1 / 12

How we like to be taught

How we like to be taught. Ann Rumpus University of Westminster. Getting feedback on:. Course delivery Teaching and learning Assessment. Two approaches:. DVD of general student opinion Focus groups for specific course, with independent facilitators. Wider issues:. The voice The impact

nysa
Télécharger la présentation

How we like to be taught

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How we like to be taught

  2. Ann Rumpus University of Westminster

  3. Getting feedback on: • Course delivery • Teaching and learning • Assessment

  4. Two approaches: • DVD of general student opinion • Focus groups for specific course, with independent facilitators

  5. Wider issues: • The voice • The impact • The cost • How representative? • The shelf life

  6. The voice • DVD - very authentic, but are students willing to speak out? Are there ethical issues? Proactive? • Focus group – felt very free to speak through an intermediary, important to capture actual phrases Reactive?

  7. The impact • DVD – High impact, but staff can say “not in my course”; good as generic prompt to thinking • Focus group – Surprisingly high impact, directly related to detail delivery of course; good to engender real change • Could we encourage face to face dialogue?

  8. The cost • DVD – High, even using students to produce it, plus the staff time to guide the process • Focus group – Much cheaper, but still takes considerable time to prepare, undertake and write up

  9. How representative? A fair question for both • DVD - students willing to engage • Focus groups – hard to recruit students, even at course level Students were pleased to contribute once they had engaged

  10. The shelf life • DVD – fairly long term? But will it lose impact if it’s seen too often? For staff induction? Pg Cert? • Focus groups – short term immediate change, but can be repeated

  11. Overall • A very valuable approach • Need to engender an appropriate climate of staff engagement, at a local level • Need to engender a climate of consultation with students • Need to make student contribution worthwhile to the students

  12. Precise approach chosen is about fitness for purpose • Is it shaping the curriculum or asking for reactions? • Participating in the project has been a hugely valuable learning experience.

More Related