90 likes | 192 Vues
Explore the latest developments and future plans of the U.S. CCEVS program, including lab accreditations, product evaluations, and the fee-for-service model implementation.
E N D
U.S. Common CriteriaEvaluation & Validation Scheme (CCEVS)Update25 September 2007 Audrey M. Dale Director, NIAP CCEVS
Agenda • The U.S. Scheme this past year • Current status of the U.S. Scheme • The U.S. Scheme in the upcoming year
The U.S. Scheme This Past Year • Program resources severely constrained - Validation process revised – Validation Oversight Reviews (VORs) instead of continuous oversight - Only accepted Medium or High Robustness PP compliant products - Validator resources reduced by 50% • Initiated work on fee-for-service model for validation oversight - Government legislation changed to allow fee collection - Proposed fee schedule posted for comment
Current Status of the U.S. Scheme • Common Criteria Testing Labs (CCTLs) • 8 accredited labs • 3 candidate labs • Products (Aug 07) • 149 products “in evaluation” • 210 product certificates issued to date • Protection Profiles (PPs) • 42 Validated PPs -- 24 U.S. Government PPs being converted to CC V3.1 -- 8 of the U.S. Government PPs are being sun-setted
Current Status of the U.S. Scheme Common Criteria Testing Labs • Booz Allen Hamilton Linthicum, Maryland • Arca Sterling, Virginia • atsec Austin, Texas • COACT, Inc. Columbia, Maryland • Computer Sciences Corp. Annapolis Junction, MD • CygnaCom Solutions, Inc. McLean, Virginia • InfoGard Laboratories, Inc. San Luis Obispo, CA • Science Applications Int’l Corp. Columbia, MD Plus 3 Candidate Labs (BKP, BT, DIAL) Sep 07
Current Status of U.S. Scheme Products 210 Completed Evaluations 149 Evaluations in Progress
The U.S. Scheme in the Upcoming Year • Implement fee-for-service model for validation oversight • Continue to maintain program with constrained resources • Focus on PP compliant and EAL4 evaluations • Research and implement additional methods for increasing the efficiency, consistency and customer value of evaluations • Continue reductions in validation oversight while maintaining quality of evaluations and meeting the requirements for Mutual Recognition • Increase validator training & interaction to help maintain consistency of evaluations • Continue investigating the use of tools
Questions ? NIAP CCEVS Website containing U.S. CC program information to include all U.S. CC evaluated products, products currently “in-evaluation,” Protection Profiles, and accredited U.S. CC testing labs www.niap-ccevs.org The National Information Assurance Partnership / Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme ®
Contact Information Audrey M. Dale Director, NIAP CCEVS National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 U.S.A Telephone: +1 410-854-4458 amdale@missi.ncsc.mil