1 / 46

Module 5: Relationships

Module 5: Relationships. -- in bibliographic records and in authority records. Relationships: two parts. The entities being related Work, expression, manifestation, item, person, family, corporate body, etc.

nitsa
Télécharger la présentation

Module 5: Relationships

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Module 5:Relationships -- in bibliographic records and in authority records

  2. Relationships: two parts • The entities being related • Work, expression, manifestation, item, person, family, corporate body, etc. • Identified by the authorized access point or an identifier or a description (RDA 18.4; RDA 24.4 • The type of relationship • Identified by a relationship designator -- library policy or cataloger’s judgment to use

  3. Entities in relationships: Group 2 to Group 1 Persons, families, and corporate bodies related to a resource -- relationships in bibliographic records Creators and others associated with works (ch. 19) -- discussed in module 3 Contributors associated with expressions (ch. 20) Entities related to manifestations (ch. 21) Entities related to items (ch. 22) 3

  4. Relationships between persons/families/bodies and resources Person Work created was created by Shakespeare Hamlet

  5. [Screen image from the RDA Toolkit (www.rdatoolkit.org) used by permission of the Co-Publishers for RDA (American Library Association, Canadian Library Association, and CILIP: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals)]

  6. Primary relationships • Two entities covered by naming the work or expression (the counterpart to AACR2 “main entry” in MARC): • Work manifested (RDA 17.8) • Expression manifested (RDA 17.10) • Compilations discussed in module 3: analytical access points for 17.8 & 17.10

  7. Relationship for entities related to works • Give as authorized access point in MARC 1XX field (and 7XX field if more than one creator or if not a creator)in bibliographic record • Relationship designators from RDA appendix I.2 in subfield $e of 1XX and 7XX field -- not required • Not a closed list • Do not include $e in name authority record

  8. Relationships with works -- examples • Examples of creators: • Examples of others associated with works (19.3): 110 $a Society of Linguists, $e author. 710 $a Linguists International, $e author. 100 $a Glass, Philip, $e composer. 110 $a Virginia, $e enacting jurisdiction. 710 $a U.S. Geology Society, $e issuing body. 710 $a ABC Institute, $e sponsoring body.

  9. Contributor (RDA 20.2): relationship with expressions • A person, family, or corporate body associated with an expression, e.g., • Translators • Editors of compilations • Performers • Illustrators • Arrangers of music • Compilers 9

  10. Relationship for contributors • Give as authorized access point in MARC 7XX fields in bibliographic record • Relationship designators from RDA appendix I.3 in subfield $e of 7XX field - not required • Not a closed list • Do not include $e in name authority record

  11. Example: contributor 100 1# $a Wood, Audrey. 245 14 $a The napping house / $c Audrey Wood ; illustrated by Don Wood. 700 1# $a Wood, Don, $e illustrator. Notes: 1) Relationship designator “author” could be given for creator in 100 field. 2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; also, it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field. 11

  12. Example: contributor 100 1# $a Lindgren, Astrid, $d 1907-2002, $e author. 240 10 $a Pippi Långstrump. $l English 245 10 $a Pippi Longstocking / $c Astrid Lindgren ; translated by Tiina Nunnally. 700 1# $aNunnally, Tiina, $d 1952- $e translator. Notes: 1) Relationship designators “author” and “translator” could be given -- cataloger judgment. 2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; also, it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field. 12

  13. Example: contributor 245 $a Favorite American music / $c performed by the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra with Marin Alsop conducting.. 505 $a ... 710 $a Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, $e performer. 700 $a Alsop, Marin, $e conductor.* * Could have used the more general “$e performer” for Alsop.

