1 / 10

Why reform is needed

CSHB 3759 Testimony House Human Services Committee April 19, 2007 Celia Hagert, Senior Policy Analyst 512-320-0222 x110 hagert@cppp.org. Why reform is needed. Recent changes in federal TANF rules have put states in a tight spot

nuru
Télécharger la présentation

Why reform is needed

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CSHB 3759TestimonyHouse Human Services CommitteeApril 19, 2007Celia Hagert, Senior Policy Analyst 512-320-0222 x110 hagert@cppp.org

  2. Why reform is needed • Recent changes in federal TANF rules have put states in a tight spot • Texas TANF work program (“Choices”) is designed to help able-bodied parents with relatively low barriers to employment • Choices is NOT designed to help parents with greater barriers to employment become employable

  3. Why reform is needed 4) Texas has done a good job getting able-bodied parents into low-wage jobs; BUT we need to do more to support the transition from low-wage jobs to true self-sufficiency 5) Texas needs a compliance-oriented approach to improve the effectiveness of full-family sanctions. The full-family sanction policy was adopted to increase compliance with program rules and get more recipients working; INSTEAD it has pushed tens of thousand of families off of welfare, leaving them jobless and in poverty.

  4. TANF at a Glance • Limited eligibility: • Income cannot be higher than $188/month (family of 3) to qualify • Small benefit: • Average benefit is $200/month; maximum is $220 • By definition, our TANF population is hard-to-serve

  5. The Work Participation Rate • Federal law requires states to engage 50% of adults in federally approved work activities for a minimum number of hours per week (30 for single parents, 35 or more for two-parent families). • Feds include most adults in the calculation, with limited exceptions • *States can exempt adults even if they are included in the WPR Numerator Denominator Adults meeting the work requirement Adults subject to work participation*

  6. Primary challenges • Over the last decade, the TANF population has become harder-to-serve due to time limits, work rules, and strict sanctions • Persons with serious barriers to employment now make up a greater share of our caseload, which makes it harder for Texas to meet federal work participation requirements. • We have more hard-to-serve people in the “denominator” and fewer able-bodied adults

  7. Feds have made things worse • Recent changes in federal rules restrict what work activities “count” and limit states’ flexibility to reduce work hours • Rules also subjected more people to federal work participation, i.e., increased “denominator” • This makes it harder for Texas to design effective work program for persons with barriers to employment

  8. CSHB 3759 provides solutions • Increases the number of families meeting the work requirement (“the numerator”) • Work support program • Post-sanction review increases compliance • Decreases the number of families subject to federal work participation (“the denominator”) • Solely state-funded program (also caseload reduction credit)

  9. CSHB 3759 helps low-income parents • Gets more families to work by increasing compliance • Helps recent welfare leavers make the transition from low-wage work to self-sufficiency • Ensures that parents who can’t work, or who need specialized services or more time to overcome barriers to get this assistance

  10. CSHB 3759 increases program integrity and effectiveness • Establishes a standardized good cause process to ensure caseworkers are following policy and imposing sanctions fairly • Gives the Legislature the tools to judge the effectiveness of full family sanctions

More Related