1e-3) Matrix solver’s results (1e-6)

  7. Final shape of the beam

  8. Total number of cell update - FMG vs. MG

  9. FMG vs. MG result - the case #1 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-3)

  10. FMG vs. MG result - the case #2 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-3)

  11. FMG vs. MG result - the case #3 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-3)

  12. FMG vs. MG result - the case #4 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-3)

  13. More result (Epsilon = 1e-4)

  14. Total number of cell update - FMG vs. MG

  15. FMG vs. MG result - the case #1 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-4)

  16. FMG vs. MG result - the case #2 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-4)

  17. FMG vs. MG result - the case #3 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-4)

  18. FMG vs. MG result - the case #4 (S = 10, Epsilon = 1e-4)

More Related