1 / 26

T he A coustic S un S imulator Computing medium- l data

T he A coustic S un S imulator Computing medium- l data. Shravan Hanasoge Thomas Duvall, Jr. HEPL, Stanford University. Why artificial data?. Validation of helioseismic techniques

nubia
Télécharger la présentation

T he A coustic S un S imulator Computing medium- l data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Acoustic Sun Simulator Computing medium-l data Shravan Hanasoge Thomas Duvall, Jr. HEPL, Stanford University

  2. Why artificial data? • Validation of helioseismic techniques • Improve understanding of wave interaction with flow structures, sunspot-like regions etc. – the need for controlled experiments • Improving existing techniques based on this understanding

  3. generating the data… • Acoustic waves are excited by radially directed stochastic dipoles • Waves propagate through a frozen background state that can include flows, temperature perturbations etc. • The acoustic signal is extracted at the photospheric level of the simulation

  4. Computation of Sources • Granulation acts like a spatial delta function, exciting all medium-l the same way. • Use a Gaussian random variable to generate a uniform spherical harmonic-spectrum and frequency limited series in the spherical harmonic – frequency space • Transform to real space to produce uncorrelated sources

  5. Theoretical model • The linearized Euler equations with a Newton cooling type damping are solved • Viscous and conductive process are considered negligible (time scale differences)

  6. Computational model • Horizontal derivatives computed spectrally • Radial derivatives with compact finite differecnces • Time stepping by optimized 5 stage LDDRK (Hu et al. 1996) • Parallelism in OpenMP and MPI • Model S of the sun as the al.) background state (Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et

  7. Horizontal variations • Spherical Harmonic decomposition of variables in the horizontal direction • Horizontal derivatives are calculated in Spherical Harmonic space (expensive) • Gaussian collocated grid points in latitude and equally spaced in longitude

  8. Crazy density changes… • 11 scale heights between r = 0.26 and r = 0.986 • 13 scale heights between r = 0.9915 and r =1.0005 • Grid allocation method is a combination of log-density and sound-speed

  9. Radial variations • Interior radial collocation: constant acoustic travel-time between adjacent grid point • Near surface collocation: constant in log density • Sixth order compact finite differences in the radial direction

  10. Radial grid spacing

  11. Boundary conditions • Absorbing boundary conditions on the top and bottom • Implemented using a ‘sponge’

  12. Convective instabilities • The outer 30% of the sun is convectively unstable • The near-surface (0.1% of the radius) is highly unstable – start of the Hydrogen ionization zone • Modeling convection is infeasible • Instability growth rates around 5 minutes; corrupt the acoustic signal • Solution: altered the solar model to render the model stable

  13. Artificially stabilized model • Convectively stable • Maintain cutoff frequencies • Smooth extension of the interior model S • Hydrostatic equilibrium

  14. Log power spectrum – 24 hour data cube. Simulation domain extends from the outer core to the evanescent region. Banded structure due to limited excitation spectrum.

  15. Validation I – eigen-modes

  16. Validation II – frequency shifts by constant rotation

  17. Traveltimes

  18. Acoustic Wave Correlations Medium l data correlations Correlation from simulations Note that signal-noise levels compare very well!

  19. Linewidths and asymmetries • Solar-like velocity asymmetry • Asymmetry reduces at higher frequencies due to damping

  20. Computational efficiency • The usefulness of this method limited by the rapidity of the computation • Currently, 2 seconds of computational time to advance solar time by 1 second (at high l ) • The hope is to push this ratio to 1:1 or perhaps even better

  21. Interpreting the data… • Motivation guiding the effort: differential studies of helioseismic effects • Datum: a simulation with no perturbations • Differences in helioseismic signatures of effects are expected to be mostly insensitive to the neglected physics

  22. Capabilities at present • L < 200 (spherical harmonic degree) –OpenMP • Tested for L ~ 341 (works efficiently) with the MPI version • Can simulate acoustic interaction with: • Arbitrary flows • Sunspot type perturbations (no magnetic fields) • Essentially, perturbations in density, temperature, pressure and velocities

  23. Current applications • Can we detect convection? • Far-side imaging: validation • Solar rotation: how good are our estimates? • Tachocline studies • Meridional flow models: validation • Line of Sight projection effects

  24. References for this work • Computational Acoustics in spherical geometry: Steps towards validating helioseismology, Hanasoge et al. ApJ 2006 (to appear in September) • Computational Acoustics, Hanasoge, S. M. 2006, ILWS proceedings

  25. Want artificial data? Email: shravan@stanford.edu

More Related