1 / 36

Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment

Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy. A consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Clerk 陳威任.

nira
Télécharger la présentation

Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy A consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Clerk 陳威任

  2. “ developed the following consensus approach to the management of hyperglycemia to help us in choosing the most appropriate interventions for their patients with type 2 diabetes.”

  3. Process

  4. The guidelines and algorithm that follow are derived from two sources • clinical trials that address the effectiveness and safety of the different modalities of therapy • reviewed a wide variety of studies related to the use of drugs as monotherapy or in combination to lower glycemia • collective knowledge and clinical experience, which takes into account benefits, risks, costs

  5. Glycemic goals of therapy

  6. The most recent glycemic goal recommended by the American Diabetes Association is an A1C level of 7% • International Diabetes Federation : A1C level of 6.5%. • upper limit of the nondiabeticrange is 6.1% with the DCCT/UKPDS standardizedassay • ACCORD study , ADVANCE trial

  7. Principles in selectingantihyperglycemic interventions

  8. lowering glucose • extraglycemic effects that may reduce long-term complications • safety • tolerability • ease of use • expense

  9. Lifestyle interventions

  10. Lifestyle interventions • The major environmental factors that ↑ the risk of type 2 DM : overnutrition and a sedentary lifestyle, →overweight and obesity • Limit: high rate of weight regain • Most convincing long term data: follow-up of DM pts have had bariatric surgery • weight loss of 20 kg, diabetes is eliminated • Beneficial effects:↓CVDrisk, few side effects

  11. lifestyle intervention program to promote weight loss and increase activity levels should be included as part of diabetes management • Weight loss of as little as 4 kg • the limited long-term success of lifestyle programs to maintain glycemic goals in patients with type 2 diabetes suggests that the large part of patients will require the addition of medications

  12. Medications

  13. intrinsic characteristics, • duration of diabetes, • baseline glycemia, • previous therapy, • other factors • Major factor: glycemic control • Individualized for each pt • Long term benefit(SE, ease of use, expense…)

  14. Metformin • ↓hepatic glucose output , ↓fasting glycemia • monotherapy will ↓A1C levels by 1.5 • Safe, without causing hypoglycemia • SE:GI, modest weight loss • UKPDS: CVD outcomes • Contraindication: Renal dysfunction • eGFR < 30 ml/min

  15. Sulfonylureas • enhancing insulin secretion • ↓ A1C levels by 1.5 • SE: hypoglycemia(esp. chlorpropamide, glyburide), weight gain(~2kg) • UGDP study: ↑CVDmortality • Benefit at half-maximal dose, avoid high dose

  16. Glinides • stimulate insulin secretion • repaglinide is as effective as metformin or the sulfonylureas • ↓A1C levels by 1.5 • Weight gain, less hypoglycemia

  17. Alpha-Glucosidase inhibitors • ↓rate of digestion of polysaccharides • less effective inlowering glycemia than metformin, sulfonylureas, • ↓A1C levels by 0.5– 0.8 • ↑delivery of carbohydrateto the colon • ↑gas production and GIsymptoms • 25–45%of participants have discontinued

  18. Thiazolidinediones(TZD) • ↑the sensitivity of muscle,fat, and liver to endogenous andexogenous insulin (“insulin sensitizers”) • 0.5–1.4 decrease in A1C • durable effect on glycemiccontrol • SE:weightgain, fluid retention • 2X increased risk for CHF • 30 –40% relative ↑in risk forMI(rosiglitazone) • Pioglitazone was associated with a16% ↓in death, MI,and stroke

  19. Insulin • The most effective at lowering glycemia • Beneficial effects: TG, HDL, cholesterol • Weight gain, hypoglycemia

  20. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists • glucose-stimulated insulin secretion • lower A1C levels by 0.5–1 • Mainly lowering postprandial blood glucose • ↓glucagon secretion and slows gastric motility. • not associated with hypoglycemia, high frequency of GI disturbances, • 30–45% pt experience N/V, diarrhea

  21. Amylin agonists (pramlintide) • synthetic analogue of the beta cell hormone amylin • A1C has been decreased by 0.5– 0.7 • SE:GI. • 30% of PTs have developed nausea • Weight loss

  22. Dipeptidyl peptidase four inhibitors • DPP-4 inhibitors are small molecules that enhance the effects of GLP-1 and GIP, ↑ glucose-mediated insulin secretion and ↓glucagon secretion • LowerA1Clevels by 0.6–0.9 • do not cause hypoglycemia • interfere with immunefunction is of concern; • an increasein upper respiratory infections has beenreported

  23. How to initiate diabetes therapy andadvance interventions

  24. The patient is the key player in the diabetes care team and should be trained and empowered to adjust medications with the guidance of health care professionals to achieve glycemic goals and to prevent and treat hypoglycemia. • the use of combination therapy • Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is an important element in adjusting or adding new interventions and,intitrating insulin doses

  25. The goal is to achieve and maintain A1C levels of 7% and to change interventions at as rapid a pace as titration of medications allows when target glycemic goals are not being achieved. • Mounting evidence suggests that aggressive lowering of glycemia, especially with insulin therapy, in newly diagnosed diabetes can result in sustained remissions

  26. Rationale for selecting specificcombinations

  27. In general, antihyperglycemicdrugs with different mechanisms of action will have the greatest synergy(協同) • Insulin+ metformin is a particularlyeffective means of lowering glycemiawhile limiting weight gain

  28. Conclusion

  29. much of the morbidity associated with long-term microvascularand neuropathic complications can be substantially reduced by interventionsthat achieve glucose levels close to the nondiabeticrange • current-day management has failed to achieve and maintain the glycemic levels most likely to provide optimal healthcare status for people with diabetes.

  30. Summary

  31. Achievement and maintenance of near normoglycaemia(A1C 7.0%) • Initial therapy with lifestyle intervention and metformin • Rapid addition of medications, and transition to new regimens, when target glycemic goals are not achieved or sustained • Early addition of insulin therapy in patients who do not meet target goals

  32. Thank YOU

More Related