380 likes | 507 Vues
Join us for Day 2 of our Crutch Systems Design Review led by Ana Allen, Joanna Dzionara-Norsen, Beverly Liriano, and Dan Sawicki. This session will cover key topics including initial and revised concepts using Pugh Charts, comparative analysis of innovative crutch designs, and engineering assessments for stability and load analysis. We will explore pros and cons of various concepts including aspects of aesthetics, functionality, and user experience. Engage with us as we present our findings and open the floor for questions on our novel crutch designs!
E N D
P14042: Una-Crutch Right Move, Right Place, Right Time Systems Design Review Day 2 Ana Allen Joanna Dzionara-Norsen Beverly Liriano Dan Sawicki
Concept NA • Pros: • Springs relax user tension • Large surface area on single crutch • Hinge is simple to use • Cons: • Expensive • Many components • Too many steps to assemble Pin Hinge
Concept NB • Pros: • Easy connection • Aesthetically pleasing • Innovative design • Minimal components • Spring base • Cons: • Bulky • Potentially expensive • Magnetic Connection Male/female mold Male/female mold and/or pin Magnetic
Concept NC Male/female mold • Pros: • Adjustable handle • Spring base • Male/female mold is an easy connection • Innovative design • Cons: • Stability • Thickness Male/female mold Clamp
Concept ND • Pros: • Lightweight • Revolutionary handle design • Cons: • Base connection is inconvenient if user is on one leg • Similar to axilla crutch Guide track Male/female mold Snap
Concept NE Male/female mold • Pros: • Foldable into a cane • Lightweight • Stable • Cons: • Two separate bases • Not aesthetically pleasing • Pad is in contact with the ground Pin
Concept NF • Pros: • Largest surface area for connection • No axillary component • Spring base • Minimal components • Cons: • Not aesthetically pleasing • Stability compromised Male/female mold for elbows
High μs value to low μs value Ice will result in slip the quickest! Concrete is least likely to slip!
Cantilevered Beam Analysis • Crutch handle modeled as a cantilevered beam with a distributed load and external moment: • Cross-sections considered: circular, square, hollow circular, I-beam, T-beam • Maximum stress from bending: = 25 MPa = 27.6 MPa L = 0.39in OD = 0.47 in = 12 mm Smallest dimensions at which the maximum stress from bending does not exceed the yield strength of aluminum L = 0.39in = 10 mm
Static Analysis ASSUMPTIONS: P ΣFy=ma=0 Σfy=-P+Nf=0 P=Nf Nf
Static Analysis ASSUMPTIONS: ΣFy=ma=0 ΣFy=Nf-Cy=0 Nf=Cy=P Dx Cx Cy Dy Nf
Static Analysis P BX BX By By ΣFy=ma=0 ΣFy=2By-P=0 By=P/2
Statics Analysis Ax Ax
Static Analysis ASSUMPTIONS: Ax Bx By unknown: 3 unknowns Ax,BX,Cx Equations: 3 equations ΣFy=ma=0 ΣFx=ma=0 ΣM=0 Dy Cx Cy Dx