1 / 45

TAIEX Seminar 23/03/2004, Sofia

Wildlife management & Hunting in an enlarged Europe Challenges & Opportunities. Tallinn, Estonia - 11.02.2011. Dr. Yves Lecocq FACE Secretary-General. Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the E.U.

Télécharger la présentation

TAIEX Seminar 23/03/2004, Sofia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wildlife management & Hunting in an enlarged EuropeChallenges & Opportunities Tallinn, Estonia - 11.02.2011 Dr. Yves Lecocq FACE Secretary-General Federationof Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the E.U. Nature conservation & awareness raising among the European hunters’ community Fédération des Associations de Chasse et Conservation de la Faune Sauvage de l’U.E. TAIEX Seminar 23/03/2004, Sofia

  2. FACE - Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the E.U. => Defends and represents the collective interests of its Members at European and international level=> Promotes hunting in accordance with the principle of wise and sustainable use=> Members in 36 European countries (representing 7 million hunters), including Estonia

  3. FACE - Principle of wise and sustainable use of natural resources Sustainable use of natural resources = conservation tool IUCN Policy Statement, Amman 2000 Use of wild living resources, if sustainable, is an important conservation tool because the social and economic benefits derived from such use provide incentives for people to conserve them

  4. The impact of “Europe” on Hunting? Federationof Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the E.U. Fédération des Associations de Chasse et Conservation de la Faune Sauvage de l’U.E.

  5. There is no European or EU hunting policy but There are a number of Regulations, Directives, Conventions or policies likely to directly or indirectly affect hunting in practice

  6. Europe = wide diversity of landscapes, flora and fauna But this diversity also applies to human cultures and traditions This socio-cultural diversity constitutes a great asset and value. DIVERSITY !

  7. 4 Models for "Europe of Hunting"

  8. Northern Europe • Natural “harvest” (intended to generate food) • Hunting is popular and democratic • Highest proportion of hunters in Europe (1/20) • Free access to private land • Sometimes free hunting on public land

  9. Southern Europe • Social event • Management focused on habitats rather than on species • Hunting is popular (1/40) • Hunting rights not always linked to property rights

  10. Anglo-Saxon Countries • Considered a “sport” • “Sportive” or gentleman behaviour • Professional habitat and game management • 1 of 60 citizens is a hunter • Priority for property rights

  11. Central Europe • Long tradition and strict rules, well regulated hunting • Above all management of larger game species • Low proportion of hunters (1/300) • Hunting right (partly) dissociated from property right

  12. Common Features • Love for Nature • Active interest in wildlife management • Strong social dimension • Close link between hunters and their dogs

  13. Benefits from hunting • Game management • Wildlife conservation • Habitat restoration & management • Contribute to rural development • 3 billion € spent on Biodiversity • 120.000 full-time jobs

  14. 7 Million European Hunters 75% hunt in local area • on own land • on rented land • on public land • as member of a local association, club, syndicate… • as (paying) guest

  15. Judgment of 20.01.2011 in the Case Herrmann v. Germany (application no. 9300/07)

  16. …the Court agreed that the obligation to allow the practice of the hunt on Mr X’s premises interfered with his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his property…accepted, however, that the aim of the provisions in question, namely the fact that the management of the game stock was aimed at maintaining varied and healthy game populations and at avoiding game damage, was in the general interest

  17. …the situation in Germany…made it necessary to allow area-wide hunting on all suitable premises…The German legal regime did…not exempt any public or private owners of property which was suitable for hunting from the obligation to tolerate hunting on their premises

  18. …justified in particular by the necessity to pool smaller plots in order to allow for area-wide hunting and thus to assure an effective management of the game stock

  19. The Court noted that the hunting associations…were established in the form of public-law associations, being subject to the control of the hunting authority…were thus subject to State supervision…beyond the supervision normally exercised over private associations…sufficiently integrated into State structures in order to qualify them as public law institutions

  20. Hunting "Game" Species = wild living resource Sustainable use = important conservation tool “because the social and economic benefits derived from such use provide incentives for people to conserve them” (IUCN; World Conservation Congress, Amman, October 2000)

  21. FACE = Lobbying to promote hunting at the level of European institutions Principle of Subsidiarity • No uniform “European hunting Law” • No unnecessary “harmonisation” (e.g. of hunting systems) • Framework of legal instruments and policies

