240 likes | 595 Vues
Fish and Zooplankton Interactions. Wetzel Chapter 16, pp. 460-468. Interactions between Fish and ZP . Predation Alteration of trophic structures Nutrient cycling. Feeding Relationships Among Fish. Feeding defined: acquisition of both energy and nutrients for growth and reproduction
E N D
Fish and Zooplankton Interactions Wetzel Chapter 16, pp. 460-468
Interactions between Fish and ZP • Predation • Alteration of trophic structures • Nutrient cycling
Feeding Relationships Among Fish • Feeding defined: acquisition of both energy and nutrients for growth and reproduction • Cost/Benefit Analysis: do the costs of food acquisition exceed energy gained from consumption – Maximize return per unit effort
Prey Density and Diet Shifting • If prey are large and scarce, fish consume them one at a time • If prey are small and abundant, fish will filter water column – Mechanical Sieving • Obviously, these statements apply to fish capable of doing this and of the correct trophic status – i.e. adult walleye will not do this, but walleye larvae will
Ontogenetic Diet Shift in Yellow Perch – Wu and Culver 1992 • As zooplankton occur less and less frequently, yellow perch young-of-year switch from zooplankton to benthic macroinvertebrates • This was found both in the lab and in nature • Function of the development of digestive organs
Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey
Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature
Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature • Selectivity vs. Length
Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature • Selectivity vs. Length • Selectivity vs. Eye Diameter
Predation of ZP by Fish • Study from Liu and Herzig • Distribution in lake of possible prey • Selectivity of larger sized individuals • Prey sizes present in gut vs. prey sizes in nature • Selectivity vs. Length • Selectivity vs. Eye Diameter • Conclusion: Prey visibility and parts that are visible make a difference
Predation of ZP by Fish • Predation by fish can shape communities of zooplankton • Relationship between size selection and foraging efficiency • Ex: Bluegill (p. 462 in Wetzel & refs therein) • Selects prey on basis of size • Growth rates increase with increasing food size • Increased efficiency (higher return with large prey) • Size selection based on search time and handling time • When there is low density of prey, more likely to take prey of any size • As prey density increased, search time decreased and small classes are consumed less frequently
Predation of ZP by Fish • Another example of Size Selectivity • Crystal Lake, Connecticut (Brooks and Dodson, 1965) • No alewife – large zp • Alewife introduced – shift to smaller zp • But why were larger present in the first place and no coexistence of all sizes?
Size Efficiency Hypothesis • When size-selective predation not occurring in lakes, small zooplankton not found to occur with larger zooplankton • The Hypothesis: • Planktonic herbivore zp compete for small food particles in the pelagic zone of a lake • Larger zp filter more efficiently and can take larger particles – this allows for reduced metabolic maintenance demands allowing for more devotion of energy to reproduction
Size Efficiency Hypothesis (3) Therefore, larger forms come to dominate (4) However, if fish size-selective predation is intense, larger forms are selected to be eaten, allowing smaller forms to dominate (5) If predation pressure is moderate, large forms are reduced and this allows coexistence of forms • Some evidence for this – Threshold food concentrations • Amount of food to satisfy metabolic upkeep decreases with increasing body sizes • In Cladocerans, Gliwicz 1990; however, rotifers may not follow the same patterns
Food Limitations in ZP • If food is limiting, body sizes and mass are reduced and reproduction is minimal • Interaction of food limitation and size selective feeding shapes the community • Which is more important depends on lake characters
Conclusions • Fish and ZP interact through predation • How this actually shapes the communities is dependent of many different forces