1 / 20

UTILITARIANISM

UTILITARIANISM. MILL. Ansay | Baniaga | CHUA | Harder | RAMA. John Stuart Mill. - English Philosopher - Born 20 May 1806 in London - Educated by his father, James Mill - Began a career at India house under his father in 1823 - Became a member of a small utilitarian society

noam
Télécharger la présentation

UTILITARIANISM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UTILITARIANISM MILL Ansay | Baniaga | CHUA | Harder | RAMA

  2. John Stuart Mill - English Philosopher - Born 20 May 1806 in London - Educated by his father, James Mill - Began a career at India house under his father in 1823 - Became a member of a small utilitarian society - Took part in various discussions - Became a frequent orator in London Debating Society - Best known for his essay On Liberty - Published Utilitarianism in 1863 - Died in 8 May 1873

  3. Ideas

  4. Utilitarianism Greatest Happiness Principle Holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness

  5. Pleasure and theAbsence of Pain are the only things inherently good. Any experience is desirable only because it is a source for such pleasure. Actions are good when they lead to a higher level of general happiness Utilitarianism takes into account not just the quantity but also the quality of pleasures resulting from it.

  6. Difference of Quality in Pleasure • There is a higher and lower quality pleasures • It of higher quality if people would choose it over a different pleasure even if accompanied by discomfort. • Given equal access to all kinds of pleasures, people will prefer those that appeal to their higher faculties. • Once people are made aware of their higher pleasures, they will never be happy to leave them uncultivated. • Even though a person who uses higher pleasures often suffers more in life, he would never choose a lower existence, preferring instead to maintain his dignity.

  7. Objections-Mill’s Answers “Happiness couldn’t be the rational aim of human life because it is unattainable.” “Happiness is not a life of rapture, but moments of such, in an existence made up of few transitory pains, many and various pleasures [sic]”

  8. Objections-Mill’s Answers “Utilitarianism is a godless doctrine.” “... the question depends upon what idea we have formed of the character of the Deity.”

  9. Objections-Mill’s Answers “Utilitarianism is immoral because of Expediency.” “But the Expedient, in the sense in which it is opposed to the Right, generally means that which is expedient for the particular interest of the agent himself... is expedient for some immediate object, some temporary purpose, but which violates a rule whose observance expedient in a much higher degree.” ”

  10. Sanctions Principle of utility has all the sanctions of any other moral system

  11. Ultimate Sanction of Utility “Conscientious feelings of mankind” • Transcendental fact VS Pure subjectivity • “Do I need to obey my conscience?” • Moral feelings are not innate but acquired, but no less natural and can be cultivated in almost any direction

  12. Social Aspect Basis of powerful natural sentiment: social feeling of mankind “desire to be in unity with our fellow creatures”

  13. “It does not present itself to their minds as a superstition of education, or a law despotically imposed by the power of society, but as an attribute which would not be well for them to be without.” - Mill

  14. Significance

  15. Significant because happiness deals with everyone Utilitarianism is social in nature -It puts happiness at the forefront directing people -assume people want happiness as the ends

  16. Case 1: Organ donor baby moral dilemma Twist: Other family members were involved > Utilitarianism would either have: a. called for a family vote b. determined organs were for the greater good

  17. Case 2: The Dark Knight (2008 film) Recall last scene: “Because he’s the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now…” - A Utilitarian would agree - But... was it “just”?

  18. Case 3: Parent-chosen life path Family’s happiness vs. personal happiness (context: well-off family) - A Utilitarian would probably say follow your parents * Happiness of one vs. many * Parents (supposedly) know best

  19. Reflections

  20. Could one’s happiness be a negative end for others? If everyone seeked their own happiness, there would be consequences. “Utilitarianism seems to be selfish. At some point in your life, you also have to prioritize and think about yourself.” -Maymay It seems to be too flexible. Agent-neutrality is bothering. It’s very economical.

More Related