  14. Entities associated with manifestations (RDA 21.0) A person, family, or corporate body associated with a manifestation, e.g., Producers Publishers (e.g., broadcasters) Manufacturers (e.g., engravers, printers) Distributors (e.g., film distributor) 14

  15. Entities associated with manifestations • Give as authorized access point in MARC 7XX fields in bibliographic record • Specific relationship designators from RDA appendix I.4 in subfield $e of 7XX field -- not required • Not “producer,” “publisher,” “manufacturer,” “distributor” -- they are elements • Not a closed list • Do not include $e in name authority record

  16. Examples: manifestation 260 $a Bethesda : $b NIH, $c 2008. 710 $a National Institutes of Health (U.S.), $e broadcaster. 260 $a St. Paul : $b West Publishing Company, $c 2011- 710 $a West Publishing Company.* * Cannot use “publisher” as an RDA relationship designator because that relationship is an element.

  17. Entities associated with items (RDA 22.0) A person, family, or corporate body associated with an item, e.g., Owners Custodians Curators 17

  18. Entities associated with items • Give as authorized access point in MARC 7XX fields in bibliographic record • Relationship designators from RDA appendix I.5 in subfield $e of 7XX field -- not required • Not a closed list • Do not include $e in name authority record

  19. Example: item 500 $a University Library's copy has ms. notes by author on endpapers. $5 IaH 700 $a Smiley, Jane, $e annotator. 541 $c Gift; $a John Jefferson; $d 2011. $5 DLC 700 $a Jefferson, John, $e donor.

  20. Entities in relationships: Group 1 Relationships between works, expressions, manifestations, and items -- relationships in bibliographic and/or authority records: Related works (ch. 25) Related expressions (ch. 26) Related manifestations (ch. 27) Related items (ch. 28) 20

  21. Related work (RDA 25.1) • Common work relationships: • Whole-part, e.g., • Works in a compilation • Chapters in a book • Adaptations • Supplements • Sequential relationships (e.g., earlier and later serials) 21

  22. Relationship: related work • Three methods (RDA 24.4) • Identifier (not used alone for now) • Authorized access point • Description (structured or unstructured) • Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.2 in subfield $i if MARC content designation doesn’t indicate relationship 22

  23. Structured/unstructured description • Structured description = note or linking field: indicate elements by ISBD punctuation or MARC tagging • Unstructured description = note using narrative rather a formal tagged structure to indicate the relationship

  24. Whole-part relationships • No limit on number of works, unless burdensome, in MARC 505 contents note • Cataloger’s judgment for number of MARC 7XX analytical authorized access points if that is the method used to give the relationship • Don’t need to justify the 7XX analytical access points by a 505 field 24

  25. Whole-part work example Authorized access points for the works: 100 1# $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616. 245 10 $a Hamlet ; $b King Lear / $c William Shakespeare. *700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616. $t Hamlet. *700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616. $t King Lear. * 2nd indicator in 700 indicates the relationship “Contains” 25

  26. Example: serial related works Structured descriptions and three identifiers each: 245 00 $a TCA journal. 785 00 $t Journal of professional counseling, practice, theory, & research $x 1556- 6382 $w (DLC) 2005205756 $w (OCoLC) 55891574 245 00 $a Journal of professional counseling, practice, theory, & research. 780 00 $t TCA journal $x 1556-4223 $w (DLC) 93645762 $w (OCoLC) 26906768 785 indicators 00 = relationship “Continued by” 780 indicators 00 = relationship “Continues” 26

  27. Related expression (RDA 26.1) • Common expression relationships: • Whole-part (e.g., translations in a compilation) • Revisions • Editions • Translations • Language editions • Abridgements 27

  28. Relationship: related expression • Three methods (RDA 24.4) • Identifier (not used alone in US RDA Test) • Authorized access point • Description (structured or unstructured) • Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.3 in subfield $i if MARC content designation does not give relationship 28

  29. Whole-part expression example Authorized access points for the expressions: 100 1# $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- 245 10 $a Two Norwegian novels / $c Per Petterson. 700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Ut og stjæle hester. $l English. 700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Til Sibir. $l English. Could also include a contents note but not required to justify the access points; or, a contents note without the 700 fields would be possible: 505 0# $a Out stealing horses -- To Siberia. 29

  30. Example: serial related expression Unstructured description for other language edition: 130 0# $a Revista de política y derecho ambientales en América Latina y el Caribe. $l English. 245 10 $a Journal of environmental policy and law in Latin America and the Caribbean. 580 ## $a Issued also in Spanish under title: Revista de política y derecho ambientales en América Latina y el Caribe. 30

