120 likes | 247 Vues
This paper presents the EU's perspective on poverty maps and their strategic importance in addressing the needs of marginalized communities, particularly the Roma. It discusses the challenges faced by small deprived areas in accessing funds and the need for better-defined target locations. The study highlights the impact of poverty on individuals, neighborhoods, and regions, advocating for policy approaches that empower local communities through skill training, improved public services, and integrated funding strategies. National strategies to include geographical scopes and foster dialogue with excluded communities are essential for effective poverty alleviation.
E N D
The EU perspective on poverty maps and their use
A case for poverty maps • Small deprived areas have difficulty receiving funds • Better defining the target areas • Indirectly approaching the most vulnerable, e.g. Roma without the ethnic criteria • Example: Hungary, 33 poorest micro-regions host 1/3 of the Roma but only 10% of the national population
Commission's contribution • 1.2 m EUR for this cooperation with the World Bank • Pilot study in Bulgaria and Denmark • National Statistical Offices's involvement in further development of the maps and their use after are crucial
Poverty maps in service of the national Roma integration strategies National strategies: • set goals for education, employment, healthcare and housing of the Roma • define the geographical scope of the excluded communities • foster a dialogue with Roma communities and leaders
The spread of poverty • Poverty – a characteristic of • persons • households • neighbourhoods • areas • regions
From the policy perspective... • If poverty characterises an area, individuals are trapped in a system of problems. • Policy attempts to empower the local community by...
... training people and giving them new skills • providing public transport, make commuting easier • better business environment (IT, transport) • services of general interest: schools, hospitals • reducing environmental pollution
Cohesion Policy 2014-20 Member States are invited to • develop strategies to address the needs of the poorest and the excluded groups of society • Choice between: • geographical approach: areas affected (poverty mapping is necessary) • target group approach: low income, migrants, Roma, disabled etc. (poverty maps are not necessary).
Reinforced social dimension of new European Social Fund • 25% of the Cohesion envelope for the ESF (84bn) • 20% of the ESF for promoting social inclusion and fighting poverty • ESF investment priority on the integration of marginalized communities, such as Roma • simplified financial management procedures and focus on results • earmarking for capacity building of NGOs • better coordination of various fund to allow for integrated approaches strands of funding
Sustainable urban development • 5 % of the Regional Development Fund will support sustainable urban development • and this may be combined with the European Social Fund • Poverty maps to help define deprived urban areas
Poverty maps to help improve the targeting Structural Funds • More effective targeting of Structural Funds to promote economic, social and territorial cohesion • The territorial approaches are not visible enough in the current European Social Fund, the poverty maps could help correct this
Thank you for your attention Szilvia.Kalman@ec.europa.eu Bartek.Lessaer@ec.europa.eu DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion