1 / 39

Padmini Parthasarathy, MPH Cheri Pies, MSW, DrPH Family, Maternal and Child

Applying the Life Course Perspective in a Local MCAH Program. Padmini Parthasarathy, MPH Cheri Pies, MSW, DrPH Family, Maternal and Child Health Programs, Contra Costa Health Services. Acknowledgements. Drs. Michael Lu and Neal Halfon, UCLA Dr. Paula Braveman, UCSF

nishi
Télécharger la présentation

Padmini Parthasarathy, MPH Cheri Pies, MSW, DrPH Family, Maternal and Child

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Applying the Life Course Perspective in a Local MCAH Program Padmini Parthasarathy, MPH Cheri Pies, MSW, DrPH Family, Maternal and Child Health Programs, Contra Costa Health Services

  2. Acknowledgements • Drs. Michael Lu and Neal Halfon, UCLA • Dr. Paula Braveman, UCSF • Contra Costa Health Services: • Cheri Pies, Director, FMCH Programs • Chuck McKetney, Epidemiologist • Debbie Casanova, Evaluator • Dawn Dailey, Program Manager

  3. Overview • The Life Course Perspective • Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health • Life Course Game • Contra Costa Life Course Initiative • Our Road Map • Our First Destination: Building Economic Security Today (BEST)

  4. Life Course Perspective • A way of looking at life not as disconnected stages, but as an integrated continuum • Suggests that a complex interplay ofbiological, behavioral, psychological, and social protective and risk factors contributes to health outcomes across the span of a person’s life

  5. Percent of Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care, by Race/Ethnicity, Contra Costa, 2004-2006 Source: Contra Costa County’s Automated Vital Statistics System (AVSS)

  6. Rate of Low Birth Weight Births (per 100 live births), by Race/Ethnicity, Contra Costa, 2002-2004 Source: California Department of Health Services, Birth Statistical Master Files, 2002-2004

  7. Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births), by Race/Ethnicity, Contra Costa, 2003-2005 Source: California Department of Health Services, Birth Statistical Master Files and Death Statistical Master Files, 2002-2004

  8. Protective factors Risk factors The Life Course Perspective(Lu and Halfon, 2003)

  9. Key Concepts • Early Programming • Cumulative Pathways

  10. Latina Paradox • Latinas living in the United States but born abroad have birth outcomes similar to White women • Birth outcomes worsen with each following generation

  11. Disparity, Inequality,or Inequity? • HEALTH DISPARITY = INEQUALITY = difference in the health status of two groups • HEALTH INEQUITY = systematic and unjust differences in the distribution of illness and disease; differences are unnecessary and avoidable Not all inequalities are unjust, but all inequities are the product of unjust inequalities.

  12. Social Advantage and Health Across Lifetimes and Generations Prepared for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation by the Center on Social Disparities in Health at the University of California, San Francisco.

  13. The Life Course Game

  14. The Life Course Initiative • Launched in 2005 • A 15-year initiative • Based on the Life Course Perspective and a 12-Point Plan to close the Black-White gap in birth outcomes

  15. Life Course Initiative Goals • Reduce health disparities and health inequities • Optimize reproductive potential • Create a paradigm shiftin MCH work

  16. Life Course Initiative Goals • To change the health of a generation

  17. Life Course Initiative Activities • Staff education • Laying the groundwork with higher- level management • Interconception care • Evaluation • Developing a new intervention

  18. Evaluation • Established Life Course Initiative Data Team, which meets regularly • Conducted survey of Family, Maternal and Child Health Programs staff • Identifying “intermediate outcomes” as measurements of success of Life Course-related activities (vs. long-term perinatal outcomes)

  19. Our Road Map:A 12-Point Plan… • To close the Black-White gap in birth outcomes • Goes beyond prenatal care • Goes beyond individual-level interventions • Goes beyond the medical model

  20. Our Road Map: A 12-Point Plan • Provide interconception care to women with prior adverse pregnancy outcomes • Increase access to preconception care for African American women • Improve the quality of prenatal care • Expand healthcare access over the life course

  21. Our Road Map: A 12-Point Plan • Strengthen father involvement in African American families • Enhance service coordination and systems integration • Create reproductive social capital in African American communities • Invest in community building and urban renewal

  22. Our Road Map: A 12-Point Plan • Close the education gap • Reduce poverty • Support working mothers and families

  23. Our Road Map: A 12-Point Plan • Undo racism

  24. Our First Destination Increased financial security and stability and improved financial status

  25. Building Economic Security Today (BEST) • Asset development pilot project • Reduce disparities and inequities in health outcomes by improving financial security and stability • Home visiting programs & WIC

  26. How does BEST fit intothe 12-Point Plan? • Reduce poverty • Support working mothers and families

  27. Generational Financial Fitness • Children learn about how to manage money from their parents • Financial education for parents now  financial stability in next generation

  28. Project Activities • Life Course Data Team: Evaluation Plan • Staff trainings • Unnatural Causes • Applying for grants • Partnerships • Developing home visiting and WIC interventions

  29. Intermediate Outcomes • Staff: • Increased knowledge • Improved skills • New practices

  30. Intermediate Outcomes • Clients: • Increased knowledge • Improved ability • Adopt at least one asset development strategy

  31. Intermediate Outcomes • System: • Stronger community partnerships • More supportive health and human services system • Integration of asset development strategies into FMCH Programs’ infrastructure • BEST project development documentation

  32. Long-Term Outcomes Family income for daily living maximized Preservation of and increase in financial assets Increased financial security and stability, and improved financial status Increased access to care, improved housing, better neighborhoods, increased food security, decreased violence, etc. Improved health outcomes and financial status for future generations

  33. Challenges • Making paradigm shift and gaining staff buy-in is a slow process • Addressing financial status and security sensitively • Learning and integrating many new concepts • Time and financial resources • Measuring success

  34. Lessons Learned • Flexible timeline in order to accommodate program priorities • Opportunities to collaborate with new partners • Develop evaluation plan while developing program interventions • Unique approach re-energizes both staff and community partners

  35. What will success look like?

  36. For More Information Padmini Parthasarathy 925-313-6178 pparthas@hsd.cccounty.us

More Related