1 / 10

CSC DQA for Last Week

This overview outlines the recent activities and findings from the Data Quality Assessment (DQA) for CSC runs 124747 and 124887 as conducted by Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, and Xiaowen Lei from the University of Arizona. Key issues discussed include unresolved DQMF segment runs, denied access points, and the status of offline data monitoring. The presentation also highlights the need to engage with experts regarding ROD errors, which were present in both runs. Future work will involve analyzing cosmic data to improve DQA processes.

nira
Télécharger la présentation

CSC DQA for Last Week

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CSC DQA for Last Week Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei University of Arizona

  2. Overview • Online • Runs 124747 and 124887 • DQMF segment not run – must work with M. Schernau to include • Point 1 access initially denied – must resolve with Muon shift leaders in future • Offline • CSC RawDataMonitoring not included in Tier0 processing • Unclear why turned off since we signed off on 15.2.0 validation – must resolve this with N. Benekos • Will try to process ourselves this weekend

  3. Overview • Pedestals • Analyzed by C. Lampen but I did not have time to prepare slides for this talk • In general, having several runs of CSC cosmic data to analyze will allow us to make the online and offline DQA more effective

  4. ROD Errors • Have not had a chance to talk with ROD experts • Still sorting out what are real problems and what are not • Little experience until now to interpret the histograms with real data

  5. ROD Errors • Run 124747 • Only 4 RODS with 50% errors

  6. ROD Errors • Run 124887 • Somewhat better

  7. Run 124887 • High level hit maps (ROD clusters)

  8. Run 124887 • Detailed hit maps (ROD clusters)

  9. Run 124887 • Detailed hit maps (analyzed clusters)

  10. Run 124887 • Segment finding

More Related