  22. E.U. Legislation from a hunting point of view

  23. EU hygiene and public health rules Contribute to a better perception by the public of game meat as a quality product

  24. "Firearms" Directive European Firearms Pass -> facilitates travelling for hunters

  25. "Birds" Directive (79/409/EEC) “on the conservation of wild birds”

  26. "Birds" Directive Preamble : whereas, because of their high population level, geographical distribution and reproductive rate, certain species may be hunted, which constitutes acceptable exploitation;

  27. "Birds" Directive Article 1 : This Directive relates to the conservation of all species of naturally occurring birds in the wild states … and … covers the protection, management and control of these species and lays down rules for their exploitation

  28. "Birds" Directive Article 2 :Member States shall… maintain the population of the species… at a level which corresponds in particular toecological, scientific and cultural requirements& taking account of economic and recreational requirements

  29. "Birds" Directive Article 4The species mentioned in Annex I shall be the subject of conservation measures concerning their habitat…Member States shall classify the most suitable territories as special protection areas

  30. "Birds" Directive • Article5:Member States shall… establish a general system of protection for all species of birds… prohibiting in particular: • deliberate killing or capture…- deliberate destruction of, or damage to, their nests and eggs…- deliberate disturbance of these birds particularly during the period of breeding and rearing grounds…

  31. "Birds" Directive Article7:Owing to their population level, geographical distribution and reproductive rate… the species listed in Annex II (II/1 & II/2) may be hunted under national legislation

  32. "Birds" Directive Article7§4:Member States shall… see… that the species to which hunting regulation apply are not hunted during their period of reproduction or during their return to their rearing grounds

  33. "Birds" Directive Article8Member States shall prohibit the use of all means, arrangements or methods used for the large-scale or non-selective capture or killing of birds… in particular… those listed in Annex IV

  34. "Birds" Directive Article9§1:Member States may derogate… where there is no other satisfactory solution… (a)… - to prevent serious damage to crops, livestock,… - for the protection of flora and fauna…(c) to permit, under strictly supervised conditions and on a selective basis the… judicious use of certain birds in small numbers.

  35. "Guidance document on hunting under Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation ofwild birds"

  36. "Habitats" or “F.F.H.” Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wildfauna and flora

  37. Article 3:A coherent European ecological network of special areas of conservation shall be set up under the title NATURA 2000… composed of sites hosting the natural habitat types listed in Annex I and habitats of the species listed in Annex II

  38. Article 6:Member States shall take appropriate steps to avoid, in the special areas of conservation (+ special protection areas), the deterioration of habitats… as well as disturbance of the species for which the areas have been designated, in so far as such disturbance could be significant…

  39. Article 12:Member States shall take the requisite measures to establish a system of strict protection for the species listed in Annex IV- all bat species - Castor fiber- Canis lupus (except certain regions)- Ursus arctos- Lutra lutra- Lynx lynx (except Estonia)- …

  40. Article 14:If… Member States deem it necessary, they shall take measures to ensure that the taking in the wild of specimens of species listed in Annex V… is compatible with their being maintained at a favourable conservation status.- Martes martes- Mustela putorius- Lepus timidus- Rupicapra rupicapra+ Lynx (Estonia), Wolf (certain regions)- …

  41. Article 16:Provided that there is no satisfactory alternative… Member States may derogate… (a) in the interest of protecting wild fauna and flora…(b) to prevent serious damage…(c) in the interest of public health and public safety, of for other imperative reasons of overriding public interest, including those of a social or economic nature…(e) to allow, under strictly supervised conditions, on a selective basis… the taking or keeping of certain Annex IV specimens in limited numbers

  42. Brown bear - Wolf - Lynx "Conservation through sustainable use"

  43. Sustainable Hunting Initiative Partners: FACE, BirdLife International, European Commission D.G. ENV 10 points, including: - accepting the “Birds” Directive- programme for scientific (data collecting), conservation (management plans, hunting inside protected areas) & awareness raising measures =>Charter on sustainable hunting?

  44. Agreement FACE/BirdLife International (10/2004) Both organisations: - recognise the “Birds” Directive as an appropriate legal instrument - support the NATURA 2000 Network, which is not incompatible with hunting- promote the collecting of data, including of hunting bag statistics- call for enforcement, education and awareness raising- ask that lead shot for hunting in wetlands is phased out by 2009

  45. Thank you for your attention

More Related