  31. Related expression - translation (example 1) Authorized access point: 100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964- 240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French 245 10 $a Forteresse digitale. 700 1# $i Translation of: $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964- $t Digital fortress. 31

  32. Related expression - translation (example 2) Structured description in 500 field: 100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964- 240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French 245 10 $a Forteresse digitale. 500 ## $a Translation of: Digital fortress / Dan Brown. -- 1st ed. -- New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1998. -- 371 pages ; 22 cm. 32

  33. Related expression - translation (example 3) Structured description in 765 field: 100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964- 240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French 245 10 $a Forteresse digitale. *765 0#$a Brown, Dan, 1964- $t Digital fortress $b 1st ed. $d New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1998. $h 371 pages ; 22 cm $w (DLC) 9703318 * 2nd indicator “blank” = “Translation of” 33

  34. Related expression - translation (example 4) Unstructured description in 500 field: 100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964- 240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French 245 10 $a Forteresse digitale. 500 ## $a Translation of the author’s novel Digital fortress. 34

  35. Related manifestation (RDA 27.1) • Common manifestation relationships: • Reproductions • Different formats for same expression (e.g., book vs. CD; book vs. PDF) • Special issues 35

  36. Related manifestation (RDA 27.1) Two methods (RDA 24.4) Identifier (not used alone in RDA Test) Description (structured or unstructured) Not by an authorized access point Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.4 in subfield $i if MARC content designation does not give relationship 36

  37. Related manifestation example 245 00 $a Health statistics for elementary -school children. 260 ## $a Baltimore : $b Johns Hopkins University, $c 2009- 300 ## $a volumes ; $c 27 cm 776 08 $i Also issued as: $t Health statistics for elementary-school children $d Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University, $c 2009- $h CD-ROMs : 4 3/4 in.

  38. Related item (RDA 28.1) • Common item relationships • Reproduction of a specific copy • “Bound with” • Item added to copy of manifestation in a special collection • Relationships that apply only to a single copy of the manifestation -- so, usually local information 38

  39. Related item (RDA 28.1) Two methods (RDA 24.4) Identifier (not used alone in RDA Test) Description (structured or unstructured) Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.5 in subfield $i if MARC content designation does not give relationship 39

  40. Related item examples 500 $i Bound with: $a ___________. $5 DLC 775 $i Reprint of (item): $t Hiking in Unicoi State Park $d Helen, GA : RST Publishers, 1955. $h 22 p. : ill. ; 19 cm.

  41. Entities in relationships: Group 2 Relationships between persons, families, and corporate bodies -- relationships in authority records: Related persons (ch. 30) Related families (ch. 31) Related corporate bodies (ch. 32)

  42. Related persons, families, and/or corporate bodies • Relationship recorded in authority record in 5XX field • Can also give relationship designator from RDA appendix K in subfield$i to identify specific relationship • Some relationships in MARC indicated by values in subfield $w (e.g., “a” and “b” for earlier and later corporate bodies) -- cataloger judgment or library policy to use in lieu of subfield $i 42

  43. Examples: person related to corporate body or family 100 1# $a Garr, Arnold K. 510 2# $w r $i Employer: $a Brigham Young University 100 1# $a Carroll, Charles N. $q (Charles Nagus), $d 1817-1902 500 3# $w r $i Descendants: $a Carroll (Family : $g Carroll, Charles N. (Charles Negus), 1817-1902)

  44. Examples: related corporate bodies 110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division 510 2# $w r $i Predecessor: $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office 110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office 510 2# $w r $i Successor: $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division

  45. Examples: related corporate bodies Giving specific relationship in $w: 110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division 510 2# $w a $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office 110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office 510 2# $w b $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division

  46. Review • “Relate”: 2nd main goal of RDA (1st = identify) • Relationships within and between FRBR Group 1 (work, expression, manifestation, item) and Group 2 (person, family, corporate body) entities • Relationship designators in appendices I, J, and K • Questions? Then: Exercises #7 and #8

More Related